similar to: WAN setup over frame relay 7 locations

Hi. I've an asterisk box with 2 nics, one with a local ip 192.168.1.xxx and the other with a public ip. The default route is via the public ip route. I need to use sip on both ends, since I have phones on the lan and on the internet... but.. if I set bindaddr=0.0.0.0 in sip.conf, I had that error messages: Jun 19 13:07:21 WARNING[7176]: File chan_sip.c, Line 386 (__sip_xmit): sip_xmit of

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

In /etc/shorewall/masq I have: eth0 eth1 eth0 vmnet1 eth0 vmnet8 ------------- eth0 is my default route to the Linksys router connected to the cable modem. eth1 is my connection to 192.168.1 subnet and it is the gateway for all other machines on this subnet. My routing table is: # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table Destination

Hi! Is it HTB fully compatible with BOND interface? I have this setup (mode= fault tolerance) : BOND0 -> ETH0 + ETH1 BOND1 -> ETH2 + ETH3 ( http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt ) HTB work very well with Class over BOND0. If I add Class for BOND1 it generate balance errors. Also with HTB.init

Hello, I have problems with installation of my second DomU. I cannot ping it from the outside world and I cannot access outside world from this domain. I see it from Dom0 and my first DomU, same as my second DomU can ping Dom0 and my first DomU. I use xen 3.0.3 on ubuntu 6 LTS. DomU is running on debian. I also network-bridge script in the xend config.

I have two interfaces on a centos machine with IPs 192.168.2.15 and 192.168.3.15. The routing table is: # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.3.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 *

I have a three tinc server setup, similar to "4.3 How Connections Work" using the configuration mostly likehttp://ostolc.org/site-to-site-vpn-with-tinc.html The clients (Ubuntus, Debians and Windows 10s) can all ping (and SSH) to each other remotely. As far as that is concerned it's working great - thanks so much for some great software. However, on each of the Tinc servers (A and

Hello, I have a Debian-Woody-3.0 Router with 3 NIC''s. Kernelversion 2.4.18 +------------+ +-------------+ | | | | |192.168.1.1 | | 192.168.2.1 | | DSL-Router | | ISDN-Router | +------------+ +-------------+ | |

hi, i''ve tried again Debian testing, with xen 3.1 binary. it works fine but i can''t have the networt working: i''ve have an ethernet card with static IP: 172.20.2.160 gateway: 172.20.2.1 uname -r :2.6.18-xen without xen, the network works fine. here''s my output: eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:FE:6B:57:32 inet adr:172.20.2.160

Lastest Modifications: HOST A: Removed 2 route add as you suggested, and it's still working. HOST B: This host has a openwrt as gateway and I added few days ago as you suggested on freenode and this is HOST B Gateway route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 10 0

Hi Ivo, --On Freitag, 23. Juni 2000 01:15 +0200 Ivo Timmermans <zarq@icicle.yi.org> wrote: > I'm not sure I fully understand your patch. This is not so important since I'm trying to get 1.0pre2 running. Although I had no luck so far, I'll point out what's going wrong at the end of this mail. > For instance, you force a > key exchange when the connection is made,

While I''m in temporary retirement, I''ve decided spend a little time experimenting with new things and making some updates to the web site. The biggest result of this effort to date has been: http://shorewall.sf.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html This outlines how to use Squid as a transparent proxy running on the firewall, in the DMZ or in the local network. In the latter two

Hi! I have a problem with my new Xen setup. I have installed Debian etch with netinstall and I''m using 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel in my dom0 and 3.0.3-0-4 version xen hypervisor. I''m using four network cards on my system and using three of them as xen bridges and dom0 is using the fourth one only for it''s own. So basicly both of my virtual servers use a network card

I am trying to setup GRE between two CentOS 4.5 boxes. I have tried several variations of what''s listed below, but none of them work. box1: modprobe ip_gre ip link set gre0 up ip tunnel add gretun mode gre local 66.1.1.161 remote 66.1.2.161 ttl 20 dev eth0 ip addr add dev gretun 10.253.253.1 peer 10.253.253.2/24 ip link set dev gretun up ip route add 10.2.0.0/16 via 10.253.253.2 box2:

Hi All, I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration for your reference. Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, 10.0.0.1) ?----------------? INTERNET ?-------------? COMPANY (Windows 7 PC,192.168.2.1, 10.0.0.2) ?------------? COMPANY (SERVER ZONE) ?----? SERVER A

I installed a new CentOS-6.3 kvm guest on a recently provisioned kvm host also running CentOS-6.3. This guest will not connect to the network and the host cannot connect to it via its public IP address. I had previously installed a guest system on thst same kvm host using the same ISO and that system connects to the network without problem. I next created a third guest isntance and this too does

I installed a new CentOS-6.3 kvm guest on a recently provisioned kvm host also running CentOS-6.3. This guest will not connect to the network and the host cannot connect to it via its public IP address. I had previously installed a guest system on thst same kvm host using the same ISO and that system connects to the network without problem. I next created a third guest isntance and this too does

Hi list. I started with Xen yesterday, but I am facing a bit of a problem. My system had always configure eth0 with 10.0.0.4/8 I am using Xen unstable source (on Debian sid) Now I installed Xen, rebooted the machine, and first the usual network is coming up and then the xend will be started. I''ll end up with this, but I am wondering if this should be the way of things to be

Dear Friends, I have been using shorewall for some years. I want to set up "shorewall 2" router behind firewall, accordind to this picture: I have lost at setuping "zone"-s (wifi, lan1, net). Plese help me ! Thanks, psw net | | SHOREWALL 1 ------- lan 1 | | |wifi | | SHOREWALL 2 ------- lan 2 | ---------------- lan 3

A number of weeks ago I had huge help from many of you configuring routing on a server with multiple Internet facing nics. Thanks for all of your help!!!! I am still having a routing issue that I am hoping someone can help me tweek. This server, besides acting as our gateway to the internet, is also our web and email server. The server has 4 nics. Two are connected to the internet and the