similar to: Problem with Bridging ... and bge devices under FreeBSD 7.x?

Hello list! When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: ----- bs1% uname -a FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD 2008 root@bs1.sp34.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500

I am experimenting with a kvm virtual machine. At the moment I trying to configure iptables for the the host instance. In Xen terms I would call this Dom0 but I do not know the appropriate KVM term, if any. The setup I have is a single NIC (eth0) host bridged (bridge0). I want iptables to allow all host generated traffic (! bridge0 I think) and to check all other traffic for brute force

Hi, Whilst doing some QA work on XORP on my desktop, which has fxp0 and msk0, fxp0 got totally hosed. I was running PIM-SM and IGMPv2 router-mode on the box at the time. I wonder if this is related to the problems with fxp multicast transmission I saw back in April. I'm a bit concerned about this as fxp is still a very widespread and useful network chip. I am running

Hello, after upgrading my system from 7.1-RELEASE to recent RELENG_7 I noticed stalled network transfers in certain cases. I have an Intel PRO/100 ethernet adapter (card=0x00408086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x0c). In general networking works fine. I can ping hosts, surf on websites and so on. But if I send large files (>1 MB) to my server the transfer stalls after a few kilobytes. This concerns FTP

I've spent the past four days or so updating machines here to 4.8/9-stable via cvsup, and have done a complete make buildworld/kernel on each machine (some SMP, some single processor). It seems something is broken with the latest fxp driver, on each machine (different mobos and hardware configs) heavy network traffic with fxp NICs causes timeouts and random kernel panics. First machine to

Hi, this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board, Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x5720000 bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0 bge0: CHIP ID 0x05720000; ASIC REV 0x5720; CHIP REV 0x57200; PCI-E miibus0: <MII bus> on bge0 ... I have connected the ethernet to port labeled 0, but it appears as bge2, how can this be corrected? thanks, danny

Dear All, I have a FreeBSD box running 5.4-RELEASE-p8. Two interfaces: fxp0 - internet, SKA4 internal interface fxp0: <Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet> bge0 - internal with 30 vlans on it, old bge Gigabit 64/32 PCI-2.1 adapter. bge0: <Altima AC1002 Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x105> Firewall is pf with about 5000 rules. A week ago it was working just properly, but after adding more RAM

CentOS-5.5 # uname -a Linux inet05.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 17:52:25 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Can anyone tell me why I am seeing these error message? Specifically, why is TYPE=Bridge giving Unknown connection type 'Bridge'? Jan 13 08:25:31 inet05 nm-system-settings: Loaded plugin ifcfg-rh: (c) 2007 - 2008 Red Hat, Inc. To report bugs

Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal? FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12 CEST 2008 fxp0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc83f mem 0xe1021000-0xe1021fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci1 # ifconfig fxp0 fxp0:

Hi, I'm using system-config-firewall (C6 x86_64, fully up to date) to configure a gateway/firewall box. 2 nics, eth0 (configured as bridge0, mtu 7200) connected to the lan, eth1 being connected directly to the internet (public ip, mtu 1500). ssh port is open and accessible. nat is working fine. I've put bridge0 as a trusted interface, eth1 is masqueraded. I've put ports 20,21,80 as

Hello. I desire to get bridge network working using virt-manager. Centos 7 and centos 7 guest. >From researching I think I need to have a ifcfg-br0 file like this ? cat ifcfg-br0 DEVICE=nm-bridge0 STP=no TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.1.8 PREFIX=32 GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 IPV6INIT=no NAME=br0 ONBOOT=yes DELAY=0 Is that for sure needed ? The use that nm-bridge0 as the network name? I

Recent SUP. Installed on Dell PowerEdge 4600. Getting tons of: Sep 30 12:23:16 zige /kernel: bge0: gigabit link up Sep 30 12:23:46 zige last message repeated 98 times Also getting some TCP retransmits. This causes noticable delays in pretty much everything I do now. Not a problem prior to the SUP. I was on 4.8-STABLE before. When pulling/replacing cables, it went into a mode where it would

Hi all I've very big problem with my nfsd server. I'm running FreeBSD-stable and sometime (one time/week) i've this kind of message on the console : bge0 watchdog timeout problems fxp1 watchdog timeout problems and all my network card is down. Nothing can make the network card work again (only reboot working). There are only one service I need on this server and

Motherboard ASUS CUSL2-C with 815EP chipset and two Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet cards exibits the following. dmesg reports usual text only a few seconds after reboot. Later it displays a single line with a fragment of ipfw log, e.g. 167 213.131.11.152 in via fxp0 which seems to change with each new activity of ipfw. Files /var/log/dmesg.today and /var/log/dmesg.yesterday rotate daily as usual

On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Shaun Jurrens wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > #> Hi Shaun, > #> > #> Thanks for the input! Glad to hear I'm not the only one > #> > #> In my case, both the SCSI and NIC are integrated on the motherboard, so I > #> cannot really move them around... :) > #> > #> Also, as I

Hi, I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any success. Here is my configuration: ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-eth1: DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-bond0: DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 USERCTL=no ifcfg-bridge0: DEVICE=br0

Some interesting developments coming: <http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/96/html/6.1_Release_Notes/index.html>

Dear Sirs. It seems to me a never ending story. We run a box with a TYAN Thunder 2500 Dual SMP mainboard, 2GB ECC Tyan certified memory, AMI Enterprise 1600 RAID adapter and additional Intel 1000/Pro server type (64 bit) GBit LAN NIC. With FreeBSD 4.8 this was stable, but to achive this state was really hard! It is a story similar to that what happend when we changed towards FreeBSD

Hi, I have some problems getting tinc up and running an a Mac OS X and Linux machine. I was able to compile tinc on Linux and Mac and I configured it as fare as the daemons speak to each other (PING/PONG works fine, a -USR2 shows both edges). The problem is, that a real ping does not work. It gets sent over to the other machine but I never get a reply. Does anyone know why this happens? Note

Hi, I installed tinc on two of my server and it runs fine. But I have two problems: * if I try to ping my server via its tinc address I get a "Communication prohibited" error even though I know that the goal server should be open to communication. also, I would like to use ssh with the others in my vpn ( right now only my NeetBSD server ) but nmap says the port is filtrered. I made sure