similar to: DNS samba update ERROR

Good day! Test the dynamic DNS updates # samba_dnsupdate --verbose IPs: ['200.2.2.15'] Looking for DNS entry A dcs3.BEO.IMP 200.2.2.15 as dcs3.BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb- 251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry NS BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry NS

Instead of the jpg image l write like this: DNS Master on the DC domain controller (Windows Server 2008 R2) DNS DC Reverse Lookup Zones beo.imp _msdsc dc domains gc pdc _sites .......... In the window - _msdsc

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:11:27 +0300 Bee Air via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Good day! > Test the dynamic DNS updates > > # samba_dnsupdate --verbose > IPs: ['200.2.2.15'] > Looking for DNS entry A dcs3.BEO.IMP 200.2.2.15 as dcs3.BEO.IMP. > Looking for DNS entry CNAME > 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as >

I have the closed local network with two domain controllers on MS Windows Server 2008 R2 DC - 200.2.2.1 , DC1 - ip 200.2.2. <http://2.2.2.2/>2. Local domain - BEO.IMP I installed the domain controller on debian 12 (Samba 4.19.1-Debian) DCS3 - ip 200.2.2.15 ?onnected to the domain and AD according to the article

On 12/08/2019 20:19, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Rowland, > did read, actually cited the page it myself, but didn?t help me to identify the cause. > Kerberos credentials exists, dns users exists, file permission are correct. So either that is insufficient or I am blind.. > Regards, Joachim > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

Ok, with the smb.conf change and then samba_dnsupdate --rpc-server-ip=192.168.177.19 --use-samba-tool --verbose I got no error messages. Shall I now revert the change? Monitor? At present samba_dnsupdate has nothing to do.. Thanks, Joachim -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Rowland penny via samba Gesendet: Monday, 12 August

On 03/07/2020 14:39, Robert E. Wooden via samba wrote: > As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. > > I have internet searched for solutions. > > I have done everything on > /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ > and I am still getting: > > At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose

As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. I have internet searched for solutions. I have done everything on /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ and I am still getting: At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names": dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 Failed update of 29

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 beo@sgs.o.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |beo@sgs.o.se Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |

On Friday, January 11, 2019 3:14 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >I have no idea where the above is coming from, but it isn't from the dhcp scripts. > I don't know what to tell you, Rowland. The previous logs were with the -d option in place, and those extra lines were what was added as a result of the -d option. Here is what the logs

On 7/3/2020 10:01 AM, Robert E. Wooden via samba wrote: > On 7/3/2020 9:50 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> Originally, Samba used /var/lib/samba/private for the dns.keytab and >> other dns files. This was then found to be possibly insecure, so it >> was decided to use /var/lib/samba/bind-dns instead. When you upgrade >> the Samba packages, the old files are not

-------- Mensaje original --------> ?> In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined it as a domain controller to my network.> ?> ? But I have a

On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: >> Here is what the logs show WITHOUT the -d option: >> >> Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: >> 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 Jan 11 10:00:36

? In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined it as a domain controller to my network. ? ? But I have a "dnsupdate_nameupdate_done: Failed DNS update with

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 3:14 AM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >I have no idea where the above is coming from, but it isn't from > >the dhcp scripts. > > > > I don't know what to tell you,

My OS is Ubuntu 20.04, with Samba version 4.15.13. bind is 9.16 I have an existing domain controller (compumaxdc01) and joined another (compumaxdc03) to act as a secondary/back according to the instructions on the wiki here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory Both are using bind-dns as the backend, so I've made sure to not use the dns.keytab in

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 11:20 AM, Billy Bob via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >     On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019

On 24/10/2020 15:44, Sonic via samba wrote: > I'm seeing a lot of these errors from a Samba 4.13.0 DC running on > Debian Buster, the smb.conf is untouched from that which was created > via a classic upgrade. > =============================== > Oct 24 10:25:43 srvr01 samba[26688]: [2020/10/24 10:25:43.886363, 0] > ../../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:352(samba_runcmd_io_handler)

I'm seeing a lot of these errors from a Samba 4.13.0 DC running on Debian Buster, the smb.conf is untouched from that which was created via a classic upgrade. =============================== Oct 24 10:25:43 srvr01 samba[26688]: [2020/10/24 10:25:43.886363, 0] ../../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:352(samba_runcmd_io_handler) Oct 24 10:25:43 srvr01 samba[26688]: /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: