similar to: 4.5 -> 4.8 samba fails to start

further testing, log reading and googling has revealed further possible problem sources... with ipv6? my syslog shows the following errors: --- Mar 12 18:08:10 ADServer samba[2161]: [2015/03/12 18:08:10.134418, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:488(binary_smbd_main) Mar 12 18:08:10 ADServer samba[2161]: samba: using 'standard' process model Mar 12 18:08:10 ADServer samba[2238]: [2015/03/12

Just updated a DC from 4.1.6 to 4.1.7. After the update, it appears to be unable to bind any listening ports with the error NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER_MIX. This is on CentOS 6.5, running samba 4.1.7 RPMs from sernet. Just as a test, I did a brand new samba-tool provision, and still get the same results when starting, so I don't think it's anything in my configuration, unless there

Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >> >> $ rm test.txt >> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >> >> cannot remove: >> OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan >> OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite >> OS X 10.9.5

G'day Guys, I've hit a snag. After using S4 from Alpha, beta, rc, 4.0.1..16 with success, I wanted to upgrade to the 4.1 series. However, after compiling, installing, and provisioning, with no errors, samba4 won't start correctly. I did a few tests by installing from scratch, on the same server each of the following versions (4.0.17, 4.0.18, 4.0.19, and 4.1.9), and got the same

Hi, after a successfully migrating my NT4 with OpenLDAP to a Samba4 AD...I got a problem. Like in the sambawiki tutorial (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configuring_LDAP_over_SSL_(LDAPS)_on_a_Samba_AD_DC) I tried to configure LDAPS. I used the auto-configured certs. They are located in "/var/lib/samba/private/tls". My smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] netbios name = PDC

Hai, Yes that is know. Enable and change the range to a, for you usable range, outside the current ranges. Example: idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 Now start samba and winbind. And posting you smb.conf really helps of analyze things like this. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Helpp! :) We didn't catch this in testing and now it's killing me in production! I'm getting stuck with my fresh build of Samba 3.6.10. It isn't honoring groups specified in the valid users clause of the share configuration. I'm running in security = SHARE mode, and user authentication is working just fine. Even if I specify individual users on the valid users = line, it

Hi, I'm currently trying the 3.2 version of winbindd (pam + nss + winbindd). I would like to loging with the userPrincipalName on ? Win 2k3 but I can't. Winbindd retrun NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER_MIX (PAM: 4) Any idea winbindd --version output : Version 3.2.0pre2-GIT--e 85eec1d-test My smb.conf file : [global] security = ads realm =

Hello!  I had working Samba installation on openSUSE Tumbleweed server.  I made my previous OS update a month ago, and everything worked fine after it.  But today I updated the OS again, and smb.service failed to start. Version 4.9.1-git.96.c3bff26bf16SUSE-oS15.5-x86_64 I tried many things: - minimal config - removed Samba package with all the dependencies and installed it again and so

Hello all ! Since a few weeks now i have lots of problem transfering files from windows clients to my samba nas. It just hangs and acts like it losts connection to the samba nas allthough when i just browse or read there is no trouble.Also if i launch a transfer from scp on a linux or with a soft like total commander or filezilla, there are also no problem. It's very strange and annoying. Does

[Image: http://pixhost.info/avaxhome/7c/a3/0017a37c_medium.jpeg ] DSS CATIA V5R19 SP9 Win32 Update Only | 1.13 GB CATIA V5 is the leading product development solution for all manufacturing organizations, from OEMs through their supply chains to small independent producers. The range of its capabilities allows CATIA V5 to be applied in a wide variety of industries, such as aerospace, automotive,

A couple of questions about the above: 1. In their respective man pages, both refer to "NTFS alternate data streams?, however they are not limited to just NTFS ADS are they? Other file systems may also use ADS (such as Mac OS?s various fs) 2. What is the essential differences and similarities between the two? From the man pages it appears that: - xattr has default prefix (which can be

On 26/12/15 17:33, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: >> On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. >>> >>> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. >>> >>> smb.conf: >>> path = /export/test1/ >>>

I?m not sure if this is related, but there was a regression a while back in handling resource forks in folder icons. It was supposed to be fixed in 4.10.13 but I don?t think it quite works yet and I haven?t had the time to test it further yet. -Perttu > On 30 May 2020, at 21.00, Martin Steiner / 3MF GmbH via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I changed the configuration

I worked with Netatalk for years and want to switch to Samba now. Currently i use Ubuntu 20.04. and Debian 9 before, i had no issues with netatalk at all. As soon as i try to add a color tag (e.g. yellow) with Mac OS 10.15.5, the tag appears shortly but hides one second later. The file system is ZFS with no special options configured. I tried the Ubuntu package but also the builds from source

Hi, i'm running Samba 4.2.1 compiled from source on an Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS Server. ACL/XATTR is active and working. I tried to activate the vfs_fruite module and added the sample code: vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:resource = file fruit:metadata = netatalk fruit:locking = netatalk fruit:encoding = native to the share. In addition i tried the following share definition: vfs

Am 15.06.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Ralph B?hme: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:57:52PM +0200, Sascha Kasch wrote: >> dear list, >> >> thanks for the great fruit speed-improvements. but... >> >> server config: >> debian 8 jessie >> sernet samba 4.2.2 packages >> >> here we see a problem that might not only be fruits problem but >> results in

I changed the configuration and raised the log level, in my opion samba tries to access the non existent double files. Samba is now probably writing the data in a netatalk compliant way in the extended attributes of the file but is not reading it. new configuration: [Global] min protocol = SMB2 vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:metadata = stream fruit:resource = stream fruit:encoding

I must reply to my own post. Changing the fruit:locking to "none" results in a working share. Netatalk 3.1.6 is installed and from the information of the changelog Netatalk 3.1.7 doesn't change anything to the file locking (except if you're using Solaris). Am 25. April 2015 bei 12:16:20, Christian Kovacic, MA (chris.k at gmx.at) schrieb: Hi, i'm running Samba 4.2.1

Hi, I previously had an issue that was fixed by implementing vfs_fruit. For reference: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199583.html <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199583.html> I’m running Samba 4.2.11 on FreeBSD 10.0 release and our shares are on ZFS. Our macs are on OS X 10.11.4. What I had previously was this: vfs objects = zfsacl Which I then