similar to: ZFS root install

http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/tabriz#are_you_ready_to_rumble I''ve been running this for a couple of months on my desktop, which hold my home directory, more than the corp. specified number of years of email, etc. Experimental but quite stable. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance barts at cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts

Hi, I was just wondering if ZFS root is likely to be an install option any time soon, either in SXCR or the June Solaris update? The mechanism at Tabriz''s blog seem to work well, but it''d be nice to get it out of the box. -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/

> Matthew Ahrens wrote: > > Ross Newell wrote: > >> What are this issues preventing the root directory being stored on > >> raidz? > >> I''m talking specifically about root, and not boot which I can see > >> would be > >> difficult. > >> > >> Would it be something an amateur programmer could address in a > >>

The time has come to review the current Contributor and Core contributor grants for ZFS. Since all of the ZFS core contributors grants are set to expire on 02-24-2009 we need to renew the members that are still contributing at core contributor levels. We should also add some new members to both Contributor and Core contributor levels. First the current list of Core contributors: Bill

Hi All, I am looking at trying to understand the conceptual model of how data is grouped and partitioned within a storge pool. In looking at the on disk document that Tabriz sent out a few weeks ago I see that object sets are the grouping which ZFS uses to group objects that are related. Specifially to aid in format and layout of like objects in to a set. So, for example 1 potential object

Hi zfs-discuss, I have some questions about throttling on ZFS 1) I know that throttling is activating while one sync is waiting for another. (http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/roch?entry=the_dynamics_of_zfs) Is it possible to throttle only selected processes (e.g. nfsd) ? 2) How can I obtain some statistics about it? I want to know how often throttling is activating on my host etc. 3) Is it

Dear all, I noticed the following bug in points.formula > library(DAAG) > data(roller) > fm <- lm(depression ~ weight, data=roller) > plot( depression ~ weight, data=roller, type="n") > abline(fm) > attach(roller) > points( depression~weight, subset=1:7) > points( depression~weight, subset=8:10, col="blue") Error in if (length(x) == l) x[s] else x :

/* Cc: samba list */ Vincent Marty wrote: > Hi Ogi ! > Did you find a solution to the problem you described in a post in > linux.samba in dec 2004 ? > I get the same messages from Fedora Core 3 when accessing to a iMax > under Mac Os 10.3. Hi! Since I started to use Debian kernel 2.6.10 (in unstable), the problem disappeared. Fedora Core 3 uses 2.6.10 too so I don't know

Hey, I have a portable harddisk Western Digital 120GB USB. Im running Nevada b42a on Thinkpad T43. Is this a supported configuration for setting up ZFS on portable disks ? Found out some old blogs about this topic: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/artem?entry=zfs_on_the_go and some other info under: http://www.sun.com/io_technologies/USB-Faq.html Is this information still valid ? Under ZFS FAQ

Let me thank everyone in advance. I''ve read a number of posts here and it helped tremendously in getting the install done. I have a couple of remaining issues which I can''t seem to overcome. Here are the basics: dom0 - CentOS 5.2 32-bit Xen 3.2.1 compiles from source domU - os200805.iso The install config: [root@internetpowagroup oshman]# cat opensolaris.install name =

Working to get ZFS to run on a minimal Solaris 10 U2 configuration. In this scenario, ZFS is included the miniroot which is booted into RAM. When trying to share one of the filesystems, an assertion is raised - see below. If the version of source on OpenSolaris.org matches Solaris 10 U2, then it looks like it''s associated with a popen of /usr/sbin/share. Can anyone shed any

A bit of a perennial I'm afraid. My wife has filled up her iPhone 6 with photos, and wants them moved onto my computer. I'm running CentOS 7 patched about 30 minutes ago. Needless to say the computer can't see the data on the iPhone, though it does recognise the phone as an iPhone. Any suggestions (well any that don't involve a steam roller, sledge hammer or GBH to the whole of

I have 2 internal disk drives, that I would like to mirror. Can I do that with zfs? If so, how? Thanks -Troy

This e-email serves to announce the release of the on-disk format specification (draft version) for ZFS. This document can be viewed in pdf format from the opensolaris zfs community (http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs). Comments and questions can be sent to zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org. Happy Reading Tabriz Leman

Is it possible to have a route stick in the kernel, even if device it points to goes to roller coaster up and down drive. For example. I have an ADSL modem and am doing VPN over it. There's a route needed for VPN added like this: ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 1.2.3.4 src 192.168.2.1 There are two problems with it: a) if ADSL link is down when above command is executed, the route

I have a fresh install of Suse 10.1 and wine 9.21 and tried to install roller coaster tycoon for some fun. However the installer quickly dies silently. I've tried using different versions of wine with no succes. The frustrating thing is that on different versions of Suse this installed beautifully. I've tried using winetools to set up my ~.wine, but still $wine setup.exe gives me

Hello, we have the following problem: - a new Dell Optiplex 740 boots pxelinux.0 - loads the kernel - start to load the miniroot.gz and crashs after loading about 1/5 of the miniroot The tftpd messages are: Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started (0.7) Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Serving /linux/pxelinux.0 to 10.10.100.113:2070 Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006

> Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:40:08 -0700 > From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> > Reply-To: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> > To: Joel Konkle-Parker <jjk3@msstate.edu> > Subject: Re: [Wine]Guild Wars Client > Cc: wine-users@winehq.com > > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> > wrote: >>

hi all, I am hoping to move roughly 1TB of maildir format email to ZFS, but I am unsure of what the most appropriate disk configuration on a 3510 would be. based on the desired level of redundancy and usable space, my thought was to create a pool consisting of 2x RAID-Z vdevs (either double parity, or single parity with two hot-spares). using 300GB drives this would give roughly 2.4TB of usable

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:06:52PM -0500, fred roller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> > wrote: > > > dd if=/dev/sdb of=os.img bs=1M count=3210 > > > > I would recommend bs=512 to keep the block sizes the same though not a huge > diff just seems to be happier for some reason and add status=progress if > you