similar to: Strange empty folders 1 1 1 1 1

So, along with the problem of lots of folders ending in 1 1 1 1, I'd like to have a strategy to delete these. I was trying to understand if it is possible to use http://linux.die.net/man/1/doveadm-expunge to delete empty folders, but without also deleting messages? Is this possible and if so what is the syntax? Kind regards, Samuel

On 21 Mar 2015, at 05:18, Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> wrote: > > So, along with the problem of lots of folders ending in 1 1 1 1, I'd like > to have a strategy to delete these. > > I was trying to understand if it is possible to use > http://linux.die.net/man/1/doveadm-expunge to delete empty folders, but > without also deleting messages? Is

Thanks Hardy. I have 1600 folders to delete.. in the end I did find -type d -name "* 1" -exec rm -r {} \; On 21 March 2015 at 21:22, Hardy Flor <HFlor at gmx.de> wrote: > With > doveadm mailbox status -u ... messages"*" > There is a list of folders and the number of messages and then with > doveadm mailbox delete -u ... "<name>" > to

Hi Hardy, I had over 1600 folders, writing manually doveadm mailbox delete would be a real pain. I guess I could script it but that's even more of a pain. It would be nice if there was a command to remove empty mailboxes or something similar. On 22 March 2015 at 07:50, Hardy Flor <HFlor at gmx.de> wrote: > Hello Samuel, > > with mdbox as Maildir no direct file operations

With doveadm mailbox status -u ... messages"*" There is a list of folders and the number of messages and then with doveadm mailbox delete -u ... "<name>" to delete. Am 20.03.2015 um 21:18 schrieb Samuel Williams: > So, along with the problem of lots of folders ending in 1 1 1 1, I'd like > to have a strategy to delete these. > > I was trying to understand

Hello Samuel, with mdbox as Maildir no direct file operations should beperforms. For empty mailboxes that will ever happen, the "doveadm mailbox delete" deletes the emails, if required in the mailbox. Hardy Am 21.03.2015 um 11:48 schrieb Samuel Williams: > Thanks Hardy. I have 1600 folders to delete.. in the end I did find -type d > -name "* 1" -exec rm -r {} \; >

Le 2015-04-01 01:16, Samuel Williams a ?crit?: > Hi Hardy, I had over 1600 folders, writing manually doveadm mailbox > delete > would be a real pain. I guess I could script it but that's even more of > a > pain. It would be nice if there was a command to remove empty mailboxes > or > something similar. Hi Samuel, you could do: find -type d -name "* 1"

On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Bertrand Caplet <bertrand.caplet at chunkz.net> wrote: > Le 2015-04-01 01:16, Samuel Williams a ?crit : >> Hi Hardy, I had over 1600 folders, writing manually doveadm mailbox delete >> would be a real pain. I guess I could script it but that's even more of a >> pain. It would be nice if there was a command to remove empty mailboxes or

Hi, I did this: $ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/llvm-2.8 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 .. $ make $ make install Still didn't install the headers. $ cd ~/llvm-2.8/include/ $ ls -la total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 samuel staff 68 1 Oct 12:47 . drwxr-xr-x 6 samuel staff 204 1 Oct 12:47 .. Libraries and binaries installed fine: $ cd ../lib/ $ ls -la total 44600

If that was a problem, wouldn't it affect the installation of every other type of file? Also, wouldn't that be a really strange bug? Anyway, I checked and the path was expanded, probably by the shell: -- Install configuration: "Release" -- Installing: /Users/samuel/llvm-2.8/lib/libLLVMSupport.a -- Installing: /Users/samuel/llvm-2.8/lib/libLLVMSystem.a -- Installing:

dovecot-1.2.9 I have a public folder using ACLs to determine who can access it. namespace public { separator = / prefix = shared/ location = maildir:/var/maildir/shared subscriptions = no } Outlook 2007 can't see any folders except at the top level. It can create them just fine, but can't see them after quit and restart. For example, I can create the folder shared/foo/bar but

Dear Sam, Thanks for your detailed response, however I am using the command line tool. The problem is that exactly the same arguments to CMake on Mac OS X and Linux give different results. On Mac OS X, headers are not installed. On Linux, they are installed. I've tested this on Debian Linux and OS X 10.6.4 both with CMake >= 2.8.0 I am not sure how to debug this problem. Does anyone

I recently looked into a problem that has been plaguing me since the switch to dovecot a couple of years back, documented here: http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/pipermail/procmail/2006-May/024363.html The gist is that when I tell Outlook 2000 to write all outgoing mail into a Sent-mail folder on the IMAP server (using mbox format), I find that the mbox's don't have empty lines separating the

Dear Oscar, Thanks for the clarification - thats what I expected, and that is how it works on my Linux computer. However, I am still having problems on Mac OS X with headers not being installed. Is the person who put together the CMake build files available to diagnose the problem? Maybe I should try it on another Mac... I only have one however. Kind regards, Samuel On 1/10/2010, at 3:02 PM,

Kevin, I agree with what you are saying on some level, but I don't think the code does what you think it does. rsync -e "foo\\ bar" will be executed by the shell and yield a cmd string in the do_cmd function of "foo\ bar". This will be split incorrectly into an argv of ["foo\", "bar"]. I'm not sure in what reality this makes any sense. All I'm

Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > The problem is that exactly the same arguments to CMake on Mac OS X > and Linux give different results. > > On Mac OS X, headers are not installed. On Linux, they are > installed. I've tested this on Debian Linux and OS X 10.6.4 both with > CMake >= 2.8.0 > > I am not sure how to debug this

Dear Óscar, If you review the install log I sent, you will see that the patterns still appear to work as expected. Despite that this may be a flaws in CMake, it may be prudent to see if it is possible to fix this for Mac OS X users? It may also affect other platforms? According to the documentation: The FILES_MATCHING option may be given before the first match option to disable installation of

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Samuel Williams < space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> wrote: > Rsync passed the backslashes through without dealing with them. > Yeah, it only does space-splitting and that's all it will ever do. It still looks to me like there is a bug in the original escaping, since any command receiving that string is receiving a backslash that is not supposed

Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > Could there be some additional option required for development files? > Currently, I have CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release - maybe this doesn't > install headers? `make install' installs everything, always, no options required.

Hi Samuel, I always just click the icon for CMake on the Mac. Then you select a destination directory for the headers from the graphical user interface and the source where the cmakefile.txt root is. Then you click on the configure button at the bottom. It will ask you if you want to make Unix Makefiles or XCode Projects or Eclipse Projects or a couple of other options. Pick the one you