similar to: [4.3.11-Ubuntu] SMBD keeps Locks on NTUSER.DAT and ntuser.ini after logout

Hi @ALL Trying to migrate to Samba AD after 12 lucky years with samba NT-domain + server profiles and homes in a small research institute. I decided to provision a new domain and create the users and groups using samba-tool with most of its parameters. I decided against classicupgrade, because I didn't get all posix attributes automatically set and I cannot do LDAP kung-fu. Intention is to

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) rawi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi @ALL > > Trying to migrate to Samba AD after 12 lucky years with samba > NT-domain + server profiles and homes in a small research institute. > > I decided to provision a new domain and create the users and groups > using samba-tool with most of its parameters. > I

Hello, I've a virtual machine working as a samba server ("clear linux release 28640", whose relevant information are in the attached file "server_clearmi_28640.txt"). The samba client is an android 4 virtual machine (https://www.android-x86.org/releases/releasenote-4-4-r5.html). I can succesfully mount samba shares from the android "terminal emulator", with the

Hi, We have 5 Samba domain controllers, and 4 file servers. All are 4.2.10-Debian. Our file servers have been working fine until recently (on the 26th), when suddenly access to the \\users.store.example.com\user share (hostname p-cats) became extremely slow. Access to other shares on other machines is fine, and users is 128G total (smaller than other shares). The machine isn't under

I am running samba 4.5.1 on Ubuntu 16.04. The samba server is running as an AD DC and stores the user profiles, the clients are all windows 10 professional. One user reported being locked out of the profile pretty regularly. After investigating the case I saw that a lot of files in the profile are still locked even after logging out and shutting down the system. After restarting the samba server,

I have a Linux server and this is my output from smbstatus: Samba version 4.9.5-Debian PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8758 nobody nogroup

Of course, the sysvol is located on a windows controller from the forest. mount -t cifs -o username=domain_admin_user //windowsDC.myDomain.local/SYSVOL /mnt/smb/sysvol and copied the files with -R --preserve to /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ Below logs are provided from /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd file. regards, On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

Hello, I have manually mounted the SYSVOL share, sync it with samba and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. But I'm not sure if all windows policies are acceptable by samba because of errors logs: 2015/03/18 09:30:52.197934, 0] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:338(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file myDomain.local/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Registry.pol --

I noticed one of my smbd processes for one particular client (IUSR_JUNIPER) is taking 200MB in memory, far different from all the other smbd processes. Should I be concerned about a memory leak here? I don't think samba would be caching any files, so I can't see why it'd use this much memory. That windows client is a win2k IIS5 server, with well over 60 sites that are hosted off a

Dear all, I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12 On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them. After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well, We get on windows when we try to open the network drive

Hi I have problems with Samba and hope some of you can help me. Below if I have add the error messages that are relevant. [root at roskilde mosek]# emacs /var/log/samba/log.172.16.0.108 File Edit Options Buffers Tools Help [2014/02/06 10:18:29.562405, 0] smbd/oplock.c:330(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file windows/intel/Composer-XE-2013.198/Documentation/csupport.txt --

Hello. I just upgrade my kernel, smbd and changed my smb.conf. (4.14.12-1-Arch" to "4.14.19-1-lts") "samba 4.7.4-1" But now, "reload smbd" and "close-share" can not drop connected users to share. Because of that I have to restart smbd service for destroy a share right now. But it was working previous version and I don't know what is wrong right

Hi, I'm new to the list, so "hello everybody" ... I have a (big) problem wih my new PDC under samba with ldap auth. When I start a new session, samba launch multiple instances of smbd for this new user in 5-10 minutes ... The system is very slow on the client and finish to crash and need to close the session. But, when I close the session, the smbd processes aren't

Hello, I would like to how to do to kill the locked files from a useraccount by multiple smbd pids automatically when the session is closed? #### Details Samba server: Release: 5.10 Kernel architecture: sun4u Application architecture: sparc Hardware provider: Sun_Microsystems Kernel version: SunOS 5.10 Generic_142909-17 Samba version: Samba version 3.5.6 Smb.conf file section Global: #

Hi, I'm sharing an NFS mounted directory via samba. When a client connect to the share, he can browse it fine, but any attempt to read data, like copying or looking that the file's properties results in a lockup on the client, and an eventual time out. On the server, a lock ( DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE ) is created an never goes away, even after the client as

I recently (a few weeks ago) installed 1.9.18p8 in order to get better performance with an Access Database, which along with adding a TCP_NODELAY in the [global] section has that working like a charm. Thing that's bugging me now is smbstatus. When I run it I see open files listed when I know that they aren't. The following output shows quite a few files open that aren't really. The

I help an NT admin that has recently added a redhat 8.0 based samba server to his network. the share is one that is a core service for the operation of the business and has about 50 users constantly accessing data from several accounting and tax preparation applications. One of the primary applications requires update farily recently as of late and the admin is having problems getting all files

We have a central samba file share for our designers (who all use OSX boxes, and mostly use Macromedia products) to work off of. I've lately been able to track down a lot of application quirks (mostly problems with errors when saving, about files being locked) to the Mac resource fork files being indefinitely locked. Here's a sample from a `smbstatus` 14853 DENY_NONE 0x1

Hi Volker and the list Yesterday the problem appeared again I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on and this is the result [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=35824, len=1} It seems the process was trying to get a read-lock but no one