similar to: PJSIP / T.38 - Asterisk not passing on v21 preamble and data

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "PJSIP / T.38 - Asterisk not passing on v21 preamble and data"

2015 Jan 06
0
PJSIP / T.38 - Asterisk not passing on v21 preamble and data
Hi, On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Recursive <lists at binarus.de> wrote: > 1) Did anybody test T.38 with SPANDSP? If yes, which version of SPANDSP did you use? Mine is 0.0.6 PRE 20. Should I try to upgrade to PRE 21? Or to one of the snapshots? I remember that I was having issues with an older libspandsp library. I simply upgraded to the latest available version which made the issue
2009 May 20
2
Problems receiving some faxes in T.38
Hello, We have been working with the ReceiveFax application for some weeks now in order to receive faxes in T.38 and it works fairly well, but there are some faxes that for some reason we are not able to receive correctly. The asterisk version we are using is 1.6.0.6 with spandsp-0.0.5pre4 and the asterisk machine is behind a CISCO mediaGW to be able to communicate with the PSTN. The SIP call
2016 Feb 17
2
Problem compiling res_fax_spandsp.c on Debian server.
On 2016-02-17 15:32, Richard Mudgett wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Ernie Dunbar <maillist at lightspeed.ca> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone. >> >> We have an Asterisk server running Debian Squeeze, with Asterisk >> v1.8.13.1 (basically, the Debian Stable version for Squeeze, but >> with some minor source code changes specific to our site).
2014 Oct 14
1
debugging T.38 issues
Hello list, We're currently facing some issues concerning T.38 gateway faxing. This is a device used almost exclusively for receiving faxes. Calls are incoming to asterisk on a SIP trunk (sangoma netborder) using G711A. Gateway mode is activated in the asterisk dialplan towards a Cisco SPA 112 running firmware 1.3.5. We are using asterisk 1.8.13.0 with the T.38 gateway patch applied (I know I
2012 Jan 05
1
Where are the fax instructions?
Hello, Trying to set up res_fax_spandsp. Based on https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/T.38+Fax+Gateway I wrote this in my extensions.conf: exten => 306,1,NoOp(Fax transmission) same => n,Set(FAXOPT(gateway)=yes) same => n,Dial(DAHDI/3) ----->FXS port to fax machine same => n,Hangup() Call flow Im trying to pull out is as follows: Zoiper -->
2012 Jul 23
2
T.38 Gateway
Hi everyone, we're trying to setup a fax gateway from PRI to SIP. Our test setup consists of two asterisk 10 machines connected over PRI and a third one which is acting as a fax endpoint over SIP. On the machine which is receiving over PRI, we see the following message: [Jul 23 12:54:23] DEBUG[18288] res_fax.c: detected v21 preamble on SIP/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx-00000001, but DAHDI/i1/-2 does not
2009 Feb 26
1
Can't build today's AGX Asterisk Addon with spandsp0.0.6pre3 or 4
Hi, With 0.0.6pre3: # ./build.sh CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt: No cmake_minimum_required command is present. A line of code such as cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6) should be added at the top of the file. The version specified may be lower if you wish to support older CMake versions for this project. For more information run "cmake --help-policy CMP0000".
2004 May 25
4
fax/sandsp segfaulting asterisk
Like some others on the list spandsp is segfaulting asterisk when recieving a fax. I'm on debian testing/unstable with freshly checked out asterisk CVS and sandsp. My libtiff version is 3.6.1. Here is the GDB output --- snip ----- Changed from phase 5 to 4 Start rx document - compression 2 Start rx page >>> CFR: 84 HDLC underflow in state 5 Post trainability Changed from phase
2004 Sep 20
4
spandsp / compilation errors
I am attempting installation of spandsp on to an Asterisk installation on Linux RH9 the distribution i am using is that are URL http://ftp2.tootai.net - the README for which i have followed verbatim - my only issue on this was the target for the port.h / tif_dir.h / tiffiop.h files in the 'headers' folder of the distribtion i put these in the /usr/include folder based simply on the
2004 Aug 18
27
SpanDSP
Anyone knows where can I find spandsp? Official site seems permanently down... TIA, Simone.
2005 Aug 07
1
request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty
The bounty stands at $5,500. I'm seriously considering taking a shot at it if I can find a decent T.38 provider to test with (I'm still hoping for reliable PAYG T.38). It looks like a lot of very smart people have done a lot of very hard work (t38modem, spandsp) that would go towards getting this working. At this point it appears to be mostly a matter of integration
2004 May 25
10
spandsp hylafax asterisk and confusion
I have been attempting to download, compile and configure spandsp to function with * without much luck. I am guessing that some assumptions were made regarding the users knowledge level of Linux. Sadly, I must not live up to those assumptions. My problem begins when after compiling spandsp I look for the app_rxfax.c, app_txfax.c, app_dtmftotext.c and makefile.patch files to place in the
2006 Jan 12
6
app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so
Hi, I just installed spandsp 0.0.3pre6 with libtiff 3.7.1 and evrythinghs is ok. I recompiled asterisk and run ldocnfig, but whrn I start asterisk I get this error: [app_rxfax.so]Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:258 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: undefined symbol: fax_set_phase_d_handler Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:440 load_modules: Loading
2004 Dec 02
1
SpanDSP 0.0.2pre6 undef symbol on gentoo-ppc
Hello all: In a quest to resolve the last apparent timing problems I am having with SpanDSP I am trying out some PPC hardware, specifically a B&W G3. I am running gentoo-ppc on this system and have compiled spandsp 0.0.2pre6 along with a release version of asterisk. Zaptel device (T100P) is configured and appears to be ready to go. When loading asterisk it crashes out with the following
2006 Jan 12
1
R: app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so
I have to re-compile also app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so or just spandsp ? Thanks Giordano ________________________________ Da: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Per conto di Colin Anderson Inviato: gioved? 12 gennaio 2006 17.20 A: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
2006 Jan 03
4
Problems Upgrading to 1.2.1 on Fedora 3
I am having trouble with FC3. After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile 1.2.1 from source: make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: `libdb1.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast'
2005 Jun 03
1
Problem starting RX_FAX and TX_FAX Module
Hello all, After compiling successfully Asterisk and AMPortal, I cannot make the fax module work. Asterisk does not start (unless I remove the modules or mark them as Noload in modules.conf) with the following error: Jun 3 20:55:25 VERBOSE[3328]: [app_rxfax.so]Jun 3 20:55:25 WARNING[3328]: /usr/local/lib/libspandsp.so.0: undefined symbol: dds_modf Jun 3 20:55:25 WARNING[3328]: Loading
2008 Sep 08
1
Help about the Rxfax on asterisk
Hi all, I have a trixbox2.6.1 on my one server, i have configured sangoma A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card on that server, from my zap line the incoming faxes are coming, i have setup the did for zap channel. my question is when i am getting any faxes, asterisk shows me rxfax execution and suddently asterisk crashes and i can't get email notification for received faxes. any one help me
2004 May 28
2
spandsp wont compile.
I can't get spandsp to compile. when I go to the */apps directory i continually fails. Makefile:80: warning: overriding commands for target `app_rxfax.so' Makefile:77: warning: ignoring old commands for target `app_rxfax.so' cc -fPIC -c -o app_rxfax.o app_rxfax.c app_rxfax.c:45: error: `PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP' undeclared here (not in a function) make: ***
2014 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] Loop vectorizer preamble
Hi Arnold, Nadav, I've been taking a look at the preamble and bailout tests created by the loop vectorizer, and I can't help but feel it could be rather conservative. I'm not a vectorization expert, so I apologise in advance if say something obviously wrong... I'm looking in particular at the overflow check and the trip count computation. From my reading, it goes something like: