similar to: [Samba-it] samba 4.x: centos 7: Bad SMB2 signature for message

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[Samba-it] samba 4.x: centos 7: Bad SMB2 signature for message"

2015 Oct 22
2
[Samba-it] samba 4.x: centos 7: Bad SMB2 signature for message
Il giorno ven, 25/09/2015 alle 11.39 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > Yesterday, after some day the problem It reappeared > > Now I try "server signing = mandatory", wait some day and let you > know. The problem still alive. Today Win8* cannot access to server, into log I see this message: > Oct 22 09:27:11 s-backup smbd[32645]: STATUS=daemon 'smbd' finished
2015 Oct 22
1
[Samba-it] samba 4.x: centos 7: Bad SMB2 signature for message
On 22/10/15 10:53, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > No didnt mis that. > When i see : >>>> realm = s-backup.studio.it >>>> server string = Samba Server Version %v >>>> security = DOMAIN > Then Im thinking this is a samba 3.6x connected to an AD, > but i can be wrong but NT4 does not use realm. > > ;-) > > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk
2015 Oct 22
0
[Samba-it] samba 4.x: centos 7: Bad SMB2 signature for message
No didnt mis that. When i see : > >> realm = s-backup.studio.it > >> server string = Samba Server Version %v > >> security = DOMAIN Then Im thinking this is a samba 3.6x connected to an AD, but i can be wrong but NT4 does not use realm. ;-) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
2015 Oct 22
0
[Samba-it] samba 4.x: centos 7: Bad SMB2 signature for message
On 22/10/15 10:03, Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno ven, 25/09/2015 alle 11.39 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > >> Yesterday, after some day the problem It reappeared >> >> Now I try "server signing = mandatory", wait some day and let you >> know. > The problem still alive. > > Today Win8* cannot access to server, into log I see this message: >
2017 Mar 07
2
Samba 4.4.4: ACLs not work property with recycle vfs object enable
Samba file server (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER) joined to Win2008 ADDC I have a strange problem with ACLs and "vfs object = recycle" enabled This is my share entry > [dati] >         comment = Cartella Dati x tutti >         path = /u/samba/dati/ >         read only = no > >         Veto files = /*.pst/*.ost/ > >         inherit acls = yes >
2016 Feb 05
3
Samba 4 Domain Members stop autenticate with Samba 3 PDC after seven (7) days
On a server Centos 7 with samba-4.2.3-11.el7_2.x86_64, joined to a server samba-3.6.23-24.el6_7.x86_64 PDC on Centos 6.7 up to date, after 7 days I want restart winbind service because the users are not autenticate anymore. This is the error into log file: > Feb  4 10:15:26 s-graph smbd[28960]: [2016/02/04 10:15:26.529467,  0] > ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) >
2017 Feb 15
3
Samba AD domain member with SSSD: ACL not work
Have you seen : ( centos/redhat ) https://outsideit.net/realmd-sssd-ad-authentication/ ( debian/ubuntu ) http://www.alandmoore.com/blog/2015/05/06/joining-debian-8-to-active-directory/ but i must say, i havent tested/tried these, i dont use sssd. But i think these are usefull for you to read at least. If you use the debian variant, you may need to install also : One or more of these :
2017 Feb 14
3
Samba AD domain member with SSSD: ACL not work
On a Centos 7 minimal fresh install and samba 4.4.4 I have follow this howto: http://www.hexblot.com/blog/centos-7-active-directory-and-samba and I have Joining to an Active Directory server and login to it with domain user without problem. My problem occur when I try from windows to modify some new rights (ACL's) to new folder on samba share. The folder is created correctly but if I add
2015 Oct 06
2
After update from 3.5.x to 3.6.23 all printers configured in CUPS they are no longer shared
After update my PDC server from Centos 5.5 to 5.11 and then samba 3.5 to 3.6.22 all work fine, except printers: all CUPS printers shared are not visible and usable from clients. If I put manually each printer (like suggest here[1]) into smb.conf, all printers manually added are visible and usable (this is my workaround for now). In smb.conf I have set: load printers = yes
2015 Oct 06
2
After update from 3.5.x to 3.6.23 all printers configured in CUPS they are no longer shared
Il giorno mar, 06/10/2015 alle 16.23 +0100, Rowland Penny ha scritto: > OK, from the smb.conf manpage: > > To use the CUPS printing interface set printcap name = cups. > This should be supplemented by an addtional setting printing = > cups in the [global] section. printcap name = cups will > use the "dummy" printcap created by CUPS, as specified in your > CUPS
2015 Oct 06
2
After update from 3.5.x to 3.6.23 all printers configured in CUPS they are no longer shared
Il giorno mar, 06/10/2015 alle 15.14 +0100, Rowland Penny ha scritto: > Would you care to share your very secret smb.conf file ? > > Rowland [global] workgroup = DOM netbios aliases = s-software, s-print server string = %L interfaces = lo, eth0 passdb backend = tdbsam:/etc/samba/account.tdb log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 smb ports = 139 unix extensions = No
2015 Oct 02
5
Samba 4 PDC and Windows Join
If I setup a samba 4 PDC (not AD) like I do with samba 3, I still have to change the follow registry key on Win 7/8/?/10 for join it to samba domain ? > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] > "DomainCompatibilityMode"=dword:00000001 > "DNSNameResolutionRequired"=dword:00000000 > >
2002 May 14
4
Redirect loc::80 to fw::3128 not work
The rule: ACCEPT loc $FW::3128 tcp www doesn''t work propertly, the http access does not redirect to squid but directly exit. what''s wrong? Thanks ------- Dario Lesca (d.lesca@ivrea.osra.it) -------------------------------------- @@@@@@@ this is my shorewall-1.2.13 config: #[/etc/shorewall/common.def]-----------------------------------------------
2017 Dec 04
4
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 14.48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > > The cure is to STOP your windows clients trying to update their own > records. Yes, this is true, on windows I will stop this service. But my problem now is another The samba command samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately not work It's possible to resolve this
2016 Apr 03
2
Centos7: Mount problem (Unit mnt-bk\x2dbenvet\x2d01.mount is bound to inactive unit dev-disk-by\x2dlabel-bk\x2dbenvet\x2d01.device. Stopping, too.
On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 01:58:42 +0200 Dario Lesca wrote: > Please, someone can help me to resolve this systemd issue? systemctl reset-failed -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
2015 Oct 02
5
Samba 4 PDC and Windows Join
As far as i know, as of samba 4, i dont do any registry changes anymore. And thinking.. even with samba 3 i did not set these on my win 7 systems. I still have few win 7 pc's connect to samba 3.6 PDC, without registry changes. But it all depends on correct dns / dns domainname /wins settings. ( for samba also, i always use "dns proxy = yes" ) If these arent correct, then the
2006 Jan 17
12
Multiple ISPs: How to force $FW traffic to a specific ISP (reprise)
Hi! I have reprise try to resolve this problem, suspended from 17 dec 2005 I have try to apply the suggest of Jerry (see above). The problem still exist. See attach shorewall config, dump and tcpdump when I check to exit whit SSH from firewall... In the masq file is reported the last my attempt in order to resolve my problem, however I have test also the example reported in MultiISP.html, but
2003 Jan 10
7
System Boot problem...
Hi, on a system RedHat 8.0, only on this, not on other various RedHat8.0, I have see the follow strange error in /var/log/{messages,boot.log} ..... After the boot all it seems to work, the modules is loads.... I have already tried to install other versions of kernel but the problem is always the same one :-(( Someone has some idea of what is happening? Thanks... Dario Lesca
2003 Jan 09
10
transparent proxy
I''ve installed a bering box acting as a firewall for a lan; the lan is 192.168.1.0/24 the bering box is 192.168.1.254 I''ve installed a squid server 192.168.1.1 It is possible to configure shorewall for a transparent proxy to the squid server? I''ve tryed with REDIRECT loc loc:192.168.1.1:3128 tcp www - !192.168.1.1 in the rules file I get this error: Error:
2002 Aug 06
8
converting MASQ from ipchains
Hello, on my old system I''m using ipchains. Can anyone help me with converting rule /sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s source_addr -d destination_addr 443 -p tcp to shorewall. I know that I can write eth0 source_addr to /etc/shorewall/masq file but I can''t found where I can specify the destination address. The reason for this is to allow one user (computer) access only to