similar to: Ruby Skype Bot

?I like your form css at http://www.pllite.com/projects/new Nice stuff! Stuart -----Original Message----- From: ian.connor at gmail.com Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 3:14 AM -07:00 To: instantrails-users at rubyforge.org Subject: [Instantrails-users] Instant Rails and your own applications Here is the download link for the Instant Rails version of ProjectLounge Lite.

Hi, It has been a few months coming, but we have finally released all our code into the glory of LGPL open source. The open access subversion repository is open and available for anonymous read access. If anyone wants to contribute code, please contact me with what you want to add. The basic features have calendar, tasks list, document sharing, member management, and notifications, all in a ruby

This is a very simple authentication system for a Ruby on Rails server in the same internet domain. It will allow you to get back the username of the person hitting your server provided they already have authenticated with an IBM Lotus/Domino or Websphere server that uses multi-server based session authentication. IBM Domino/Websphere authentication works by placing an encrypted cookie for a given

Hi, When I try to launch my ruby on rails server, it says my ruby gems version is not up to date. However it is. I''ve even tried reinstalling ruby gems to the latest version, but it still says I have an old version. Does anyone know how to fix this issue? I''d be deeply grateful. Here is some code directly from my terminal (I''m on an ubuntu system):

I've configured the bot to test lld and polly. The first batch of reports for the new tools are not ready yet, but anyone can monitor the build: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/Experimental/job/clang-stage2-coverage-R/ Matthias, I will ask around about adding a link to this bot on llvm.org once it graduates from the Experimental pane on greendragon. thanks, vedant > On Sep 23,

Folks, I'm scratching my head to understand what's wrong with this bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt/builds/7783/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio There were no recent commits to lnt or the test-suite and I've cleaned the lnt.venv on the bot, but it's still failing. I also haven't updated the packages or anything on the bot. Can any LNT specialist

Here's a link to a blog post that details how to automatically generate alias extension numbers for Skype callers. Since most phones won't let you type long a complex text strings, this makes it much easier to call back to folks on the Skype network. http://ssokol.blogspot.com/2009/09/automatic-asterisk-extensions-for-skype.html Enjoy, -S -- Steven Sokol Digium Inc. | Product Manager

Hi Tobi, I'm familiar with Zorg, but sometimes people have plans for existing bots I might not be aware of. Are there specific bots for linux/windows I should add this to, or should I leave the existing polly bots alone and create one or two new ones? Of course, Any change would be backward compatible to all other users of the builder. The plan would be have linux and windows cmake

All the MIPS buildbots are ready too. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev Sent: 25 May 2016 23:03 To: Chris Bieneman; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On

Hi Rick, Tobi, now that we have a way to link polly statically into the tools, we can turn on the windows polly build-bot. Let's speak about the config that the bot will run: ISL only (no CLooG), imath as a replacement for GMP, and cmake to configure llvm. The compiler will be MSVC 2013: we have verified that the current ISL version with the two patches that I sent out for ISL are compiling

LNT executes: cc_version = capture([cc, '-v', '-E'] + cc_flags + ['-x', 'c', '/dev/null', '-###'], include_stderr=True).strip() Then parses the result Perhaps that output has changed in an unexpected way? > On Aug 6, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:

As Davide suggests, most likely it's a bot software installation snafu. But the simpler sed script works perfectly, and I'll do that for now. I had understood that LLVM expected people to install GnuWin32, but maybe it's not sufficiently well specified about versions and whatnot. --paulr > -----Original Message----- > From: davide.italiano at gmail.com [mailto:davide.italiano

Thanks, Galina. It doesn't explain why the test worked on some bots but not this one, but Justin's workaround is okay with me. --paulr From: Galina Kistanova [mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 10:09 AM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Davide Italiano; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Problem with 'sed' on one Windows bot? There is nothing

The llvm-x86_64-linux-checks bot has been out of action for a few days. Does anybody know what's up? It's a pretty useful bot to have, so it would be nice to get it running again. Cameron

Hi Cameron, > The llvm-x86_64-linux-checks bot has been out of action for a few days. Does anybody know what's up? It's a pretty useful bot to have, so it would be nice to get it running again. it looks like the machine was rebooted and the buildbot did not automatically start itself on boot (it's supposed to but I don't think it ever worked properly). I've started it by

I have noticed that on IE, the @params[:commit] does not come through on image submit tags, but it does when the image is removed. this fails: <%= submit_tag( "Schedule", {:type => "image", :src=>"/images/buttons/schedulecard.gif", :alt=>"Schedule Card", :class=>"button"})%> but this works: <%= submit_tag(

> Connor, I just want to say thank you once again. You''ve done an > awesome job and provide a great contribution to the community. While > those in this thread beat each other to a bloody pulp over "who''s font > is larger" I will be enjoying your work and having even more fun > writing Rails applications because of it. Time to get annotating... >

While not asterisk specific related - would be interesting to see something similar done against straight voip calls. You could maybe plot it against e.164.org polls but I think this would be too small a sample set. Can anyone think of something else Asterisk related we could plot this against? Cheers, Dean http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/skype-24-hour-rolling-analyt ics.html

I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:54 AM Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re > going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. > > If you maintain bots please ensure that your bots are updated by end of > day 5/29 so that we can move on 5/30

Asterisk handling My Skype Calls This is for me, once more, Asterisk as the Future of Telephony. Today I've integrated my Skype Account as SIP extension in my * Box. This has been possible using "Uplink Skype to SIP Adapter", available for free at http://www.nch.com.au/skypetosip/index.html . Main features that any one can easily integrate into Asterisk: - Route skype incoming