similar to: Network Stops when network-bridge starts

Hi. I have some new 64bit Windows 2008 R2 domU''s running on SLES11/xen_3.4.2. What is everyone using to get 1gb network performance on win2k8? I''ve used GPLPV on win2k3, but I see you have to sign the drivers yourself for 64bit. Maybe that process isn''t difficult, I only glance at the link from gplpv''s page. What is everyone using? GPLPV is about the only

Hi Everyone, I am trying my hands on xen under Solaris SXCE build 113. The machine has the following configuration: 2 Quad Core Xeon CPUs 16 GB RAM Solaris SXCE b113 4 disks - 2 mirrors x 2 stripes under ZFS The problem is that xen HVM is very slow. I am using the following command to create an Ubuntu 9.0.4 test vm. virt-install -n test1 -r 2048 --vcpus=2 -f /vdatapool/data/test1.img -s 50

I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on Centos. I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this some of which are packages that seem quite dated from an update perspective (Ultra Monkey links I've seen haven't been updated in a while). What is the current best practice on this for this platform? My first foray into any of the

All, I would like to run the following issue past the list to confirm that my problem analysis makes sense or whether I missed something: We have a HP ML370G6 server with VT-x and VT-d enabled in the BIOS. It is equipped with two Smart Array HBAs - one connected to the HDD array (SmartArray P800) and one connected to an LTO tape drive (SmartArray P212). Both controllers use the same driver

I added a virtual interface eth0:1 on one of my machines and suddenly networking breaks on startup of the system (eth0 is gone) when xend starts and runs the network-bridge script. This is supposed to be fixed according to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi I checked and the network-bridge script contains this fix. It works fine on one of my PCs when eth0:1 is added, but not on this

Hi, I've been using CentOS & Xen on a server that has 2 VM's configured. The default configuration includes one physical iface that is propagated (by a default bridge) to the VM's. Since I wanted to configure additional physical iface, define a new bridge and propagate it to the viface-s of the VM's, i configured the bridge/phys. iface and brought it up (here are

Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0

Hi, I have taken the long and winding road and indeed it lead me to your door. I need your help, please. My Xen includes 2 guests. Xen itself (10.2.0.52) gets free access to the outside world and to its guests. Both guests however (10.2.0.54/10.2.0.55) see each other but stay under house arrest! Not a single ping manages to go past the bridge (xenbr0) and get an answer from the default gateway

Hello! I''ve got CentOS 5.3 x64 as dom0 and the same OS for domU. I''ve installed it using the following manual: http://www.howtoforge.com/centos_5.0_xen Guest image was taken from stacklet.com Unfortunately, I can''t make domU working with public static IP. When I use bridged networking, the guest don''t have network connection at all. When I use routed

My very first xen DomU can not ping anything on my network. Well that is not entirely true, it can ping itself. I did not touch any of the scripts in /etc/xen so xen should be using bridging. My pc is running xen-unstable and uses a 3Com PCI 3c905B Just after the ''xen start'' on Dom0 brctl shows: bash-3.00# brctl show xenbr0 bridge name bridge id STP

Greetings, I have recently built two machines both with Intel VT technology CPU''s but when I try to create a hvm guest I get an error that the host doesn''t support it. Is there a compatibility guide I can consult on whether perhaps my motherboards are either not compliant or perhaps need a bios or jumper setting adjusted to enable hardware virtualization support?

Hi, I have only one ethernet port in a remote server. (eth0) I have a public address with x.x.x.164 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161 and want to use in my guest OS the next available ip address (x.x.x.165 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161) Is this posible with brctl to achieve this? I did a file called ifcfg-xenbr0 with: DEVICE=xenbr0 TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=yes then

Hi, I have only one ethernet port in a remote server. (eth0) I have a public address with x.x.x.164 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161 and want to use in my guest OS the next available ip address (x.x.x.165 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161) Is this posible with brctl to achieve this? I did a file called ifcfg-xenbr0 with: DEVICE=xenbr0 TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=yes then

I'm seeing an issue with xend not running a custom network script automatically, but works when I run it manually. In /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp I've changed: (network-script network-bridge) TO: (network-script network-custom) Here is /etc/xen/scripts/network-custom: # !/bin/bash # network-custom script=/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge case $1 in start) $script start vifnum=0

Hi, I''m trying to set up networking on a new machine. I''m not getting any networking from the domU''s I notice that I have two bridges being created: xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3024 errors:0 dropped:0

Hi *, having built Xen 4.1.0 and running my Dom0 on Slackware 13.1, I''m trying to assign different physical network interfaces to different DomU guests: vif = [ ''bridge=ethX'' ] in the DomU configuration files. My /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge script, however, doesn''t create more than one bridge: root@cen:~# /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start

I installed 64-bit xen 3.1.0 (from xensource.com tarballs) on three new machines today, using a configuration setup that I''ve used successfully many times before. However, I encountered a new problem. These are Dell Poweredge 1950 servers, by the way. >From lspci 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) 08:00.0 Ethernet

Hi I am trying to install xen (64bit) on a Dell PowerEdge 2900. The installation process was something like the following: ----- apt-get install iproute bridge-utils python-twisted binutils zlib1g-dev python-dev transfig bzip2 screen ssh debootstrap libcurl3-dev libncurses5-dev x-dev build-essential gettext python-pyopenssl python-pam python-xml latex tetex-extra tetex-base

Hello again, folks! I''m getting one strange problem with FC5 running on XEN 3.0.3 x64... The MRTG point to my machine with XEN running one absurd volume of output data sent (normal is around 6 MB/s) and when XEN is working we get 80 MB/s until my DRAC is alive... after this, the machine crash, DRAC stop do reply, swith stop do work together... Anyone knows whats happening now? ;)

Hello everybody, Here again with a Xenbr0 bridge problem I''m a Gentoo user, xen-sources-2.6.34 and I always used the bridge from eth0 to xenbr0. Here''s what I get at boot time: * Bringing up interface eth0 * null [...] * Starting Xen control daemon ... And the bridge doesn''t come up. The normal behaviour should be that the Xenbr0 bridge comes up automatically, but