similar to: Samba 4.7.8 Available for Debian Stretch (amd64/i386)

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: wishlist [resending from another address since my ISP seems to be queueing emails for up to 25 hours and counting...] I did some experiments with the xen remus HA system. With overlord3:~$ debdiff xen_4.0.1-1.dsc xen_4.0.1-1lindi1.dsc diff -Nru xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real --- xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2010-08-02

Here is a patch to the Debian xen-3 3.4.0-1 package that reenables ioemu. I have been using it for the last four weeks. (I understand there are reasons this cannot go into Debian yet, but hopefully it will be useful to people that depend on running HVMs today.) Anders -------------- next part -------------- --- xen-3/debian/changelog +++ xen-3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xen-3

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: wishlist I did some experiments with the xen remus HA system. With overlord3:~$ debdiff xen_4.0.1-1.dsc xen_4.0.1-1lindi1.dsc diff -Nru xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real --- xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2010-08-02 16:10:13.000000000 +0300 +++ xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2011-01-05 00:32:41.000000000 +0200 @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@

Hai, ? We have noticed a depency that was missing in the latest 4.10.6 builds.? Affected are Debian Stretch and Buster. ? If you where running samba 4.10.5 and upgraded you might not?notice this problem. If you did not use samba-tool, you might not have noticed it. New installs?and people building from my sources did noticed it. ? Thank you guys for the reports ! @Marcio Demetrio Bacci

Hai...   Finaly im passed all errors, some problem with meself.. , some the code. ..    Lots of thank to the samba devs, that gave the clue to fix the last parts. :-)) whoehoe..   Its still in the stretch-experimental repo, and if the feedback is ok, i'll make the final build tomorrow. Testing can be done with Debian Stretch or Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 or Devuan ASCII AMD64 only.   #setup: get

Hai.   It did take some time, but here they are..  Debian Stretch Samba 4.7.0 Packages, rebuild from debian experimental, with small modifications. ( see changelogs below )   I've tested a bit with my new 4.7 debian samba package and it looks ok to me, but these first tests are in a clean environment. I did a upgrade from 4.5.8 to 4.7. AD and Member. ( samba + internal DNS was tested,

V4 of the patch, incorporating Bastian's suggestions. Jon --- xen/debian/patches/series | 1 + xen/debian/patches/tools-ocaml-fix-build.diff | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/debian/rules | 5 ++ xen/debian/rules.real | 39 ++++++++++++ xen/debian/templates/control.main.in | 16 +++++

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-arm at lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet! Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Hi, This email is mainly addressed at Waldi (Bastian Blank). I'm resending it since the previous one is waiting for approval due to its size being bigger than 40k (I compressed the .diff this time, so it should be ok). I have worked on enhancing the current packaging of Xen 4.1.1 over the last weeks. The main goal was to package the OCaml libraries of Xen as separated binary packages, and

xen source: lintian output: 'license-problem-gfdl-invariants stubdom/grub.patches/00cvs invariant part is: with no invariant sections, with the front-cover texts being a gnu manual, and with the back-cover texts as in (a) below', automatically rejected package. xen source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. xen-utils-4.11: lintian output:

Hello, I have download the current vorbis and vorbis-tools trunk today using subversion. I am using debian testing and tried to build the debs using dpkg-buildpackage. The process went smoothly with vorbis but failed with vorbis-tools. Being more specific to compile vorbis-tools I do: 1) Download source using svn co http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/vorbis-tools/ 2) Run autogen.sh 3) Run

These were flagged by the [Lintian] [spelling-error-in-binary] rule. [Lintian]: https://github.com/Debian/lintian [spelling-error-in-binary]: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/spelling-error-in-binary.html Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name> --- v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py | 4 ++-- v2v/rhv-upload-vmcheck.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

> On 30 March 2018 at 15:08 "A. Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote: > > > Hello, > > to build + packages dovecot I use the usual Debian tool chain. That includes build with selected GCC options and running lintian. > > I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings: > > I: dovecot-core:

Thanks very much for the responses on my last three issues. I've incorporated the appropriate changes into the budding Debian package. I feel embarrassed to raise this one, but in the interests of shutting lintian up maybe this could be fixed at some point: I: hivex: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man1/hivexregedit.1.gz reencode re-encode I: libhivex-perl: spelling-error-in-manpage

Hello, to build + packages dovecot I use the usual Debian tool chain. That includes build with selected GCC options and running lintian. I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings: I: dovecot-core: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/dovecot/auth N: N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc N:

Hai Guys, ? The following has been done:?4.10.6?for Debian Buster (10) is ready. Short version of the changes: The settings are updated with latest Official Debian Samba packages, and its more focused on builds with python3. ? The changes logs of these changes, including the debian changes. ( see below ) Repo Info?: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ Buildlogs?: http://downloads.van-belle.nl/ ? ---?

Hi, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marcio Merlone via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 19 maart 2020 20:59 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] One more upgrade question > > Great, many thanks! > > I expect to also upgrade some 4.7 member file servers on a further >

I'm trying to test a trivial patch to set FD_CLOEXEC on the flintlock lockfd when using F_OFD_SETLK and am running into a build failure even in an unpatched state. This is on a Debian jessie amd64 system building the jessie-backports version. The stable version (1.2.19-1+deb8u1) works and builds fine using the same commands, however I also encountered a similar build problem in a sid chroot

========================================================= "Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet." Jean-Jacques Rousseau ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.7 release series. Changes since 4.7.7: -------------------- o Jeremy Allison <jra at

========================================================= "Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet." Jean-Jacques Rousseau ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.7 release series. Changes since 4.7.7: -------------------- o Jeremy Allison <jra at