similar to: irqbalance on Guest

On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 03:10 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > (copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be

(copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be overkill. Would it? I thought irqbalance is actually required even for native with

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:linux Bug #577788 [src:xen] dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance Bug reassigned from package 'src:xen' to 'src:linux'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #577788 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #577788 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 SMP kernels

Hi All, If I turn off irqbalance xen/arch/x86/irq.c, does that actually stop XEN from balancing irqs across different physical cpus, or will that override the setting if there are too many interrupts and one of the cpus is overloaded. Example: i have 4 cpus and i have configured irqbalance= off, so there is no irqbalancing done by xen. Now if i have affintized all my physical interrutps to one

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 577788 src:xen Bug #577788 [src:linux-2.6] dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance Warning: Unknown package 'src:linux-2.6' Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'src:xen'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #577788 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed

Have 4 xen servers with windows domains. 2 work OK and 2 have xp domains with slow network performance. Doing most of the testing on a xen system that currently is not in production. Running xen 4.0 with 2.6.32 kernel from lenny backports. Have xp service pack3 freshly installed with no updates. Installed gplpv gplpv_XP_0.11.0.213.msi hdtack gives 60mb/sec which is good iperf gives ~15Mbits/sec

In the past I have used clonzilla under xen to backup windows domains. I just tried it and it will not work. this is xen 4.1.2 and clonzilla-live 1.2.10-14 the disk line is: disk = [ ''phy:/dev/xvg0/nfdlts-c,hda,w'', ''file:/extra/isoimages/clonzilla.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'' ] It boots cd OK. The problem is devices are xvda not hda and clonzilla is not happy with

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0096 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0096.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c9d21f1ccbda1fd26b75f29aeb8632a8027d588ff13b28618d61f46467a8bf3b irqbalance-1.0.4-8.el6_5.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0489 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0489.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6c4dd1990742ad44b298b0c344ffed77ad7bc556950b926fcfe18eea77214859 irqbalance-1.0.4-9.el6_5.i686.rpm x86_64:

On 4/4/19 3:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:09:18 -0500 > John McMonagle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I managed to do migration using "classicupgrade". >> Doing tests with debian buster 2:4.9.4+dfsg-4. >> For the moment using samba internal dns and sub-domain of >> ad.advocap.org. Had issue

After updating to centos 4.3, I notice a failure in terminating irqbalance whenever i shutdown the system. Checking the services after the system reboot i see the error in irqbalance: "irqbalance dead but subsys locked" Can anyone tell me what irqbalance is and if it safe to disable it ? Why i dont see it in centos 4.2? Thanks in advance. Thai

I've got several SMP machines, some running CentOS 4.3 and some running Fedora Core 4. All machine are kept fully updated. A few are Pentium3-based and a few are Pentium4-based. They are all running the irqbalance daemon. The distribution of interrupts across CPUs is indeed kept balanced, yet even after months of uptime ps shows no CPU use whatsoever by irqbalance. This from a

On 3/19/19 2:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:04:27 -0500 > John McMonagle <johnm at advocap.org> wrote: > >> I'm open to alternatives but need to be up and running 24/7 on the >> linux side. >> My boss hates windows more than I do and will likely be looking for a >> new job if I use windows to administer the the linux side.

I am running irqbalance with default configuration on an Atom 330 machine. This CPU has 2 physical cores + 2 SMT (aka Hyperthreading) cores. As shown below the interrupt for the eth0 device is always on CPUs 0 and 1, with CPUs 2 and 3 left idle. But why? Maybe irqbalance prefers physical cores? My understanding, though, is that the even-numbered CPUs are the physical cores, with the

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0552 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0552.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6e8269873c1c7ace5c06cc542df05d9ef3be3d3cac8bc7c5ca3de75594223a98 irqbalance-0.55-30.el6_2.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1157 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1157.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e1a19a11f0053339035178325626edb17e0c89be3121cdd39c6ab2b62f720024 irqbalance-0.55-35.el6_3.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1066 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1066.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5dbee5fc629d67f3e0f8b6483c1ba928dd30a186de4c532e42ad9494700fba74 irqbalance-1.0.4-4.el6_4.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1191 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1191.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 0ec224e1af235b81234eea49486b3cf28562457ce4c67ae3da06cdc7e5f4ba37 irqbalance-0.55-16.el5_11.i386.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:0514 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0514 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b239ee5fa1a53baebaa441ac91cedf2dc18881ef2e84d2a1af47cc0d08138470 irqbalance-1.0.7-8.el6_9.1.i686.rpm x86_64: