similar to: install_prereq install-unpackaged fails on Debian Buster

I've rummaged through the archives and documentation and have yet to find references to nbsd or mention of how to implement overhead paging using chan_oss as mentioned in the list previously. I suspect that one would use a soundcard in the PBX system and feed the output to speakers and/or PA system. Would someone please point me to some procedures or documentation to acomplish overhead paging?

Hi all! I am running SXCE 121 on a dual quad-core X2200M2 (64 bit of course). During an installation of a NetBSD 5.0.1 PVM domU, the entire machine crashed with a kernel panic. Here''s what I managed to salvage from the LOM console of the machine: Sep 2 18:55:19 glaurung genunix: /xpvd/xdb@41,51712 (xdb5) offline Sep 2 18:55:19 glaurung genunix: /xpvd/xdb@41,51728 (xdb6) offline

Hi there, Just wondering why my post was rejected? cheersRachel Subject: repeating autocovariate functions From: r-help-owner@r-project.org To: moyble@hotmail.com Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 02:56:27 +0100 Message rejected by filter rule match --Forwarded Message Attachment-- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:56:14 -0800 From: moyble@hotmail.com To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: repeating autocovariate

I am relatively new to R, and am having a problem with the following snippet of code, and I do not at all understand why it is behaving this way. I am running Windows XP, with R 2.12.1. I copy and paste these 4 lines into the R Console: t<-c("a","b","c") ans<-select.list(t) txtNBS<-winDialogString("NBS","300") choose.files() I

On 9/3/20 4:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously with GCC 10.2 this code produced: > > In function ‘nbdkit_strndup_intern’, > inlined from ‘nbdkit_strdup_intern’ at public.c:839:10: > public.c:827:10: error: ‘strndup’ specified bound 18446744073709551615 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] > 827 | copy = strndup (str,

Hi, I am trying to communicate H323 and SIP users. I have configured h323.conf, sip.conf and ooh323.conf. If I am using gatekeeper (gnugk) then I am able to call successfully to h323 users using SJphone. And same for SIP users also. But when I disabled gatekeeper and trying to call using gateway with sjphone then every time whatever number I dial the call goes to asterisk and some computerized

>>> Reviewboard is a legacy site and will likely be shutdown. Is there a reason you are wanting to visit it? After seeing Olivier's post about his recent failures on compile and it referencing NBS (Network Broadcast Sound), which I had never heard of, I was googling to find out more and that was one of the Google hits Doug

While trying to find a bug in my encoder, i came across an error in the spec where it defines the structure of the ident header... the spec defines 100 extra bits which aren't actually in the headers... NSBS, NMBS and NBS don't appear in a 3 2 0 header... the actual structure is as follows //0 - 7 header ident (8 bits) //8 - 55 theora ident (48 bits) //56 - 63 ver major (8

(adding virtualization mailing list) On Thursday 19 May 2011, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 5/19/2011 9:41 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> /proc/tile/hvconfig > >> Detailed configuration description of the hypervisor config > > I'm concerned about moving this one out of /proc, since it's just (copious) > free text. An "hvconfig" (hypervisor config)

(adding virtualization mailing list) On Thursday 19 May 2011, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 5/19/2011 9:41 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> /proc/tile/hvconfig > >> Detailed configuration description of the hypervisor config > > I'm concerned about moving this one out of /proc, since it's just (copious) > free text. An "hvconfig" (hypervisor config)

On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Victor Leschuk <vleschuk at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Hello David! > > I have recently started acquaintance with PGO in LLVM/clang and found > your e-mail thread: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099395.html . Here you > posted a nice list of optimizations that use profiling and of those > which could be using but

gcc 8 gripes (when using './configure --enable-gcc-warnings'): nbd.c: In function 'nbd_open': nbd.c:470:3: error: 'strncpy' specified bound 108 equals destination size [-Werror=stringop-truncation] strncpy (sock.sun_path, sockname, sizeof (sock.sun_path)); The warning is a false positive, given that we currently reject names >= sizeof(sock.sun_path), and thus we are

Hello David, thanks for detailed response! Do you have any tests that you use to measure the PGO effectiveness? I have tested clang version 6.0 with the same sample that Jie Chen used in 2016 and actually both frontend-based PGO and IR-based make code run slower, see the average time: clang++ -O3: 3.15 sec  clang++ -O3 and -fprofile-instr-use: 3.160 sec clang++ -O3 and -fprofile-use: 3.180 sec

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C00241.18831EF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Anyone ever tried to plot(c(1.0,0,2),c(1.0,0,2)); symbols(c(1.0),c(1.0),circles=(c(1.0)),inch=FALSE,add=TRUE); #? Why does the circle overshoot ? The problem is

Both Coverity and GCC with -Wstringop-overflow noticed that nvif_outp_acquire_dp() accidentally defined its second argument with 1 additional element: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c: In function 'nv50_pior_atomic_enable': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1813:17: error: 'nvif_outp_acquire_dp' accessing 16 bytes in a region of size 15 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]

David, could you please clarify on which code did you gain 10% improvement? I have run numerous tests with and w/o this option and it looks like it has no effect on performance (I am talking of the old 2016 sample to be concrete). Maybe we could investigate it together? Just tell me where to start? On 02/07/2018 02:11 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > Victor, thanks for the experiment. > >

I've looked through the lists and archives for overhead paging and I've seen responses to use nbsd or chan_oss. Does someone have a recipe to follow that shows how to implement overhead paging? best regards, erik

I obtain this message: Error: C stack usage is too close to the limit Marc Marí-Dell'Olmo CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Servei de Sistemes d'Informació Sanitària (SeSIS) Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona Pl. Lesseps 1. 08023 Barcelona Tel. 93 2027775 | Fax. 93 3686943 www.aspb.cat El 15 de marzo de 2012 13:35, Marc Marí Dell'Olmo <mmari@aspb.cat> escribió: >

Victor, thanks for the experiment. My suspicion is it is due to the remaining issues with block layout -- especially with loop rotation (with PGO). Another problem is that tail dup is not happening after loop rotation which can limit the effectiveness of loop rotation. I tried the internal option -mllvm -force-precise-rotation-cost and there is about 10% speedup with -fprofile-use. This option

Sorry! I've been pretty busy until now, this is: Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Let me know if you've pushed it already or if you want me to push it to drm- misc On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 12:15 -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Ping. I'll take this via my tree unless someone else wants to take it... > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 10:30:41AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: