similar to: Time taken Backup using ZFS Send Receive

It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file systems integrated into the main source. In reviewing the Change logs (URL''s below) I did not see anything mentioned that this had come to pass. Its going to be another week before I have a chance to play with b105. Does anyone know specifically if b105 has ZFS encryption? Thanks, Jerry -------- Original Message

It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file systems integrated into the main source. In reviewing the Change logs (URL''s below) I did not see anything mentioned that this had come to pass. Its going to be another week before I have a chance to play with b105. Does anyone know specifically if b105 has ZFS encryption? Thanks, Jerry -------- Original Message

Hi folks, I've been googling for an hour on this which seems to be awfully basic. But I cannot find anything definitive. [root at centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: Access denied [root at centos-gig ~]# setenforce 0 [root at centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory Have tried things like : chcon

Hello all! I've got CGYWIN running on an NT4 server, which in turn allows me to run Rsync as a daemon on this system. And might I say, it works most excellently, except for one flaw. It doesn't work on my raid drive(s). I have a 56 gig NTFS RAID5 drive running off an adaptec raid-port controller card. I have two other drives in this system, a 4 gig SCSI boot drive, and 60 gig IDE

Hi folks, I've been googling for an hour on this which seems to be awfully basic. But I cannot find anything definitive. [root at centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: Access denied [root at centos-gig ~]# setenforce 0 [root at centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory Have tried things like : chcon

On 07/18/2013 04:39 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:29 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> I built llvm and clang on my home mac which has just a normal mac os file >> system and everything seem to build just fine. >> >> Are there any requirements for needing linux style upper/lowercase file >> systems for llvm/clang tool

On Wed 07/01/09 20:31 , Carsten Aulbert carsten.aulbert at aei.mpg.de sent: > Brent Jones wrote: > > > > Using mbuffer can speed it up dramatically, but > > this seems like a hack> without addressing a real problem with zfs > > send/recv.> Trying to send any meaningful sized snapshots > > from say an X4540 takes> up to 24 hours, for as little as 300GB

Gents, I first installed the 32 bit version (as you might have read) of centos 4.2, after downloading x86_64 the install process/progress is about the same. going VERY slow... The screen for formatting the partitions took a LONG time (3 partitions 10 GIG, 2 GIG swap and 50 GIG). While on that screen and moving the mouse it lagged big time and could not keep up. Anyway just reporting that so far

I have a 29 Gig full backup on a remote server (lets call if fedor) that is called Kbup_1. I have a 1.3 Gig incremental backup on my local server. I have rsync 2.6.2 on both servers. Both are RedHat Linux 9.1 on i-686 hardware platforms. I issue the command "time rsync -avv --rsh=rsh --stats /test/Kibbutz/Kbup_1 fedor://test/Kibbutz". The synch takes ~5 minutes of real time and about

I am playing with a new machine I just got in and it is dying on boot... I'm wondering if it is to much machine for Centos to run.. It is a Generic machine using a Tyan Thunder motherboard running (8) eight dual core AMD 855 cpu's with 128 gig of ram, not 128 meg, but 128 gig of ram. (2) SCSI 146 Seagate Drives. ATI Graphics built onto the board. The error I'm seeing is on

Hello All. I have five Centos 4.4 x86_64 (amd fx-62) boxes with 4 gig of Corsair dual channel ram running kernel 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL (smp). The sixth box is the same except for video card and ram. It is using 8gig of GSkill dual channel ram and has a very cheap ATI video card in it. This box will segfault on boot unless I use noapic acpi=off and nolapic. Even with these boot params, the box is not

To All any help would be appreciated, I am running Redhat Linux Advanced Server release 2.1AS I do a uname -a and get the following 2.4.18-14smp I have samba 2.2.7-3.7.2 I have setup a share going from linux to windows and it seems to work fine up to 2 gig when it hits 2 gig it stops. Do I need to upgrade to a newer release of samba. Thank You Ralph Ralph Feole LogistiCare, Inc.

I got some R code that I don't understand. Question as comment in code //where is t comming from, what is phi inverse rAC <- function(name, n, d, theta){ #generic function for Archimedean copula simulation illegalpar <- switch(name, clayton = (theta < 0), gumbel = (theta < 1), frank = (theta < 0), BB9 = ((theta[1] < 1) | (theta[2] < 0)), GIG = ((theta[2] < 0) |

Trying to rsync a rather large file from a windows server to a centos server and all but this is working fine. As it's a 20 gig file I am trying to send the diff of with a -c, I suspect over the low bandwidth this presents an issue. I also stage this file locally on another centos server and could calc the diff and create a patch and send that, comparing checksums etc... A quick look at

> I just bought an 11" mac air for when I'm travelling or somewhere else that > is not at work and wanted to be able to do llvm work on it. > > I got the the 8 gig version but with a 128 gig flash drive because it seemed > to be enough but if I had to create another partition for llvm, then maybe I > should get the 256 gig version. > > It's not really a work

Ok, here's what iam trying on,, a compaq proliant 8500 server with 8 xeon 550mhz processors, 6 gig ram,, i just installed centos 4.1 on a proliant 3000 dual 550's and 2 gig ram and went smooth as silk, just got the 8500 and it seems to be in good order, but when i tried (twice) to install centos 4.1 it stalls shortly after a screen of stuff installing and the last two items are something

Hello, I have been having trouble with a Mandrake 10 Server. When I copy from one server to another I find that on completion of the Rsync command that the system still reports back that the memory is in use ( aprox 1 gig ). I have installed 1.5 gig of ram into the server and it made no difference. On the latest occasion I dropped back to single user and It didn't release the memory. There

I am curious about something. I have a friend that made a software raid 1 partition across a 250 gig 7200 rpm drive and an 80 gig 7200 rpm hard disk drive. he shut the system down normally to clean it out and when it came back up he gets the following: a superblock on /dev/md0 failed would mdadm --assemble --force fix it or lead to more damage? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17

I would like to do a How-To on installing CentOS 5 as the "only" OS on an new intel mac mini. The Machine: 1.83 Ghz Core 2 Duo 4 Gig Ram 320 Gig Hard Drive DVD/CDRW Intel 950 Apple USB Keyboard Apple Bluetooth Mighty Mouse. 20" Apple Cinema Display (DVI) Complete apple system. Why? I prefer running Linux on Apple Hardware. I would like to help people save time that want to

Hi This is a general question has anyone got Xen 3 to work with more than 4GIG of memory installed on there physical machine? I have tried 2 different machines with more than 4 GIG of memory with no success as yet. I can get Xen0 booting no problem, i run service xend start with no problem, i then run xm info and it sees more than 4 gig of memory available. Fantastic up to this point. After