similar to: Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD

To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> 06.12.2014 21:47, Rowland Penny wrote: [] > Any chance we can see your smb.conf ? Sure, here it is. Somehow I forgot to add it initially, even if planned. Thank you for looking into this. /mjt [global] workgroup = TLS server string = %h samba server %v netbios name = FS netbios aliases = PALTUS LINUX SERVER acl allow execute

On 06/12/14 19:36, Michael Tokarev wrote: > To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > > 06.12.2014 21:47, Rowland Penny wrote: > [] >> Any chance we can see your smb.conf ? > Sure, here it is. Somehow I forgot to add it initially, even if planned. > Thank you for looking into this. > > /mjt > > [global] > workgroup = TLS > server

07.12.2014 11:00, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:17 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> Possible, domain name "TLS" is a NetBIOS-name of the domain. >> Verify that the name is correctly registered in WINS. [] >> Now I wonder if samba4 really supports classic NT4-style domains. > > It really is still expected to, and no intentional

On 06/12/14 18:17, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello. > > For may years we're running a classic (NT-style) domain with many > machines (mostly windows7 these days). Initially it was set up > using samba3, and now we upgraded samba to samba4 (4.1.11), without > introducing AD functionality (it is not needed). > > I especially asked in several places whenever samba4

On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:17 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello. > > For may years we're running a classic (NT-style) domain with many > machines (mostly windows7 these days). Initially it was set up > using samba3, and now we upgraded samba to samba4 (4.1.11), without > introducing AD functionality (it is not needed). > > I especially asked in several places

11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba: > Hi > > After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the

31.01.2023 08:55, Matt Savin via samba ?????: > In group policies use DNS aliases, then you'll need to change only DNS > entries for these aliases to point to a new host(s). I'd say don't use simple dns aliases (cnames) in a DC, but use SPNs instead (see samba-tool spn). This will manage CNAMEs too, and also manages the KRB tickets and proper autentication of the server to the

Hi! I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is in progress now). http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ JFYI. Thanks, /mjt

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:50:11 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > on the problematic DC "systemctl status" doesn't even show > "samba-ad-dc". > > Although: > > # systemctl status samba-ad-dc.service > ? samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: Samba daemons for the AD DC > Loaded: loaded

Hi, I'm trying to generate a multiple domain browselist but I don't get it to work. I've tried everyting by the book but the result is always the same: I can see the other workgroup(s) but they are empty. Currently I've added the following rules to the smb.conf remote browse sync = 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.4 remote announce = 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.4 As far as I understand

Hi, i'm using wine 1.1.21 playing BattleForge. Everything wok well excepted keyboard. I can't use any hotkeys. My keyboard seem not to work in game. Any idea?

07.06.2024 07:54, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> msdfs is broken in 4.19.? It worked fine in 4.18. This is not entirely true. >> Is no one using msdfs?? I wonder why I was the first to discover this? > > There must not be a test for your specific use-case. > > MSDFS is tested in the autobuild test suite. Can > you articulate the problem well enough we can > build a

Hello! I'm trying to remove a DC from our samba domain (samba 4.17.4). It was the primary controller (with FSMO roles), - I successfully transferred the roles to another DC. Now it's time to demote: ai# samba-tool domain demote -U mjt-adm Using svdcp.tls.msk.ru as partner server for the demotion Password for [TLS\mjt-adm]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server

16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated... Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29766 Summary: suspend-to-ram problem on GF7600 notebook Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> We had stand-alone anonymous samba server serving a read-only share >> as guest account. It worked well but had a few strange issues (like >> lots of noise in logs about bad smb2 signature).

05.04.2024 17:50, Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:24:33 +0300 > Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > >> 05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 >>> Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> We had

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:24:33 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 > > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> We had stand-alone anonymous samba server serving a read-only share > >> as

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 04:59:29PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >07.06.2024 16:57, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>It boils down to having wide links = yes (and wide links = no). > >It boils down to having wide links = yes (and UNIX EXTENSIONS = no) :) Wide links is problematic. I'd love to just remove it :-).

Hello, All! Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1.src.rpm with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc) Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups) Is using