similar to: System hangs while removing disc from d1000

Greetings, Last April, in this discussion... http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=143517 ...we never found out how (or if) the Sun 6120 (T4) array can be configured to ignore cache flush (sync-cache) requests from hosts. We''re about to reconfigure a 6120 here for use with ZFS (S10U4), and the evil tuneable zfs_nocacheflush is not going to serve us well (there is a ZFS

I''m experiencing a problem with XenEnterprise migration for a Windows 2008 server VM where a large % of the time I notice a 45-50 sec delay after the VM has been migrated to the other side. I''m wondering if anyone in this list is using XenEnterprise and has tried W2k8 migrations. Thanks in advance. W2K8 online migration delays guest execution 45-50 seconds Posted: Mar

Answering my own question again, after several days of searching I've again found the solution within minutes of posting a question here. The answer to the NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE is that you need to create the /etc/krb5/krb5.keytab file: http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5216293&messageID=9877661 And the windows permission setting problem appears to be due to a lack of

Starting from this thread: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=118786&#118786 I would love to have the possibility to set an ISCSI alias when doing an shareiscsi=on on ZFS. This will greatly facilate to identify where an IQN is hosted. the ISCSI alias is defined in rfc 3721 e.g. http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3721.html#sec-2 and the CLI could be something like: zfs set

Hi! Besides wishing y''all a Merry Christmas! :), I have the following question: when is the bug (is this a bug?) planned to be fixed, that the clock goes like crazy under Win in a domU? The closest thing I could find is here http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=147903 , but that is not the same. Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, there was discussion on "truncating aggregation output only" (http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=19008) on DTrace forum. From what was discussed the aggregation options like aggsortrev, aggsortkey, aggsortpos, aggsortkeypos are already available (Thanks Bryan!). I am wondering what are current plans for ''aggtop'' option (or

filesystem is used In-Reply-To: <28AA25C5-C067-49EA-917A-630D663FA2A2 at Sun.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OpenSolaris-URL: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=73560&tstart=0#73560 Yep, another "hg pull", followed by a nighly recompile and bfu fixed the problem. The box

Hello the list, I thought that it should be easy to do a clone (not in the term of zfs) of a disk with zpool. This manipulation is strongly inspired by http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=135038 and http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/ But unfortunately this doesn''t work, and we do have no clue what could be wrong on c1d0 you have a zfs root create a

https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=481859&#481859 https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=453572&#453572 This is a timebomb waiting to strike so many people who like do daily snapshot backups and keep them for few weeks and not realizing their snapshots are useless if they had accidentally mess up some boot related file earlier on. Another scenario you mess

I want to import my zpool''s from FreeBSD 8.0 in OpenSolaris 2009.06. After reading the few posts (links below) I was able to find on the subject, it seems like it there is a differences between FreeBSD and Solaris. FreeBSD operates on directly on the disk and Solaris creates a partion and uses that... is that right? Is it impossible for OpenSolaris to use zpool''s from FreeBSD?

Bouncing a thread from the device drivers list: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=357176 Does anybody know if OpenSolaris will support this new Supermicro card, based on the Marvell 88SE6480 chipset? It''s a true PCI Express 8 port JBOD SAS/SATA controller with pricing apparently around $125. If it works with OpenSolaris it sounds pretty much perfect. --------------

Trying to boot my Thinkpad T30 with Solaris snv_81 xVM it get the error message This version of Solaris xVM does not support this hardware The output of "echo ::interrupts | mdb -k" while booted without xVM is bash-3.2# echo ::interrupts | mdb -k IRQ Vector IPL(lo/hi) Bus Share ISR(s) 0 0x20 14/14 - 1 cbe_fire 1 0x21 5/5 ISA 1 i8042_intr 3 0x23

I''m still trying to find a fix/workaround for the problem described in Unable to mount root pool dataset http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=492460 Since the Blade 1500''s rpool is mirrored, I''ve decided to detach the second half of the mirror, relabel the disk, create an alternative rpool (rpool2) there, copy the current BE (snv_134) using beadm

Hi all, Sometimes the process cdrommon use 99,8% of CPU and the result is that all vms becames very slow. I killed the process and now everything is fine but I can''t live migrate VMS. I found this problem also in this citrix thread: http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1475962 <http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1475962&tstart=0#1475962>

System: snv_151a 64 bit on Intel. Error: panic[cpu0] assertion failed: zvol_get_stats(os, nv) == 0, file: ../../common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c, line: 1815 Failure first seen on Solaris 10, update 8 History: I recently received two 320G drives and realized from reading this list it would have been better if I would have done the install on the small drives but I didn''t have them at the time.

Your install dir has a whitespace. Have you tried quoting? e.g. <LLVMInstallDir>"C:\Program Files (x86)\LLVM"</LLVMInstallDir> Best regards, Rafael Auler On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Eric Mader <emader at gmx.us> wrote: > I changed tooset-vs2013.props to this: > > <Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003" >

Hi experts, I have few issues about ZFS and virtualization: [b]Virtualization and performance[/b] When filesystem traffic occurs on a zpool containing only spindles dedicated to this zpool i/o can be distributed evenly. When the zpool is located on a lun sliced from a raid group shared by multiple systems the capability of doing i/o from this zpool will be limited. Avoiding or limiting i/o to

I replaced all instances of "$(Platform)" with "x64" for the x64 .props file and it still fails, so it looks like that guess was wrong as well. Regards, Eric On 9/29/14, 2:11 PM, Eric Mader wrote: > Quoting doesn't seem to make a difference. Strangely, the Win32 > toolset seems to work. (Where "work" means that clang runs and > produces a bunch of

Hi list, Saw that there''s a patch for xenserver 5.6fp1 which should fix this: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX129267 Anybody know if/when this will happen on XCP? I have the same problem - disk usage remains the same after snapshot deletion - this is in the log on the pool master: vhd-util: libvhd::vhd_validate_footer: invalid footer cookie: ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ This guy has the same

Hi, How can I use "vhd-util" or "vhd-update"? Have someone a manual for this? A tutorial? Any help? I found this link (http://forums.citrix.com/message.jspa?messageID=1373599), but this link have a poor information. No examples. Anyone have an examples? Thanks. -- Roberto Scudeller Especialista Linux/Unix beto.rvs@gmail.com beto_rvs@yahoo.com.br