similar to: OT: bareos (F/OSS fork of bacula)

Hi, folks, I've got it set up, and it alleges that it's backing up Windows. However, when I try to run a restore for a Windows box, in bconsole, I say restore, then from most recent, then the client, and I want to select files. It builds its directory tree (it says), then tells me it's at c:/ (*Nix, not Win backslash)... and there's nothing there. The fileset stanza says to

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, November 24, 2015 12:38 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: <snip> >> I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The >> restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few >> files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my path first - I >> don't just see it with ls. Then,

On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, >> all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to >> install on Windoze",

IP wrote: > W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: >> On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>>> Trouble is, >>>> all I

Il 02/07/20 15:02, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: > > > On 7/2/20 3:22 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Il 01/07/20 17:13, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: >>> I realize this shouldn't happen, the file is a tgz and isn't being >>> modified while being transmitted.? This has happened maybe three >>> times this year and unfortunately I've just had to deal

Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't get much response. I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my path first - I don't just see it with ls. Then, when I do an ls, in

Hi all, I'm planning to use Bacula in production environment. I've seen the Bacula packages are not provided neither by any official repo nor any third popular repo (as rpmforge). ?Anyone use bacula in CentOS 5? -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up >> backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on >> Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it possible for >> the users to restore files from the server to their own machine? > >

After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say, arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with kerberos? I see that they have in alpha(?) tls support, which isn't a great idea, given the recent

Il 01/07/20 17:13, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: > I realize this shouldn't happen, the file is a tgz and isn't being modified while being transmitted. This has happened maybe three times this year and unfortunately I've just had to deal with it rather than invest the time to do the research. > > > Harriscomputer > > Leroy Tennison > Network Information/Cyber

I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to install on Windoze", and how to restore.... First question: how do you *see* a list of the files that have been backed up (you're not going to tell

m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been > looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd > like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found > yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online > storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm

I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as "no games".) Is there

On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been >> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd >> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found >> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back

Devin Reade wrote: > --On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 02:14:56 PM -0500 m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> 'Friad not. My users are saying they'd like the ability, from their >> Windows machines, to restore, without having to ask me to do something >> from the server. And they want to be able to chose the files to >> restore.... > > As Paul alludes, it's

On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're > supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows > binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly > of backuppc; comments on that,

My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? mark

> Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel <lists at eckel-edv.de>: > > Hi Alessandro, > >> Why many users skip bacula? It is powerfull and very stable. It is very difficult to setup but if you know how it works it is simple. IMHO - as Kern (Bacula lead developer) is pushing Bacula forward I dont understand this too. It must be a misinformation about the current

On Friday 31 August 2018 15:44:53 Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I would use FreeBSD (and I do use FreeBSD for bacula, now bareos backup > server and storage hosts), it has really small "footprint", and it is > quite widespread. > > Incidentally, I was using bacula for very long time, but recently I > switched to bacula's fork: bareos. You may want to consider the

On Tue, November 24, 2015 12:38 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't > get much response. > > I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The > restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few > files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my