similar to: Simple recipe for getting started with 4.2.0

On 03/30/2015 09:45 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:33 -0400, 02019 wrote: >> I bought and used Using Samba, 2ed, O'Reilly & Associates (Feb. 2003) to >> help me with this 12 years ago, but I think there may be >> interoperability problems between 4.2.0 and 2.2.5 because >> smbclientv4.2.0 -L hostname2.2.5 -N errors out with: > >

On 03/31/2015 8:55 AM, 02019 wrote: > On 03/30/2015 09:45 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:33 -0400, 02019 wrote: >>> I bought and used Using Samba, 2ed, O'Reilly & Associates (Feb. 2003) to >>> help me with this 12 years ago, but I think there may be >>> interoperability problems between 4.2.0 and 2.2.5 because >>>

On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:33 -0400, 02019 wrote: > I bought and used Using Samba, 2ed, O'Reilly & Associates (Feb. 2003) to > help me with this 12 years ago, but I think there may be > interoperability problems between 4.2.0 and 2.2.5 because > smbclientv4.2.0 -L hostname2.2.5 -N errors out with: For Samba4 the best - the very best - source of information is the Samba

Hi developers, I met some domU issues and the log suggests missing interrupt. Details from here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/263938#263938 In summary, this is the suspicious log: (XEN) vmsi.c:122:d32767 Unsupported delivery mode 3 I''ve checked the code in question and found that mode 3 is an ''reserved_1'' mode. I want to trace down the source of this

Hello, I noticed something that may or may not be a bug in Samba4 on an AD DC - I may be completely missing something and if that's the case please feel free to let me know - but. If for some reason the Samba4 DC thinks that the UID for an account (for example, DOM\Administrator) is 0, and you log into that account, it logs you into the local root account (even if it is disabled, as it

On 04/10/2018 05:22 AM, Han Han wrote: > Hi, > I tried to compile libvirt with address sanitizer( > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizer) to discover > memory errors. But fails when make. > Code version: > $ git describe > v4.2.0-92-g3f204e4de > > Compile tools: > automake 1:1.15.1-3 all [installed] > clang-7 1:7~svn323616-1 amd64

I have successfully built LLVM and LLVM-GCC4 on GCC-4.2.0-20070501 on Linux x86 32bit. GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is availiable from :- ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501 Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070505/5535bb23/attachment.html>

Hi all, (CC''ing dtrace-discuss as an FYI+workaround) I''m using dtrace -h to define provider probes for my application, and it wraps the resulting probe provider definitions in an #if _DTRACE_VERSION. Everything works fine for cc/CC, but gcc/g++ (gccfss v4.2.0) doesn''t seem to define it and the provider call macros expand to nothing instead. A diff shows that gcc uses

On Sat, 5 May 2007, Aaron Gray wrote: > I have successfully built LLVM and LLVM-GCC4 on GCC-4.2.0-20070501 on > Linux x86 32bit. > > GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is availiable from :- > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501 Great news! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Folks, A final RC has been tagged in the xen-4.2 branch: http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-4.2-testing.hg (tag ''4.2.0-rc5'') We plan to call the 4.2.0 release on Monday, with no further modifications. So please test this "GA preview"! -- Keir

Hi, We have a samba 4.2.2 setup compiled from source, single DC, internal DNS. We've been using this samba setup in production since version 4.0.3. All clients are Windows 7-x64. Since we upgraded to samba 4.2.0 back in march 2015, we are not able to join client machines to the domain using our sysprep unattended image, but joining machines via the manual procedure using the Windows GUI

Hello, I just grabbed http://bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/4.2.0-rc2/xen-4.2.0-rc2.tar.gz and tried to build it on Fedora 17 x86_64 host (gcc 4.7.0): make tools: .. make[5]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-4.2.0-rc2/tools/firmware'' make -C etherboot all make[6]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-4.2.0-rc2/tools/firmware/etherboot'' make -C ipxe/src bin/rtl8139.rom

Hello - I am a little problem trying to find what dependency I need to up date - This is what I see when trying to install: rpm -Fvh shorewall-* error: Failed dependencies: rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.2-1 is needed by shorewall-common-4.2.0-0Beta3.noarch rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.2-1 is needed by shorewall-perl-4.2.0-0Beta3.noarch I am using Centos 5.2 with the following RPM

Hi all. I'm trying to install Samba 4.2.0 on a Solaris 64 bit Unix server by doing the following but the configure script fails with "Couldn't determine size of 'bool'", any ideas ? :- # gunzip samba-latest.tar.gz # tar -xvf samba-latest.tar # cd samba-4.2.0 # ./configure ... ... Checking for blksize_t : ok Checking for blkcnt_t

For anyone considering using Samba 4.2.0, be aware that there is a problem with group write permission not being honored. This is seen on both Linux and Solaris. We have a setup where we have project directory trees where the files are owned by various users but also by a group that the various users are a member of. The group permissions are set to allow group write access. With Samba 4.1.* and

Hello, I am trying to upgrade our domain controller to 4.2.0 from 4.1.16, however samba will not start after the upgrade. It appears to be related to the fact that this AD domain was created by running classicupgrade. My test environment, which was originally provisioned from 4.0 does not have this problem. This server was originally deployed back in 2004 using Samba3 and OpenLDAP. We upgraded

Greetings, I am trying to get 4.2.0 Installed on a raspberry pi 2, I can build and install, but upon running samba -D I get the following: root at pdc1:/home/pi# samba -D samba: relocation error: samba: symbol lpcfg_lock_directory, version SAMBA_HOSTCONFIG_0.0.1 not defined in file libsamba-hostconfig.so.0 with link time reference I used the following to configure and build waf configure

I'm running latest CentOS 4.3 (2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp) and found that the included 'ntpd' 4.2.0a at 1.1190-r will not accept NTP broadcast packets. There is a documented bug in ntpd 4.2.0 to this effect, resolved way back in 2004: https://ntp.isc.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267 Any chance someone can include a more recent version of 'ntpd' in the next CentOS RPM update

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz.sig So, I'm back from the first vacation I've had in about 10 years. (Well, maybe there were a few short ones.) I was planning on coding it the whole time, but looks like I didn't manage to get anything at all done. Maybe that's a good vacation?.. Anyway, I've still a few

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz.sig So, I'm back from the first vacation I've had in about 10 years. (Well, maybe there were a few short ones.) I was planning on coding it the whole time, but looks like I didn't manage to get anything at all done. Maybe that's a good vacation?.. Anyway, I've still a few