similar to: HA configuration in glusterFs with storhaug

Thanks Kaleb, I presumed as much. I did previously try with 3.10 but ended up running into issues with pacemaker. I guess same question applied, can you point to any guides to a full setup of Ganesha on 3.10? Thanks From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> To: Jonathan Archer <jf_archer at yahoo.com>; "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at

Yeah I saw that, which is what brought me to the mailing list. Ta From: Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> To: Jonathan Archer <jf_archer at yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017, 14:04 Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ganesha or Storhaug Not according to storehaug's GitHub page: > Currently this is a WIP content dump. If you want to get this up and running,

All, I am upgrading the storage cluster from 3.8 to 3.10 or 3.12. I have 3.12 on the ovirt cluster. I would like to change the client connection method to NFS/NFS-Ganesha as the FUSE method causes some issues with heavy python users (mmap errors on file open for write). I see that nfs-ganesha was dropped after 3.10 yet there is an updated version in the 3.12 repo for CentOS 7 (which I am

On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug > configuration' off google.? Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't > help alot: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ > >

On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: > + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists > about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. If you need HA,

On 11/21/2017 08:59 AM, Jonathan Archer wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just installed gluster 3.12 to build a test NFS storage cluster and > noticed that ganesha seems to have been consumed into storhaug. > > Is there any documentation or guides around for storhaug? > No, not yet. If you want HA clustered ganesha with glusterfs your best bet for now is to use

I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or just post them on mail list? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used

Hey Guy's, A success story instead of a question. With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.

On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug configuration' off google. Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't help alot: https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html Hence the ask here. storhaug feels like it's not moving

On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: + gluster users as well. Just read another post on the mailing lists about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS Ganesha then? Cheers, Tom > Hey All, > > I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each > node.? ATM the

Hi all, I've just installed gluster 3.12 to build a test NFS storage cluster and noticed that ganesha seems to have been consumed into storhaug. Is there any documentation or guides around for storhaug? Thanks Jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 2/19/2018 12:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Sounds good and no problem at all. Will look out for this update in the future. In the meantime, three's a few things I'll try including your suggestion. Was looking for a sense of direction with the projects and now you've given that. Ty. Appreciated! Cheers, Tom > On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 2/19/2018

Hello. After working with the 3.12 flavor of gluster I learned nfs-ganesha was replaced with storhaug in 3.11.Have people been successfully utilizing storhaug and does any documentation exist for using it in a ha nfs configuration or is ha in gluster so rarely used it's a non-issue for most gluster users? Going through the lists, it was recommended in November to not use storhaug and if

Thanks Kaleb, indeed, starting ganesha without HA works, but it's certainly not desirable, and everything is back to manual operations like in the old days. Do you have any time estimate for storhaug to be ready? Maybe it's worth to mention this in the documentation of 3.12 as well, otherwise other people will have the same problems. Cheers, ??? Alessandro Il 12/09/17 14:48,

On 09/12/2017 08:20 AM, Alessandro De Salvo wrote: > Hi, > I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view. > The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO

On 20/12/2017 16:51, Craig Lesle wrote: > With the release of 3.12 ltm and now 3.13 stm, when 4.0 is > released 3.10 is shown to be at eol; > > Version Status ???? Release_Date? EOL_Version EOL_Date > 3.10 ?? LTM ??? ??? 2017-02-27 ?? 4.0 ??? > 3.11 ?? EOL ??? ??? 2017-05-30 ?? 3.12 ??? ?? 2017-8-30 > 3.12 ?? LTM ??? ??? 2017-08-30??? 4.3 ??? > 3.13 ?? STM ??? ???

Hi, I'm planning to upgrade to gluster 3.12, so I tried on a dev cluster the new release, but I was surprised the Ganesha support is someway incomplete, at least from the documentation point of view. The installation of glusterfs was successful, and it also works with my ovirt facility. However I cannot easily upload to the ISO domain without the nfs support. It seems that in 3.12 (and

Hi, Also I forgot to mention there are DUMP and PORTBYBRICK calls too. I understood these too calls are to get updated on gluster configuration. But all these two calls are to a particular node only while there are total (2+1)*3= 6 nodes in my configuration. Why so? What exactly is DUMP and PORTBYBRICK? Regards Jeevan. On Dec 10, 2017 6:47 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at

Filtering the brick logs in TRACE mode with rpcsvc.c does show the FOPS. >From this, I've realized that LOOKUP is actually dns lookup. This actually differs from NFS lookup operation. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 13, 2017 9:40 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get a brief description of all the

Hi, What I meant was that every host acts as nfs server for itself alone. A is mounted on A, B is mounted on B etc. So, if a host is crashed or storage of the host is not available, other hosts won't be affected. And how bad can be the performance overhead in having multiple nfs servers? Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 15, 2017 10:07 AM, "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com>