Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Is Asterisk a Linux only system?"
2015 Jan 14
3
Asterisk - WiMax Island Use
Hello All,
Please advise kindly about the following arrangement:
I need to have Asterisk working with company's mobiles via company's WiMax
mobile network. Both Asterisk and WiMax can work in an island mode (i.e. not
necessarily connected, even preferably not connected to any other
communication network like mobile operator, Intranet or Internet).
The result desired should be
2010 Mar 16
3
3.86-pre1 gpxelinux.0 SIS900 long boot time / fails to boot / no entries in tftp server log
Okay guys, This is separate from my last few messages. Along with those
attempts, I decided to migrate from pxelinux.0 to gpxelinux.0 in my
existing setup. Admittedly I haven't tried previous gpxelinux.0's but I
am willing to if someone thinks it would be useful. Everything works as
expected with pxelinux.0 of the same version.
With gpxelinux.0:
TFTP Prefix:
Trying to load:
1999 Jun 03
0
Security related bug/issue ... or mis-configuration? (fwd)
As a followup to my own email...
We did some testing here today with connecting to the share from an NT
box, where we connect to \\relay\marc as marc when log'd in as a seperate
user...NT refuses to allow it.
Is there a bug with the server that, using smbclient from Linux, allows
you to connect to any share without a password? Can someone test this and
see if its a local problem or not?
1999 Dec 13
3
Comments request to refute arguments about Samba...
I can't answer any of this, but the following was taken from a thread on
the "Novell Technology Transfer Partners List
<NOVTTP@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" and passed over to me by my boss...
Any comments/refutations/etc most definitely accepted...
Please note that *I'm* the Senior Unix Systems Administrator at the
University I work at, and have been moving us towards Samba since I
2015 Jan 14
0
Asterisk - WiMax Island Use
It can be done, contact me offlist to discuss further
Frank
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:32 PM, <j.halifax2 at seznam.cz> <j.halifax2 at seznam.cz> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Please advise kindly about the following arrangement:
>
> I need to have Asterisk working with company's mobiles via company's WiMax mobile network. Both Asterisk
2000 Feb 08
1
[2.0.7pre1] --with-utmp enabled ...
Under Solaris 7/sparc, I get:
Compiling smbd/connection.c
smbd/connection.c:381: conflicting types for `utmp_yield'
smbd/connection.c:30: previous declaration of `utmp_yield'
381 has 'int pid', while 30 has 'pid_t pid' ... I changed 381 to reflect
30 and she continues on its way ...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems
2004 Aug 06
0
Live from Mongolia
FYI... A recent article I wrote regarding my streaming adventures.
===================
Hoov's Musings
===================
volume 6, number 7
Source: http://www.acuitive.com/musings/
Live From Mongolia
Introduction from Mark Hoover
Acuitive people have all kinds of interesting hobbies, a few of which I can
actually talk about. In the case of Roy Harvey, his hobby is providing
live or
2000 Jan 26
2
[2.0.6] doesn't run under Solaris 7/sparc, Internal Error
Is the following a known problem:
===============================================================
[2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 22273 (2.0.6)
Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution
[2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43)
===============================================================
This is using the same
1999 Jun 03
0
800+ simultaneous connections ...
Does anyone have any experience with a high number of *simultaneous*
connections? We're investigating the possibility of moving one of our
servers from novell to solaris, and the only "concern" we have at this
time is what happens if 800 clients all decide to connect at the same
time?
the server will be running solaris/7 on a dual-ppro system ...
I konw with the 'idle'
1999 Apr 08
0
Letting users modify there own 'valid users = ' directive
Here's an odd question/request ...
Right now, if you setup smb.conf with a [homes] section, anyone can
connect and login to the server, as themselves, and mount their home
directory. No probs there.
Has anyone thought of, and possibly implemented, a means where that end
user could change things for themselves to extend permissions on their
directory?
Basically, make a Win based utility
1999 Jun 29
1
Linux vs NT: a new test
Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following:
http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html
One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite
would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the
problems revolve around Linux's IP stack...
Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set...
Marc G. Fournier
2000 May 27
0
guest only from Win2000 -> Samba 2.0.7 ...
morning all ...
I want to share a drive between two of my computers ... dont' want
to deal with smbpasswd, so am just doing it as an open share with a host
allow set to the computer that i want to share with ...
smb.conf is setup nice and simple:
[global]
workgroup = MYGROUP
server string = Samba Server
hosts allow = 10.27.227.73
log file = /var/log/log.%m
debug level = 3
2003 Aug 12
0
union_lookup panic ...
G'day ...
Altho it is rare, we are getting union_lookup panics on our server(s)
... as most on this list already know, we make heavy use of unionfs to
share between jails, and I already know that this is the "kernel side"
cause of the problem ... but ...
From what I can tell, though, the "trigger" for the panic is pkg_delete
... if I build a jail'd environment,
2004 Aug 06
0
ASSISTANCE
FROM: COL. KENNETH ABELANGE.
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO.
Tel No: Your country Intl. access code +873762692483
Fax No: your country Intl. Access code +873762692485
kennethabelange@africamail.com
Dear Sir/Madam
<p>SEEKING YOUR IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE.
Please permit me to make your acquaintance in so informal a manner. This
is necessitated by my urgent need to reach a
dependable and
2017 Nov 19
0
Call for papers - MICRADS 2018 - Salinas, Ecuador
* Proceedings by Springer and indexed by Scopus, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MICRADS?18 - The 2018 Multidisciplinary International Conference of Research Applied to Defense and Security
Salinas, Ecuador, 18 - 20 April 2018
2017 Nov 19
0
Call for papers - MICRADS 2018 - Salinas, Ecuador
* Proceedings by Springer and indexed by Scopus, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MICRADS?18 - The 2018 Multidisciplinary International Conference of Research Applied to Defense and Security
Salinas, Ecuador, 18 - 20 April 2018
2017 Dec 22
0
Call for papers - MICRADS 2018 - Salinas, Ecuador
* Proceedings by Springer and indexed by Scopus, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MICRADS?18 - The 2018 Multidisciplinary International Conference of Research Applied to Defense and Security
Salinas, Ecuador, 18 - 20 April 2018
2017 Dec 29
0
Call for papers - MICRADS 2018 - Salinas, Ecuador
* Proceedings by Springer and indexed by Scopus, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MICRADS?18 - The 2018 Multidisciplinary International Conference of Research Applied to Defense and Security
Salinas, Ecuador, 18 - 20 April 2018
1999 May 11
1
Security related bug/issue ... or mis-configuration?
Morning...
Attached are two files. The first (smb.session) shows one user
connecting to two different shares on a remote server using *no*
password...
The second is the smb.conf file found on that remote server,
running Solaris 2.6, and Samba 2.0.3 ...
I'm *really* hoping that its something that we're overlooking as
far as configuration is concerned...or else there is one helluva
2010 Jun 09
1
Problem Matching Exact Values
Sorry for the basic question - bur I ran into something I haven't
noticed before and would appreciate a little more perspective on my
problem.
I am using R to determine if various thresholds are hit (or surpassed)
in a data set.? If a threshold is surpassed, I have had no problems
identifying it.? However, when the threshold is matched *exactly*, not
all cases are being identified.
Please