similar to: Question about hiding pci devices.

Hi, Can someone interpret how HVM guest communicate with domain0, as i know, H VM can not use event channel directly, is the platform-pci offer a way to solve this? Please try to explain concretely, for example : 1.how does HVM send a event to domain0, how does domain0 catch this event, and assoicate it with a handler 2.the opposite direction, how does domain0 send event to HVM guest? Does it

I'm trying to hide my PRV-350 PCI card from Dom0 so that a DomU can see it. >From Dom0, the card reports as: [root at willamette ~]# lspci |grep 06:02 06:02.0 Multimedia video controller: Internext Compression Inc iTVC15 MPEG-2 Encoder (rev 01) The ivtv driver isn't installed on Dom0. I have added the following to /etc/modprobe.conf on Dom0: options pciback hide=(0000:06:02.0) but

I've been trying to open up multiple instances of WoW under Wine for a while now... I can get two copies open at once without a problem, but I run into issues when I try to open a third. Some background: I'm running each one from a separate install, not trying to open them all from the same folder. I'm using Wine 1.1.2, and the latest binary nVidia drivers (173.14.12). I've

Hi all, To boot a Xen from grub, we normally use a Xen kernel and a domain0 kernel & initrd.img as its modules. Now, I want to merge these three files into one single kernel file, then I can boot it without modules. I am doing this because a simulator environment only has one file entry for the kernel. Do you guys have some hints on how to do that? BTW, I can merge the domain0 kernel &

Hi, next step, # dmesg | grep pciback Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/sda2 ro console=tty0 pciback.hide=(0000:02:05.0)(0000:02:06.0)(0000:02:07.0)(0000:02:08.0)(0000:02:09.0) ) Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda2 ro console=tty0 pciback.hide=(0000:02:05.0)(0000:02:06.0)(0000:02:07.0)(0000:02:08.0)(0000:02:09.0) Unknown boot option

Hi, once again, Problems with pciback and pci passthrough the system -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOMAIN0:~# lspci -tv -[0000:00]-+-00.0 nVidia Corporation nForce3 250Gb Host Bridge +-01.0 nVidia Corporation nForce3 250Gb LPC Bridge +-01.1 nVidia Corporation nForce 250Gb PCI System Management +-02.0

Hello, I am looking into building a workstation using Xen to host several operating systems. Looking at the pci passthrough requirements of Xen4.1 on the VTdHowTo<http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/VTdHowTo>page, I am a little puzzled with the fact that only Intel Core2Duo (with VT-x), Core2Quad, i7 and Core i5 (vPro Brand) CPU''s are supported while motherboards with the i55x0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, I am currently considering to upgrade my Ubuntu Hardy Dom0 from Xen 3.2 to 3.3, but I am a bit concerned about some of my DomUs that rely on PCI Passthrough. Are there any restrictions or problems with PCI Passthrough in Xen 3.3, anything I have to look out for, especially with the Hardy Dom0 kernel in mind? Thanks, Paul. -

Hey folks! I want to add a CentOS 5.2 domU to an existing server (Fedora 8) which was setup by another company. The Dom0 does not provide any other services but a BIND-DHCP-server (they deleted dnsmasq and installed bind). Don''t ask my why they did that. My new DomU is connected to eth0, which is a bridge. BIND also listens on eth0 to serve other machines. I start the install of centos

> This subthread in the Xen patch thread has now digressed onto discussions > about entropy and security. Perhaps you guys could add some points. Well, I can try. I don't think this answers any questions, but perhaps it informs the discussion. Apologies if the Cc: list is getting a bit bloated. > On 11 May 2006, at 01:33, Herbert Xu wrote: >>> But if sampling virtual

> This subthread in the Xen patch thread has now digressed onto discussions > about entropy and security. Perhaps you guys could add some points. Well, I can try. I don't think this answers any questions, but perhaps it informs the discussion. Apologies if the Cc: list is getting a bit bloated. > On 11 May 2006, at 01:33, Herbert Xu wrote: >>> But if sampling virtual

Hi! As dom0 I''m running Ubuntu Hardy withe xen 3.3 from backports. Reason to using xen 3.3 is that I could get Intrepid stock kernel to work as domu with xen 3.2. Now the problem I have is that I can''t passthrough PCI-devices to my domu. If I run lspci in the domu nothing is returned. I''ve tried to use the kernel from Hardy (2.6.24-21-xen) and stock kernel from

Hi everyone! I have the following setup: domain0 |-domU1 |-domU2 |-domU3 I am running this with libvirt on a XEN server. Right now the server is connected to our office network, but later it will be in a hosted environment. I need domU1 and domU3 to have a public IP, and all of the domUs and the dom0 should have an internal IP address to communicate with each other. So this is what I would like

Hi When I am try to add Win2k to domain, I get a error message: "Error when attempting to join the domain MyDOMAIN" "No mapping between account names and security IDs was done" (such messages were in spanish. My Win2k is spanish version) I have the following setup - Linux Red Hat 9 (kernel-2.4.20-8) - Samba 2.2.7a - Samba as PDC using LDAP Already I have done all the

Dear, "Xenoppix-x86-64(Xen3.0.2+KNOPPIX-x86_64-5.0.1) CD size" is released. http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html Xenoppix-x86-64 exploits latest CPU (Intel Core2 Duo and AMD Athlon64). * Xenoppix-x86-64 boots both X86 and X86_64 linux kernel on HVM of Xen. * Xenoppix-x86-64 looks like KNOPPIX but all packages are replaced for X86_64. * Xenoppix-x86-64 also

We're running Samba 2.2.2 on an RS/6000 (AIX 4.3.3) using Windows 95 clients. We've tried the "hide files" and "veto files" option in smb.conf, but when the shares are mapped, we can still see the contents in Windows Explorer. We used the wildcard for all the contents of the shares (ex. hide files = /*.*/). The Samba manual only makes reference to Windows 98, so

I have at home two centos boxes: Box A - centos 6.4. gui version Box B - centos 7.1. minimal version. They are connected to 100Mb router (both boxes have 100Mb network adapters). Box B has software raid 1 and sata II interfaces.?On box B samba4 is installed and I copy files to samba share ( from box A to box B). Network monitor (iptraf-ng) shows only 20000 kbps of this copying operation. That is

Hi all. I have still network issues. I''m now able to connect two virtual domains with a bridge defined in domain0. But this is not what I want. I don''t want to affect domain0 in any way what means no network connections between the domain0 and the virtual domains. I just want to define a ''cross-over cable'' connecting eth0 of the first domU with the eth0 of the

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:03:21PM -0700, W Kern wrote: >Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we >threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling. > >Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an >older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file >I got a core2duo when it should have been

Hello: It used to work after I first setting up domain0 and all the guest OSs. Now suddently it won''t work to ping any servers from domain0. Strangely, if I launch any guest OSs on domain 0, those Guest OSs can ping any servers. Rebooting domain0 sometime works sometime won''t work. Any clues .... Thanks, xen __________________________________________________ Do You