similar to: Failsafe AGI using AEL

* The exit behavior of the AGI applications has changed. Previously, when a connection to an AGI server failed, the application would cause the channel to immediately stop dialplan execution and hangup. Now, the only time that the AGI applications will cause the channel to stop dialplan execution is when the channel itself requests hangup. The AGI applications now set an AGISTATUS

Hi, Using Asterisk 1.4.17. I'm calling a PHP script through AGI. No matter what my script returns (0 or -1), AGISTATUS always appears to be 0 = SUCCESS. I was wanting my script to be able to return a value to the dialplan and then test AGISTATUS but it looks like I'm going down the wrong path. Any suggestions? Thanks, Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

hi all, how to set the caller id facility for the TDM400p card. Please help me thanks, sandeep.s ----- Original Message ----- From: <asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:09 PM Subject: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 42, Issue 51 > Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users at

Good afternoon list. I'm trying to use ${AGISTATUS} after the execution of my script in PHP Agi. But after running the script, it just returns me 0 (true). Thus: -- <SIP/213-00000019>AGI Script check.agi completed, returning 0 I tried putting the lines "return false;" or "return 1;" but did not change anything. Does anyone have a clue? Thanks, Rodrigo Lang.

After testing some AGI's, I noticed several extra Asterisk processes. They are not zombies, but can't be killed by safe_asterisk. Nor will they die when CLI issues stop now. Then I read that each AGI spawns a separate Asterisk process. But all my AGI calls have apparently completed successfully. So there should be no reason for them to hang there. Several questions: 1) Under

I mean how do I set failure condition in AGI? My script exits with code 0 upon success, and non-zero when problems occur - the standard *nix way. But Asterisk always report "AGI Script completed, returning 0", and AGISTATUS is always SUCCESS. Yuan Liu

Hello. Happy New Year to everyone. I have a small WISP and would like to have customers to call our number to check their balance. I am planning on writing an AGI with php so it can get the customer info from the customer database. I don't know how to interact with the caller while in the agi script so this is what I have in mind: [test-agi] exten => 33,1,Answer() exten =>

Hi list. I have Asterisk installed on a Debian 1.8 6 64-bit. What happens is the following, some channels are not being hangup properly. They run the hangup in dialplan, but the output of the command "core show channels" shows several channels with status "rsrvd." Checking the server's memory, the "top" command shows multiple processes and stopped using the

Hi, We have a puppet 24.7 server for most of our legacy clients and a 25.4 server for newer ones and I notice that the :_timestamp format in the yaml has changed between the two. Old version: :_timestamp: 2010-05-18 10:10:57.751111 -07:00 New Version: :_timestamp: Tue May 18 09:34:59 -0700 2010 I probably wouldn''t have noticed the change if it weren''t for the fact that

I have a customer that described this issue to me in general terms. I''d like to know how to replicated it, and what the best practice is to a avoid the issue, or fix it in an accepted manner. If they kernel patch, and reboot they may get messages informing them that the pool version is down rev''d. If they act on the message and upgrade the pool version, then have to boot from

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

I have some clients that run centos6 and I need to have users be able to access the "failsafe terminal" from the login screen. The old options (from 4/5) for choosing your session aren't present. I've googled a bit on this but don't seem to be using a good search string as most of the hits have nothing to do with this and the rest aren't helpful. So, just wondering

Hello, I am going to be running an: rsync -av --delete $source user@host:$destination from one system to another. The problem is, $destination is a variable given by a script, and over time, many such rsync commands with many such variables will be run. I lay awake at night wondering what would happen if someone plugged in a broken $destination, and my nightly rsync proceeded to delete

Used to, when I had an error in development mode, I saw a pretty stack trace in the browser and didn''t have to go the server console, and in production mode I would see the pretty 500.html error page be displayed. Since I''ve started using Rails 2.2, I no longer get either of these. I get the ugly black and white "500 Internal Server Error" message. The happens the

I am trying to find out why form_tag with remote => true is not sending an ajax response and only sending HTML. I have started a basic Rails App with two pages and am following the Railscast 205 UJS example. Every time I include:- <%= form_tag homepages_path, :method => ''get'', remote => true do %> I get from the server(WEBrick):- (Ruby 1.9.2 and Rails 3) A 500

I'm admin on a samba PDC with 150 users, and as normal users they are quit "stupid". This means that they ofte deletes something that shouldnt have been deleted. And I find it anoying to restore their files from tapebackup. So would it be possible to get samba to "move" files instead of deleting them? This way I could allocate a disk to store deleted files for a periode of

I''ve just upgraded a production web site with some new code to handle file uploads, using both the standard post technique and swfupload. This code was working perfectly in my development environment, and I''m not sure what I should ever start to look for. Here''s the stack dump: /!\ FAILSAFE /!\ Wed Feb 06 19:13:41 -0700 2008 Status: 500 Internal Server Error