similar to: Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

That's not a problem its just a ACL provisioning message as you can see the result was "DAG:DAD:PAI" but expected was "O:DAG:DAD:PAR" that's "normal" ;-) just ignore it or do a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" Am 19.10.23 um 17:27 schrieb bd730c5053df9efb via samba: > Hi! > > I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"

Hey, dir exisit.... root at dc01:/autofs/backup# ls -la /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz/ insgesamt 12484 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:02 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:00 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12765535 20. Nov 14:03 samba-backup-samba.laurenz.ws-2023-11-20T14-02-51.306281.tar.bz2 drwx------ 2 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:00 tmpdz6serc_ drwx------ 7 root

Full output: root at iob-master:~# samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/$(hostname -d) -U administrator Password for [SAMBA\administrator]: INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,639 pid:73781 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/join.py #1614: workgroup is SAMBA INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,640 pid:73781 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/join.py #1617: realm

System config:- bash-3.2# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.1.53 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 0:1e:8c:25:cc:a5 lo0:

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:34:19 +0100 Dirk Laurenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Full output: > > root at iob-master:~# samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 > --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/$(hostname -d) -U > administrator Password for [SAMBA\administrator]: > INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,639 pid:73781 >

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:02:59PM +0200, Yonatan Shtarkman wrote: > The attached code snippet?reproduces the issue when running: > python3 libugestfs_segfault_repro.py > > With: > guestfs version: 1.48.6 > guestfs-python version: 1.48.6 Can confirm with {python3-,}libguestfs-1.51.1-1.fc39.x86_64 The stack trace is roughly the same as yours. Rich. > Stacktrace: > #0

Dear samba experts, I did a classic upgrade from a Samba 3.6.14 samba NT4 DC to a Samba 4.18.2 AD-DC. It does not work and I just want to make sure that I have the correct understanding of our domain SID. On our old Samba server net getdomainsid shows: SID for local machine SERV00 is: S-1-5-21-1415314133-2460755331-2761616138 SID for domain NAV is: S-1-5-21-1415314133-2460755331-2761616138

Unable to connect to my HVM # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 3869 2 r----- 368.6 vm00 45 128 1 -b---- 62.3 The vm00 changes state from "r" to "b" after about a minute. (I have a fedora dvd in the drive.) #cat

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:31:08PM +0200, Yonatan Shtarkman wrote: > Hey, > When downloading a file whose path contains multi-byte utf-8, libguestfs > sometimes crashes. > This reproduces when using python, and not when using guestfish. > > Code to reproduce: > for i in range(2000): > ? ? g.download ('/xxx?', '/tmp/1') 'i' is not used inside the

Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

Hey, When downloading a file whose path contains multi-byte utf-8, libguestfs sometimes crashes. This reproduces when using python, and not when using guestfish. Code to reproduce: for i in range(2000): g.download ('/xxx?', '/tmp/1') #0 raise (sig=<optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 #1 0x00007ffff7fac140 in <signal handler called> () at

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this > shows that extended acls set, to see these: > > getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes: user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:24 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, that is what it is designed for. Yes, and yes it does! Thank you!!

G'day Guys, We are running Centos 6.4, samba4.0.10, compiled from tgz. Has anyone come up with this one before? samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File

Am 2017-05-23 um 20:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> Can I reset that somehow manually? > > If you are adding GPOs, then yes, by never running sysvolreset. I only did that after sysvolcheck failed! And I still get these problems in the GPO-management. I translate via googling: "A processing error occurred collecting data using this base domain controller." this one ?

Samba 4.4.2 I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies

Hi, First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event viewer, but seem that some change are not applied, why and where I can find some information, in samba log anv event viewer any error is reported Also I have tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset After this tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

Hi guys! I´m experiencing a problem with samba 4 policies and acl and i don´t known how it starded to do. Some problems like copy Policies, edit them, etc. It seems like permissions, but i´ve checked the list and can´t find a solution. Here are some outputs that i hope can help to understand: # Sysvol permissions: drwxrwxrwx+ 3 root DOMAIN\domain admins 4096 Mar 7 12:17 sysvol #

> You could try using a script Louis wrote, see here: > https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh > > The 'idmap config' lines are nothing to worry about, you cannot set them on a DC, but, for some reason, testparm etc warns about > them. > > Rowland > Sorry, I should have said - I ran louis' script and set the acl's according