Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build"
2019 Feb 11
2
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:35:56PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
> I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here:
> [1]https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64.rpm
> [2]https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el7.x86_64.rpm
> It works fine for me so far on el6, I'll update my pull request later on
2019 Feb 27
3
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:44 AM Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:49:30PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:35:56PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here:
> > > [1]
>
2019 Feb 11
0
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
Hello,
I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here:
https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64.rpm
https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el7.x86_64.rpm
It works fine for me so far on el6, I'll update my pull request later on
GitHub with this version.
[root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version
Linux version 4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64
2019 Feb 27
0
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:49:30PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:35:56PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here:
> > [1]https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >
2019 Mar 04
2
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard at citrix.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:12:40PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > I built 4.9.161, works for me on el6:
> >
> > [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version
> > Linux version 4.9.161-34.el6.x86_64 (mockbuild at build.aerisnetwork.net)
> (gcc
> > version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red
2019 Mar 24
2
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:00:00PM -0400, Karl Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson <[1]karljohnson.it at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Sure, I will update the PR in the next few days.
> Karl
>
> I've updated my PR and tested a build, it boots well:
> [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version
> Linux version
2019 Mar 23
2
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I updated my PR: [3]
> https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/xen-kernel/pull/18
> > > >
2018 Jan 23
2
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on
> this
> list,
> > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell?
> >
> > Call trace looks similar..
>
> Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into
>
2018 Jan 24
2
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net
> > <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this
2018 Jan 24
1
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of
> Johnny Hughes
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 6:39 AM
> To: centos-virt at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation)
> packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
>
> On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen
2019 Mar 04
0
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:12:40PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> I built 4.9.161, works for me on el6:
>
> [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version
> Linux version 4.9.161-34.el6.x86_64 (mockbuild at build.aerisnetwork.net) (gcc
> version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Feb 27 09:48:40
> EST 2019
>
> Only one strange thing, I had to run grub-install
2019 Mar 05
0
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Anthony PERARD
> <[1]anthony.perard at citrix.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:12:40PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > I built 4.9.161, works for me on el6:
> >
> > [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version
> > Linux
2018 Jan 23
2
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:35:24AM -0800, Nathan March wrote:
> > Thanks for the heads-up. It's been running through XenServer's tests
> > as well as the XenProject's "osstest" -- I haven't heard of any
> > additional issues, but I'll ask.
>
> Looks like I can reproduce this pretty easily, this happened upon ssh'ing
> into the
2017 Aug 30
3
Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
Hello everyone,
Recently Nathan March reported on centos-virt list he's getting frequent Linux kernel crashes with Linux 4.9 LTS kernel because of the missing patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty".
The patch was already merged upstream here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=71472fa9c52b1da27663c275d416d8654b905f05
but then
2019 Mar 26
0
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 01:12:53PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:00:00PM -0400, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson <[1]karljohnson.it at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sure, I will update the PR in the next few days.
> > Karl
> >
> > I've updated my
2019 Mar 23
0
CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
>> > > > >
2018 Jan 24
0
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net
> <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this
> list,
> > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell?
> >
>
2018 Jan 24
0
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote:
>> On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net
>>> <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> >
2018 Jan 23
0
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
Hi,
> Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this
list,
> and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell?
>
> Call trace looks similar..
Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into it.
Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just upgraded
this system to:
2017 Sep 20
2
Status of reverted Linux patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", Linux 4.9 kernel frequent crashes
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:49:13AM -0700, Nathan March wrote:
> > > I have no issues rolling this patch in , while we wait on upstream, if
> > > it makes our tree more stable.
> > >
> >
> > I think we should do that.. What do others think?
> >
>
> I've had the patch deployed to a group of 32 hosts (with hundreds of vms)
> for about 10