similar to: lost packets - Bond

Hi all, I just noticed that my two nics that are bonded via mode 0 are showing the same mac addy in ifconfig. Is this normal? In syslog I keep getting; kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address Some guidance is appreciated before I dive in and troubleshoot. If I don't list the mac addy in my ifcfg-th# files, only one of the 2 nic comes up during boot.

Hi all, we are testing CentOS 7 in order to migrate from Scientific Linux 6 / CentOS 6 and we are facing an issue with the network. Trying to configure network with teaming in activebackup mode or also with bonding in mode=1 (active backup as well) we see many RX dropped packets in the bond0 interface (around 10% of the total), 100% RX drops in the backup interface and 0% in the active interface.

Hi! Is it HTB fully compatible with BOND interface? I have this setup (mode= fault tolerance) : BOND0 -> ETH0 + ETH1 BOND1 -> ETH2 + ETH3 ( http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt ) HTB work very well with Class over BOND0. If I add Class for BOND1 it generate balance errors. Also with HTB.init

took a couple months off due to road blocks, hoping a fresh look would allow me to use my server as desired. I have three ports, eth0-2 over two nics. I want to bond them, and then use a bridge to connect to virtual machines on the virtual host computer. Never having done this, I am confused on some parts. Here is where I am at now and any pointers helpful. Single server, centos 6.x My issue

Hi all, Read many posts on the subject. Using 802.3ad. Few problems; Cannot ping some hosts on the network, they are all up. Cannot resolve via DNS which is one of the hosts that I cannot ping, internal nor external DNS hosts. Unplugging the NICS and plugging them back in will then not allow pining if the default d=gateway. When cold booting it somewhat works, some hosts are pingable while

Am 28.03.16 um 12:12 schrieb Leon Fauster: > Am 28.03.2016 um 11:27 schrieb G?tz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>: >> We have three supermicron servers with two 10Gb Ports each, connected to a cisco switch stack 1Gb ports. All are on auto speed. >> >> I configured a LACP bond on both sides on all servers, first with citrix xen server. >> >> On

Hi all, I've setup a ethernet bond on my centos 5.6 server , when i do a reboot the bond does come up but cleared all the slaves and i've to manually re-add them with ifenslave. does anyone know a solution to this? am i missing something? offcourse i can add it to my rc.local but there must be a more elegant way. please see my configs below Thanks, Wessel ifcfg-bond0: DEVICE=bond0

I have a machine I just deployed w/ tg3 interfaces, I have setup bonding on this same line of server (HP DL380 G4) a million times. I saw there were changes recently to how you configure a bond and have my setup configured according to: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-7431 The HP switch has a LACP trunk defined on the two ports. Problem is, when rebooting, I need to issue a `service network

Hi, I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding device via kickstart (via PXE). I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces. Instead of the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave and an independent, non-bonded network device. Also the bonding device

Hello, I have a server with 4 NICS running CentOS 5.2. I have bonded the interfaces together such that 'bond0' consists of eth0-3. This is not a problem, and works fine. However, I now need to create a virtual interface. In a non-bonded server I would just create something like eth0:1, but with a bonded interface I am a bit confused. I have created bond0:1 simple by copying the

Hello all, I have been running xen for a while now with two interfaces: dummy0 for host only communication, and eth0 for the outside network. my script looks like this: (/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge-more) ------------------------------------------------------------------ #! /bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=dummy0

I use bonding under CENTOS4.5 x32_62. I have these weird messages when I'm restarting network. Do you have any ideas how to fix this? (there is similar bug for centos5 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2404, but the author says that it worked for him in centos4...) Thanks Vitaly Dec 17 08:34:21 3_10 kernel: bonding: Warning: the permanent HWaddr of eth0 - 00:1A:64:0A:DC:9C - is still in

Hi All, I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as expected. When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing for my other monitoring

On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as >> expected. >> When I restart

I noticed I got a strange connection from what seems to be a user in italy?!? and he connected to my SMB client maybe?? I'm assuming the errors in his logfile ( http://68.48.247.187/log.gustavo.txt ) not finding the service.c file are because he is being denied access.. but how is he connecting in the first place.. And why isnt he being refused by my servers hosts.deny file...? I have

Hi, I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1). All is working fine. However, I would like to specify a primary interface for each bond. This means I need to specify different options to the bonding module for each bond. I have tried every conceivable incantation of options and cannot get the

Hi! I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the corresponding configuration for the master is ( /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0): TYPE=Bond BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME=bond0 DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=10.3.20.131 PREFIX=24

Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1 (for an alias ip) I just want to know if it's possible and reliable Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

Hi all: I see a lot of the errors below in /var/log/messages on my firewall: Aug 1 00:47:44 munin kernel: [109008.257109] martian source 192.168.1.5 from 127.0.0.1, on dev eth1 Aug 1 00:48:44 munin kernel: [109068.257384] martian source 192.168.1.5 from 127.0.0.1, on dev eth1 Aug 1 00:49:44 munin kernel: [109128.257509] martian source 192.168.1.5 from 127.0.0.1, on dev eth1 Aug 1 00:50:44

Hi, This may sound crazy but I will go ahead anyway. Here's my scenario: ifconfig bond0 10.10.10.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 ifenslave bond0 eth0 ifenslave bond0 eth1 brctl addbr stp0 brctl addif stp0 bond0 brctl stp stp0 on Is this a valid scenario? I am trying to bond two interfaces and run STP over the bonded interface..The problem I am trying to solve is to run STP over aggregated links