similar to: Ast 13.10 to 13.11 stop working webrtc

Dne 11.8.2015 v 12:18 Joshua Colp napsal(a): > Vinicius Fontes wrote: >> I'm having the same issue! The difference in my case is Asterisk server >> has a public IPv4 and the browser is behind a single NAT. >> >> I'm forwarding my configuration below (which I posted previously on >> asterisk-users). >> >> How can we debug ICE negotiation? >

Hello I get the following error when using our Let's Encrypt ssl certificate for webRTC calls : [Jun 2 14:29:28] == DTLS ECDH initialized (secp256r1), faster PFS enabled [Jun 2 14:29:28] ERROR[27360][C-00000ae5]: res_rtp_asterisk.c:1441 ast_rtp_dtls_set_configuration: Specified certificate file '/etc/letsencrypt/live/ws.mydomain.tld/privkey.pem' for RTP instance

Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain

Hello I am trying to set up webRTC video calls from my Chrome webbrowser (Fedora) to my Chrome webbrowser (Windows 10). There is local video input (I can see myself), but never video on the receiving side. This is the case in both directions (so it makes no difference which peer is calling which peer). Both webRTC SIP peers have opus and H264 codec in their peer definition :   Video

Hi Is there known advices on how to favor PFS with dovecot? In Apache, I use the following directives, with cause all modern browsers to adopt 256 bit PFS ciphers, while keeping backward compatibility with older browsers and avoiding BEAST attack: SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 SSLHonorCipherOrder On SSLCipherSuite ECDHE at STRENGTH:ECDH at STRENGTH:DH at STRENGTH:HIGH:-SSLv3-SHA1:-TLSv10

with wireshark i need decrypt traffic every call which is time consuming. get debug from pjnat through asterisk is not possible because of technical reasons or nobody did it? in my case its strange that ice candidates are the same good call v=0 o=- 3669976329745317845 2 IN IP4 127.0.0.1 s=- t=0 0 a=msid-semantic: WMS EoNIdKcMZvWBLULGqGPJTDe12ujjFEemeapo m=audio 52421 RTP/SAVPF 8 0 101 c=IN

Hello, I have a problem with a call between 2 webrtc clients. Asterisk removes the ice-related lines from the sdp when it sends the INVITE out, and the called webrtc client rejects the INVITE due to the missing ice lines. Both webrtc clients are defined exactly the same way, same values in all fields except the number of the peer. There's probably something I've changed that causes this

Hi, I've got a problem that sounds a lot like this, http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Re-R-R-2-12-0-hangs-while-loading-RGtk2-on-FreeBSD-td3005929.html under windoze 7. but it seems to hang with this stack trace, #0? 0x77830190 in ntdll!LdrFindResource_U () ?? from /cygdrive/c/Windows/system32/ntdll.dll building goes as follows, $ ./R CMD INSTALL --no-test-load nlme_3.1-97.tar.gz *

Dear R-devel: The Cluster administrators at KU got enthusiastic about testing R-3.2.2 with Intel MKL when I asked for some BLAS integration. Below I forward a performance report, which is encouraging, and thought you would like to know the numbers. Appears to my untrained eye there are some extraordinary speedups on Cholesky decomposition, determinants, and matrix inversion. They had

Hi All, I have configured WebRTC according to the install document. The clients register correctly. I'm use SIPjs. The clients are able to send messages to the server. The SIP debug shows the messages being received. However I'm stumped for directions on how to route the messages between the clients. Asterisk 11.11.0 Here is my client sip config: [1060] type=friend username=1060 ; The

hi, i'm fighting with webrtc for 14 days reporting my experience to minimize number of crazy asterisk users i have working webrtc with simpl5 + asterisk 13 + pjproject 2.4.5 + chan_pjsip + secure websockets + secure audio + audio in both ways problems first, i needed run chan_sip for old hard phones and wss with chan_pjsip only for webrtc. this is possible with patch from

Sure did! I am even playing with different options (including NONE) and it seems to ignore the contents of ssl.conf I have tried Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:+TLS1.2:!TLS1.1:!TLS1.0:!ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA: Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=NORMAL:+TLS1.2:!TLS1.1:!TLS1.0:!ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Environment=G_TLS_GNUTLS_PRIORITY=PFS

I am using Asterisk 11.3.0 and just updated Nightly to 24.0a1 (2013-06017) and get a SIP 488 Not Acceptable Here response. I have no problems using the same Asterisk configuration and the same page to make a call from Chrome. I have seen other people post a similar issue, but I have not seen a solution. If someone with good knowledge of this issue were to respond with "this is a known

Hi List, I am trying to setup a Asterisk setup in AWS instance Centos6.5 . I have installed Asterisk 13.4 with srtp,pjproject. I have configured two numbers for webRTC clients, when i try to call from a client (sipml5) to another client (sipml5) it throws the following error: "chan_sip.c:5851 dialog_initialize_dtls_srtp: Attempted to set an invalid DTLS-SRTP configuration on RTP

Asterisk is on public IP (as described in the first email) i have 10 years experience in voip, 4 years webrtc in production. i know about ICE/STUN/DTLS-SRTP. yes, not every detail but the basic mechanism but i confess. i dont understand WHY Asterisk SOMETIMES switches destination IP in RTP. this is not only about ICE. its about RTP engine too which is Asterisk specific and Asterisk DEBUG is

I'm learning about WebRTC clients, and am wondering why Asterisk treats them differently from any other SIP client. The media (RTP) should be no different, so the only difference should be on the signaling side. I noticed that the Asterisk wiki mentions the need for res_pjsip_transport_websocket, so does that mean Asterisk requires the signaling to occur over a websocket? If I used

Dear all, I tried to do a backport of 'ssl_prefer_server_ciphers' (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/897484f45a87/) to Dovecot 2.1 (namely the Debian version of Dovecot) and wanted to ask if there is any chance to integrate this feature into Dovecot 2.1 'upstream' as well. As the code structure changed quite a bit, I am not sure if my patch is complete. I tested it with pop3s

hello, i'm facing strange problem asterisk13.5 + chan_sip wss transport + SIPML5 1.5.230 person1 to person3 are behind different NATs audio devices double checked call from person1(chrome) to person2(chrome) works call from person1(chrome) to person 3(chrome) - no audio on both side (RTP flowing only in one direction) call from person2(chrome) to person 3(chrome) - no audio on both side

Hello, I'm cross posting this from the OpenSwan mailing list, in case someone here can help. We have two sites connected via OpenSwan 2.6.32-9 on CentOS 5, sharing 6 /24 subnets each (so 12 in total). The problem we're having is completely randomly, be it in the middle of the day, or in the middle of the night (so I don't believe it's traffic related), certain (and sometimes

Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.29 on a freebsd 10.3 system. I'm wanting to optimize how the system is running and have a few misc questions. First ssl, is my cipher list good? I'm trying for pfs and wanting to ensure these cipherlist is appropriate: ssl_cipher_list = EECDH+AESGCM:EDH+AESGCM:AES256+EECDH:AES256+EDH Next, a new feature that I'm trying for is virtual folders that