similar to: [LLVMdev] I am suspicious on the setting of _WIN32_WINNT

The Wine development release 1.7.50 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - New version of the Gecko engine based on Firefox 40. - First steps of the Direct3D 11 implementation. - Better font matching in DirectWrite. - Support for OpenMP on ARM platforms. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

The Wine development release 1.1.10 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Support for virtual memory write watches. - Workarounds for the WINAPI compiler bug on Mac OS. - Several fixes for the 64-bit build. - Some more GdiPlus functions. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

Support Requests item #4264, was opened at 2006-04-26 15:07 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=412&aid=4264&group_id=85 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: win32 process Initial Comment: I try to use the fork example, but I

Hi All, I 'm trying to build Omega 1.2.9, configure ran through, but when I do make I get error below. Any thoughts what I am missing? Thanks Noel make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/xapian/xapian-omega-1.2.9' Making all in . make[2]: Entering directory `/xapian/xapian-omega-1.2.9' /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./commo n

I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages either in a headless console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but ESXi in ages except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the guests which I will need to run will be wnidows based and last I looked at this a few years ago, windows guests ran pathetic. What are some more current

I know pc-lint is working fine on detecting some nasty coding fault. But is it illegal implement it in clang? And also there is so much other tools for code analyze:) 2010/3/26, yiqiuping1986 <yiqiuping1986 at 126.com>: > 呵呵，不急，还有一学期的时间。 > > > 2010-03-26 > > > > yiqiuping1986 > > > > 发件人： 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) > 发送时间： 2010-03-26 15:05:33 > 收件人：

For example, ELF.h MachO.h and COFF.h should moved into Object directory with new name. and Dwarf.h should moved into DebugInfo directory. 2013/6/29 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>: > Where would you like to move them? > > -eric > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:38 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) > <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: >> From my point of view, the

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:29:26PM +0000, richard wrote: > * common/utils.c,common/utils.h: For windows, add an om_tostring()function for > 64 bit integers: time() and GetProcessId() return these, and without this, > backends/quartz/quartz_log.cc reports an error. This change generates a new warning in the mingw cross-build: common/utils.cc:82: warning: int format, different type

Hi, I intend to participate in Google's Summer of Code this year, so I'd like to bounce another idea around to see what you guys think. (I posted a similar message to cfe-dev just now.) Be warned: this will shock you. It may even horrify you. 1. Implement a 16-bit x86 backend. (*Chris recoils in horror*) Yeah, I know 16-bit x86 is dead, but I find it interesting for historical purposes

Going to be interesting layering issues if you do the latter. Then you have CodeGen depending upon DebugInfo instead of just a header in Support. -eric On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:08 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > For example, > ELF.h MachO.h and COFF.h > should moved into Object directory with new name. > and Dwarf.h should moved into DebugInfo

Well, is that possible to include libstdc++4.7 into llvm? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer > gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release > binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for >

>From my point of view, the Support library should be more pure. And should not contains too much LLVM-related APIs and defines, -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo

It is possible to statically link against libstdc++, yes. I don't quite know all the pieces to the recipe in order to get that to work. It would require changes to the release script in order to get those configuration changes all the way through the third phase build. I don't believe any other tarball release does this, so it would at least be an unconventional release. On Wed, Jun

I means visual studio c++ 2008, do you build clang+llvm with .sln files, and these files are generated by cmake? I do of that. And because vs c++ can't recognize path such a:/filepath/.. Properlyn it's recognized as a:/filepath So we need change /.. to /../ or /../. 2009/8/6, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>: > I don't understand this problem, I have built clang on

2013/10/19 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>: > On 19 October 2013 06:01, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: >> I found that access llvm-mc from clang driver is impossible, and I >> want to use llvm-mc to compile assembly files, how to do that? > > Try "clang -integrated-as -c test.s" Thank you very much, I use the

-- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161115/80fd3c17/attachment.html>

When compiling the following line of code using WineLib 20010731 you get a warning message. // generates a warning CompareString(LOCALE_USER_DEFAULT, dwFlags, s1, -1, s2, -1); These warning relates to the defines found in include/winbase.h file where we have: UINT WINAPI CompareStringA(DWORD,DWORD,LPCSTR,DWORD,LPCSTR,DWORD); UINT WINAPI

Hell, Brian, I found a way to install Gcc 5.3 on CentOS 6 without the need to building it from source. You may try it on CentOS 6.0 That's makes clang/llvm won't depends on the newer version of glibc 2.14 The instruction: vim /etc/yum.repos.d/llvm.repo The content: ``` [sclo] name=SCLO baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/x86_64/rh/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 ``` Installation step:

So CentOS before 6.7 is not an option after all? Is that possible to use clang on CentOS 6.6 and before? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7. I wanted to build it > against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer > libstdc++. > > Sorry, it would be clearer

[root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin [root at localhost bin]# ./clang ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found (required by ./clang) ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: