similar to: PHP version not enough for developers

Yamaban wrote: >The mess we have now, is not the work of just one change. >What was the rationale to get udev into boot? -- Handling the ever >changing mess of plugable, switchable hardware. Not born and bred >for servers, but for mobiles (phones, tablets, laptops). >Who was the one that decided that "one-size-fits-all" and put that >into server environment? IMHO

On 10/24/2015 10:08 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > Was it? Many servers are deployed as standard images, both physical > and virtual, and having a single, standard, cloned image boot easily > on multiple types of hardware makes lots of sense in this > environment. Dbus is about hardware enumeration, both cold and hot > plug. And there are servers with hotplug PCIe, even hotplug

On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been >> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I >> must reboot my servers. I wondered whether this was simply a >> misconception on my part or an actual change in the environment.

I have tried many permutations of search terms in google and I haven't been able to find any confirmation that the megaraid* modules in centos4 supports port multipliers/multiplexers. Here is a link to the controller I have in mind at newegg: http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16816118032 In case anyone is interested, here is what my research has turned up when looking for

Does any one know how to, if at all possible currently, to export a block device via eSATA? i.e. how do I do something like iSCSI, but over eSATA? I have a cheat ($15 probably?) media player at home (Egreat EG-M31B Network Media Tank - awesome little machine) that runs some flavor of Debian and can be connected to any PC via eSATA as an external HDD's. i.e. it exports the built-in HDD as a

Hey, just bought an eSATA/USB dual drive docking station and my CentOS 5 can only see one drive at a time... Any one knows if there are specific parameters to set somewhere? Or do I need a more recent kernel (like upgrading to CentOS 6?) The docking is a Sharkoon Quickport Duo v2 + 2 drives + 1 eSATA cable... http://www.sharkoon.com/?q=en/content/sata-quickport-duo-v2 The eSATA controller is an

We've got this Dell server. In it, we've got two LSI HBAs. Mini-SAS to one RAID box. The other, cheapo RAID box, has eSATA. We got a mini-SAS-to-eSATA cable - actually, it's one mini-SAS to three eSATA. The systems sees not those disks. Will this just not work, with the HBA, or is there a driver that will let the what, mpt2SAS driver see the eSATA drives? mark

On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hi, > > So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 > however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP > people one month ago [1]. > > Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because they want to > use the latest version of Zend. They are proposing using this

Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST): > It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue > to be supported by Red Hat with security patches. Exactly. Nevertheless, PHP 5.6 is not "bleeding edge" as someone else said. 5.5 and 5.6 are really state of the art and often necessary to install certain software packages or for some functionality.

On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hi, > > So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 > however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP > people one month ago [1]. > > Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because they want to > use the latest version of Zend. They are proposing using this

El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribi?: > Kai, > > It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. > Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and long term support is absolutely crucial, software needs to run for years on end without glitches, without interruptions, in a very

James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally >> (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates >> - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around >> 2.6 kernel) . . . > > I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have

On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > But coming back to negative part (which is about almost any Linux > distribution). These often reboots started in my recollection around 2.6 > kernel which is long ago. There's no way that needing a reboot is related to 2.6. Indeed newer features like ksplice can /reduce/ the number of reboots required. jh

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> James B. Byrne wrote: >>> >>> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been >>> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I >>> must reboot my servers. I wondered whether this was simply a >>> misconception on my

On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark > specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7. For example, you could help out with Devuan, which aims to remove systemd from Debian, or you can switch to Slackware, one of the few major distros not to even include

On 10/24/2015 01:59 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sat, October 24, 2015 12:23 pm, Keith Keller wrote: >> On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>> For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark >>> specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7. >> >> For

On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: >> >> El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribi?: >>> Kai, >>> >>> It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's >>> not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. >>> Big corps, banks and the like have

El 22/10/2015 a las 12:48 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribi?: > > On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote: >> >> >> On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 >>> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the

On 10/22/2015 03:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El 22/10/2015 a las 03:00 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribi?: >> >> On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: >>>> >>>> El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribi?: >>>>> Kai, >>>>> >>>>> It is

On 10/26/2015 12:19 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> What FUD? It adds *binary* logfiles, readable only with a separate >>> program; when I restart a service, it does not *tell* me what's going >>> on, >>> just worked or didn't, so I don't