similar to: Not using AD group when writing file

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Carl Carpenter <ccarpenter at hillcountry.org> wrote: > > On 16/12/14 20:47, Carl Carpenter wrote: > > On 16/12/14 17:35, Carl Carpenter wrote: > > Forgot to mention that the permissions are also incorrect. They are > supposed to be 775 but come out as 744. > > Carl Carpenter > Director, Information Services > Hill Country

Forgot to mention that the permissions are also incorrect. They are supposed to be 775 but come out as 744. Carl Carpenter Director, Information Services Hill Country MHDD Centers (830)258-5414 or ext. 2038 On 12/11/2014 4:13 PM, Carl Carpenter wrote: Per your request [global] workgroup = HCCMHMRC realm = HILLCOUNTRY.LOCAL server string = Samba Server Version %v

On 16/12/14 20:47, Carl Carpenter wrote: On 16/12/14 17:35, Carl Carpenter wrote: Forgot to mention that the permissions are also incorrect. They are supposed to be 775 but come out as 744. Carl Carpenter Director, Information Services Hill Country MHDD Centers (830)258-5414 or ext. 2038 On 12/11/2014 4:13 PM, Carl Carpenter wrote: Per your request [global] workgroup =

On 16/12/14 17:35, Carl Carpenter wrote: Forgot to mention that the permissions are also incorrect. They are supposed to be 775 but come out as 744. Carl Carpenter Director, Information Services Hill Country MHDD Centers (830)258-5414 or ext. 2038 On 12/11/2014 4:13 PM, Carl Carpenter wrote: Per your request [global] workgroup = HCCMHMRC realm = HILLCOUNTRY.LOCAL

On 16/12/14 17:35, Carl Carpenter wrote: Forgot to mention that the permissions are also incorrect. They are supposed to be 775 but come out as 744. Carl Carpenter Director, Information Services Hill Country MHDD Centers (830)258-5414 or ext. 2038 On 12/11/2014 4:13 PM, Carl Carpenter wrote: Per your request [global] workgroup = HCCMHMRC realm = HILLCOUNTRY.LOCAL

I am trying to run Samba 3.0.24-11.fc6 on Fedora Core 6. I've run across two problems that are keeping me from being successful. 1. IPTables. Even when I configure it through Webmin to not run at startup, it does anyway. I consider this a minor problem, at least for now, although I wouldn't mind some input on how to configure it to allow Samba. 2. Access to shares. We are running

Running FC6 and Samba 3.0.24-11.fc6. Workstation is XP Pro Initially, after disabling SELinux and turning off Iptables, I could access the shares that were set up. Came in this morning ready to start copying files and can't get in. Prompts me for a username and password which is rejected. I know it's not my workstation because I have another FC6/Samba server running and have no problem

I am having some trouble with installing R 1.1.1 When I run ./configure --PREFIX=/usr/local/R-1.1.1 --with-g77 I get the following error: checking whether g77 and gcc agree on int and double... configure: warning: g77 and gcc disagree on int and double configure: error: Maybe change CFLAGS or FFLAGS? I looked at all the docs/install/readme/faq files i could find and searched the list

Centos 7 Samba 4.1.1 Trying to get Samba configured correctly. Am using Active Directory for authentication and that seems to be working correctly. When creating a Share, Security and Access Control list the AD users and groups. If I take my name out of the AD group, can't access the share. Put my name in the group and I can access it. However, when I write a file to the folder, while it

On Saturday 20 July 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 19 July 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > debugfs_create_dir() returns ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) if debugfs is disabled. > > > Also my static checker doesn't like it when we print the error code, but > > > it's always just NULL. > >

On Saturday 20 July 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 19 July 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > debugfs_create_dir() returns ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) if debugfs is disabled. > > > Also my static checker doesn't like it when we print the error code, but > > > it's always just NULL. > >

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:12:31AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Mon) 22 Jul 2013 [23:41:00], Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > The PTR_ERR(NULL) here is not useful. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> > > > --- > > > v2: completely

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:12:31AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Mon) 22 Jul 2013 [23:41:00], Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > The PTR_ERR(NULL) here is not useful. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> > > > --- > > > v2: completely

On 20 March 2015 at 17:00, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 20/03/15 15:47, Timo Altun wrote: > >> I'm sorry it got confusing, changed the topic and I'll try to explain. I >> am using Jessie on the DC. Server13 is a linux file server and domain >> member, it is on squeeze. If possible, I do not want to upgrade it. The >>

On Friday 19 July 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > debugfs_create_dir() returns ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) if debugfs is disabled. > Also my static checker doesn't like it when we print the error code, but > it's always just NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> This looks wrong. debugfs_create_dir intentionally returns non-NULL so failing to create

On Friday 19 July 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > debugfs_create_dir() returns ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) if debugfs is disabled. > Also my static checker doesn't like it when we print the error code, but > it's always just NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> This looks wrong. debugfs_create_dir intentionally returns non-NULL so failing to create

Hi, I get build errors when trying to build a fresh r139985. Anyone got a clue? carl at carl:~/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm$ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) 4.5.2 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. carl at

Thank you for the answers Peter and Rowland and sorry to everybody for the spam...switched to another e-mail address and hope my messages will arrive only once from now on. As I wrote in my first mail, Kerberos does work. I can successfully request and list a ticket on the AC DC. kinit administrator at INTRANET.MAYWEG.NET Password for administrator at INTRANET.MAYWEG.NET: klist Ticket cache:

On (Mon) 22 Jul 2013 [23:41:00], Dan Carpenter wrote: > The PTR_ERR(NULL) here is not useful. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> > --- > v2: completely different > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > index 1b456fe..4cf46d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > +++

On (Mon) 22 Jul 2013 [23:41:00], Dan Carpenter wrote: > The PTR_ERR(NULL) here is not useful. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> > --- > v2: completely different > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > index 1b456fe..4cf46d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > +++