similar to: TCP Stack Issues Under FreeBSD 7.1

Hi all, I think I'm experiencing a bad mbuf leak or something of the sort and I don't know how to diagnose this further. I have a machine at home that is mostly used for transcoding video for viewing on my TV via the multimedia/plexmediaserver port. This software runs in a jail and gets the actual files from my NAS via NFSv4. It's a pretty simple setup and sits idle unless I am

----- Original Message ---- > From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> > To: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za> > Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Robert Backhaus <robbak@robbak.com> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:12:03 AM > Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >

Hi, I have a Dell T710 with 4 X 10G ethernet interfaces (2 X Dual port Intel 82599 cards). It is running FreeBSD RELENG_8 last updated on July 13. What I see is packet loss (0 - 40%) on IPv6 packets in vlans, when the machine is not the originator of the packets. Let me try to describe a little more. If a neigbouring machine ping6 it, there will be packet loss. If it act as a router for ipv6,

Hi list, since we activated 10gbe on ixgbe cards + jumbo frames(9k) on 9.0 and now on 9.1 we recognize that after a random period of time, sometimes a week, sometimes only a day, the system doesn't send any packets out. The phenomenon is that you can't login via ssh, nfs and istgt is not operative. Yet you can login on the console and execute commands. A clean shutdown isn't possible

Hi All, Mysql service is going down continously in my system due to lack of memory space. I checked the messages log and found the following error message. All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7). I have no idea about mbuf cluster. Can anyone please help me to fix the issue. I hope the information below will help you. Following is the output of top. last pid: 84718; load

Box with fresh RELENG_7 panic under heavy network load (more than 50k connections). This panics seems to be senfile(2) related, because when sendfile disabled in nginx, I can't reproduce the problem. Backtrace in all cases like this: # kgdb kernel /spool/crash/vmcore.1 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General

Hi there, I have some DDOS(?) attack on my router going where my apache HTTP server is flooded with short-timed connections from some host. This results in LOTS of sockets in TIME_WAIT/LAST_ACK/CLOSING states and eventually I'm out of mbufs, which, consequently means I can't even connect to the router from LAN. The kern.ipc.nmbclusters is 2560, (I guess high enough for router with

Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with running out of mbuf clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down 1000-4000 connections, but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp 8192 mbuf clusters. I also tried setting maximum amount of mbuf clusters to 65536, but that only made the box hard-wire 86MB of 96MB RAM, making it just as unsuable as a dead machine. Of course, when the

Andre, Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable before 9.2? I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another release that can't do basic 10gigE when sufficient memory exists. If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do. -- Alfred Perlstein VP Software Engineering, iXsystems

Hi, When I use FreeBSD-6.0 Release (also FreeBSD-5.4), I found IPSEC can't coexists with MAC. When the IpSec is setup, and we connects the TCP server with IPSEC and MAC support, the server innevitably crack. Because the m_pkthdr of some mbuf is mangled by unknown reasons. Following is my kernel configuration: options MAC options MAC_DEBUG options UFS_EXTATTR options

Hello! I''m working on a guest OS port which uses NetBSD drivers, and I''m currently working on the netfront support. I''m basing the driver on the FreeBSD 7.0 driver, and I''ve run into a problem in network_alloc_rx_buffers. Parts of the code with line numbers is given below, and I''ll try to explain where the problem occurs. The basic problem is that

I finally got a 10G card that is recognized by FreeBSD (9.1-stable): ... ix0: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.4.8> port 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci4 ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors ix0: RX Descriptors exceed system mbuf max, using default instead! ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54

Hello List, I know 4.9 is ancient history, but unfortunately we have several thousand sites installed. We are in the process of moving to 6.1 when it is released. Right now I have an immediate problem where we are going to install two system at a HQ site. Each of the 2 systems will have two gre/vpn/ospf tunnels to a 100 remote sites in the field. The broadband will be a T3 with failover to

BM_207650 MEDIUM Vulnerability Version: 1 2/18/2004@03:47:29 GMT Initial report <https://ialert.idefense.com/KODetails.jhtml?irId=207650> ID#207650: FreeBSD Memory Buffer Exhaustion Denial of Service Vulnerability (iDEFENSE Exclusive): Remote exploitation of a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability in FreeBSD's memory buffers (mbufs) could allow attackers to launch a DoS attack.

I first met this problem when our (60 students) internetgateway refused to boot its new kernel, it was a 4.7-RELEASE. Then i loaded the old kernel and went home to check if my 4.8-STABLE does likewise. And the answer was yes! Both kernels were GENERIC + these options taken from the dummynet man pages: options DUMMYNET options NMBCLUSTERS options HZ When i boot the machine

In http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402260743.IAA18903 it seems RELENG_4 is vulnerable. Is there any work around to a system that has to have ports open ? Version: 1 2/18/2004@03:47:29 GMT >Initial report > <<https://ialert.idefense.com/KODetails.jhtml?irId=207650>https://ialert.idefense.com/KODetails.jhtml?irId=207650; >ID#207650: >FreeBSD Memory Buffer

Hello everyone, I am trying to tweak some of the sysctl tunables for the ix (ixgbe) driver in FreeBSD 9.2 since I am experiencing less than ideal performance and it seems like I can't find any: # sysctl -a | grep -i ixgbe device ixgbe I am running 9.2-RC4. Any input appreciated. Thanks, -- Rumen Telbizov Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>

Dear SIR's On Tru64 4.0F i get do you know how I can avoid it? Rgds Henrik PS. What should I expect on LDAP (got an error using --with-ldap): ============================================================================ ==== Compiling nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c In file included from include/includes.h:258, from nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:25: /usr/include/net/if.h:182:

Hi, I've encountered a strange problem while using FreeBSD 6.0 for our local mirror (mirror.math.uni-bielefeld.de) and thus is providing access via ftp, http, rsync and cvsup (all local and remote). The system crashes periodically with a kernel panic (panic: sbdrop). The uptimes between two crashes are going from a few hours to a few weeks. The system is a i386, Intel Pentium 4 based with

Hello, I post here my question after having spent time on google and forums and documentation to find a clue. I use: GNU/Linux RHEL5 x86_64 Samba Version 3.5.6 Active Directory 2003 on Windows 2003/2008 I want to allow an authenticated user (AD authenticated) to access a share partition under samba only if one of his secondary groups is a defined one. ex: user joe uid=4001(joe) gid=4010(domain