similar to: Dropped call after 900s: 481 call/transaction does not exist and another anomaly during re-invite in timer - full anonymized trace attached

Hello! I'm facing ReInvites as caller from UAS despite configured session-timers=refuse (which can be seen in the SIP trace) always after 900s. (The behavior is the same if session-timers is set to accept). This just happens with one provider (German Telekom to callee at kabelbw). - The incoming ReInvite is answered immediately by asterisk (Status 100 / Status 200 - 0.02s). Media stream

I posted this over in asterisk-dev, realized I probably should have put it here. Hi there, We?ve been having a strange issue with a customer?s queues where a queued call will ring an available agent, agent answers, then a second or two later the agent is offered a second call which they cannot answer, since they?re already speaking with a client. This in turn causes a few issues: - Agent stats

Asterisk is sending a 481 in response to an INVITE for reasons I do not understand. Here is the INVITE: INVITE sip:8009499014 at X.YYY.32.3:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:X.YYY.32.10;lr=on;ftag=247898> To: <sip:8009499014 at X.YYY.32.10 :5060>;tag=ac86f72d2bfe10395b2e62e01c70bf66.0f65 From: "Scott Thompson" <sip:7166359474 at X.YYY.32.10>;tag=247898

Thanks. >From the document, the default looks 900s. And let's say tinc connected to A, B, C; What if the connection to A failed(To B and C are fine), and tried many times until the last try which wait the Max Timeout, then tinc will not try again to connect A, right?(And when the Max Timeout for connection to A will be reset?) Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>于2017年8月12日

Hi, Guus I noticed th default reconnect for the first time is 5s, if failed the timer will be increase, I would like to know if this timer can be adjusted? The Max Timeout you mentioned seems not exactly the one, from the description below, it looks to me it is the total time for connect to be re-established, if not it trying other tinc daemon? Different tinc deamons have nothing related to

Hello, I am moving from realtime chan_sip to pjsip and one of the problem I am facing is the lack of "sipregs". With chan_sip, when an extension registers, the server where it has registered to is stored in sipregs. Is there something similar in pjsip? How can I find on which server the pjsip extension has registered to? Leandro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Full_Name: Michael W. Grant Version: 1.7.1(2003-06-16) OS: Windows 98 Second Edition 4.10.2222 A Submission from: (NULL) (24.55.165.101) I just installed version 1.7.1 tonight. In the process I installed via CRAN from the menu several packages. One installation, exactRankTests, had a distinct anomaly. A DLL attempt to change FPU control word as seem in the last line of the following listing:

Hi Gabriel, ... > Summarizing, I have two questions: 1) is the CallGraph analysis "working as > intended" here?; and 2) what would be the correct approach > to modifying the proposed analysis in order to detect that randlc() is being > called in that CallInst ? the reason that the callgraph analysis does not try to understand indirect calls like this is that other passes

G'day, We are running Samba 2.04b on a Solaris 2.6 box as well as Samba 2.04b on a Solaris 7 box. In SWAT on the Solaris 7 box the nmbd service is seen to be running. On the Solaris 2.6 box SWAT says the nmbd service is not running. Doing a ps on the Solaris 2.6 box shows nmbd to be running. What is responsible for this anomaly? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Dave Lovett

Hi all Maybe someone knows a way to solve this anomaly in sample(): I like to compute a sample (n=100) with replications from a population of 2500 units but if I draw repeated samples from it I dont get what seems to be a representative sample if I look at other partitions of the population. Enclosed is the population g99 with 4 columns: (units, partition 1 (site), partition 2 (type), weights);

At the list archive page (http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/) there is an amazing message from the future: the year 2032 (q1). Not that I know anything about mailman, but someone might want to "maintain" that. -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

We are currently doing research and development on an open-source runtime application monitoring system for Asterisk. This system is aimed at detecting and mitigating problems or vulnerabilities that arise from residual errors--whether unintentional or malicious--either in the application code or in its configuration or usage patterns. It can, for example, be used to detect and prevent

I did all you posted scripts and it all worked out...Finally miracle happened. :D

This is probably a CUPS bug but maybe not, I'll mention it here just in case. When using cupsaddsmb to install 64bit drivers the drivers must be in the (maybe distro/configure dependent): /usr/share/cups/drivers/x64 to be sure that's "x64" with a lower case "x". The cupsaddsmb app ignores the drivers if the subdirectory is named with an uppercase "X" (X64).

When I run naiture in WINE (it is a Windows based program that I am trying to move to Linux/OpenSource) it says the FPS is like 500+ with just a block in the center. Yet the actual visual framerate is quite choppy: [Image: http://www.naiture.net/snap/wine1.png ] Here it is running in full, the reported FPS is more realistic: [Image: http://www.naiture.net/snap/wine2.png ] Why would the

HI all, I'm just testing out the capabilities of xapian and omega. Environment - Fedora15. Disk to be indexed - 2GB? - FAT16 filesystem. Named "New Volume" When I add a text file to the disk, by right-clicking in Fedora and choosing Create New - > Text File The system creates the text file as expected. I added some content/words, however, xapian-omega will not index it:

Hi, Can you try this command: virsh snapshot-delete serv1r2 snap --metadata On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Doug Hughes <doug.hughes@keystonenap.com> wrote: > I'm not sure how this snapshot got created, but, I cannot delete it, and > its presence prevents me from creating other snapshots. I don't know if it > was created by a command gone amok or something else. >

Hello everyone, we are running a CTDB cluster and share folders on ocfs2 volumes via samba using the vfs acl_xattr to store acls in extended attributes. It works fine with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I'm currently testing 18.04 and have a weird (but reproducable) ACL behaviour: I grant two users a and user b full access on a folder from a windows client. (Share permissions are fullcontrol for