similar to: Question about adding DNS records

Hello, I am trying to change over from bind9 to internal dns. For some reason I keep getting the following error: Error parsing DNS data from '/opt/samba/private/dns/TH01.INET.zone' () I have inspected TH01.INET.ZONE but I could not find an error. I do not understand this error message. I am hoping someone could help me with this issue please. Your help will be very much appreciated.

Hello, First of all I would like to thank the Samba Project Group for this state of the art software. I would like to thank every body for helping each other out. Please ignore my poor English writing. It is not my native language. Although: I do the best I can. We use Samba for a while now. We started with version 4.0.6 and updated each time. Now we are at version 4.0.9 and we are planning to

Hi all, I got some issues with adding DNS records. I still use BIND9_FLATFILE on my first DC. Maybe this is the problem? What I would like to try is to change from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ. I change the backend from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ twice (in the past or other servers) but I don't remember how I did this anymore! What I did try is the following... and that didn't work. I

Hi Samba List! We are using Samba Version 4.1.12 on two master DC. We've noticed that a corrupted group has been created, we tried to delete it, and since then, the replication fail between the two DC. The result of the command : "samba-tool drs showrepl" is the following : On the first DC, INBOUND NEIGHBORS : Last attempt @ Wed Feb 4 11:26:41 2015 CET failed, result 58

​Hello Andrew, Thank you for your reply (very much appreciated). > I take it you are trying to move from the flatfile based bind to internal. That is correct > The samba_upgradedns script is pretty simple, and uses the > dnspython library to read zone files. It certainly could be > the case that it just can't read the zone file after bind9 > has been doing dynamic updates

Hello Rowland, [Quote Bouke Henstra] I am trying to change over from bind9 to internal dns. For some reason I keep getting the following error: Error parsing DNS data from '/opt/samba/private/dns/TH01.INET.zone' () [..] [Quote Rowland Penny Are you using flat files with Samba and Bind ?? If so, what you are trying to do, will not work. Rowland [..] Thank you very much for your reply. I

G'day All, Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all together. On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >> Thanks Carlos, >> >> The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is >> the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only >> updated the OS.

On 24/03/18 01:35, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: >> G'day All, >> >>     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all >> together. >> >> On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >>> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >>>> Thanks Carlos, >>>>

Dear all, I have a few question regarding to DNS and upgrading from Samba 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. After reading about the Badlock Bug, I feel the urge to upgrade my Samba installation and to move from BIND9_FLATFILE to SAMBA_INTERNAL_DNS. I am using Samba version 4.1.17. During provisioning (some years ago) I have decided to use BIND9_FLATFILE. At this moment I would like to upgrade to Samba 4.4.2 and

Hello! I have 2 Samba 4 server (4.3.3) as VC and other Samba 4 (4.3) as Fileserver, until now all ok, but I'm one doubts, how to validate that in both servers the domain IDs of the users of this identical, a simple way to do this validation? I wanted to make sure it is a DC die fileserver has to go 100%. thank you

What I have done bevor updating to 4.3.4 and it was working until then. I userd the map unix tab in ADUC and gave uid and gid to all users /groups but administrator. This worked until the update. Now the dcs mix up only!!! group ids with computer ids (security tab) root at s4slave exim]# getent group personal TPLK\personal:x:3000044: root at s4slave exim]# getent group reserve09$

Hello all, we are currently running several samba 3 services to give CIFS access to shares (mostly homedirs). Well, access to the shares are controlled by our LDAP service (not AD, OpenLDAP). Our servers are using sssd + pam to check wether or not a user is allowed to mount the share (on some old servers we also use the pam_ldap module for pam). Now, we just want to run samba 4 as simply as

Hello again, no idea!? Both my DCs running now 4.3.4, but there is a strange behaviour, Ex.: First DC root at s4master wingroup]# id maurerp uid=90036(TPLK\maurerp) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000048(TPLK\schreiben),3000038(TPLK\orbis),3000023(TPLK\ agfa),3000009(BUILTIN\users) Second DC [root at s4slave ~]# id maurerp uid=90036(TPLK\maurerp) gid=100(users)

Dear all, Running samba-tool ldapcmp on my both DCs samba 4.1.7 leads to the output : Attributes found only in ldap://s4master: msDS-NcType serverState FAILED How to deal with this? I am missing something? [root at s4slave ~]# samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://s4master ldap://s4slave -Uadministrator domain Password for [TPLK\administrator]: * Comparing [DOMAIN]

On my site with samba 4.18 on centos 6: 'samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://DC1 ldap://DC2 -Uadministrator' failed with this result msDS-NC Type failed : [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://s4master ldap://s4slave -Uadministrator Password for [TPLK\administrator]: * Comparing [DOMAIN] context... * Objects to be compared: 606 Comparing: 'CN=Builtin,DC=tplk,DC=loc'

Le 09/07/2015 18:20, Rowland Penny a écrit : > On 09/07/15 17:06, zorg wrote: >> But If i want my samba4 to be dns after when i ll decide to stop the >> other dc >> >> can't i keep the to dns >> >> Could you explain a bit >> >> >> >> Le 09/07/2015 17:55, Marc Muehlfeld a écrit : >>> Hello, >>> >>> Am

Hai Rowland. What you tried is ok, or im misunderstanding you. For me : All members give me. getent passwd myuser myuser:*:10002:10000::/home/users/myuser:/bin/bash id myuser uid=10002(myuser) gid=10000(domain users) the memberservers are or sernet samba 4.2.7 or debian samba 4.1.17 and on the DCs. ( only sernet samba 4.2.7 ) getent passwd myuser myuser:*:10002:10000:L.P.H. van

Hi all, I'm having a test AD domain composed with 2 DC, using Sernet's version of Samba 4.2.2. These two DC are Centos 6.6 (dc20) and Debian 7.8 (dc00). These two are using TDB as a backend (as we have no other choice at this stage of Samba's development). *dc20*:~# ldbsearch -H $sam '(objectclass=group)' dn | tail -3 # returned 27392 records # *27389* entries # 3 referrals

Hai,   I just noticed something strange with my group GID assignments.   This happens on my  DC.   I have my “Domain Admins”  “Domain Users” etc given a GID. (im using  ad backend )   Running getent group "domain admins" gives back.   domain admins:x:3000008:administrator,admin   But this is fault..  that GID should be 10001   Anyone noticed this also ?   After

Here I obtained: --------------------- * Comparing [DOMAIN] context... Failed search of base=DC=ad,DC=domain,DC=tld ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - LDAP client internal error: NT_STATUS_UNEXPECTED_NETWORK_ERROR File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File