similar to: WebRTC / Rejecting secure audio stream errors

Hello, I was testing with sdp and something came up worth asking: While calling from a webrtc client to another (chrome, sip.js) Asterisk receives the following sdp and rejects it with 488 Not Acceptable. Why does this happen, what's wrong with the sdp? The second sdp body below is accepted instead. Both have rtp profile RTP/SAVPF, difference is that the second one was produced by rtpengine,

I am using Asterisk 11.3.0 and just updated Nightly to 24.0a1 (2013-06017) and get a SIP 488 Not Acceptable Here response. I have no problems using the same Asterisk configuration and the same page to make a call from Chrome. I have seen other people post a similar issue, but I have not seen a solution. If someone with good knowledge of this issue were to respond with "this is a known

Hi All. I'm running some tests with the latest Asterisk SVN-branch-12-r410493M compiled with fresh github pjsip and srtp 1.4.2 on an i386 centOS machine (2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.i686). As a client I'm using the sipMLP WebRTC javascript softphone running on Chrome 33.0.1750.146 m. I have the softphone correctly registered on the Asterisk machine but as soon as I try to start a new call

hi, is there someone with working asterisk13+chan_sip+SIP.js/sipml5 ? or is chan_pjsip better supported? or the recommended way for asterisk is use respoke.io? my problem with asterisk13+chan_sip+sipml5(the same problem is with SIP.js) chan_sip.c:10496 process_sdp: Can't provide secure audio requested in SDP offer " sip.conf (important parts) [vr1a882] ... nat=force_rport,comedia

Hello I am trying to set up webRTC video calls from my Chrome webbrowser (Fedora) to my Chrome webbrowser (Windows 10). There is local video input (I can see myself), but never video on the receiving side. This is the case in both directions (so it makes no difference which peer is calling which peer). Both webRTC SIP peers have opus and H264 codec in their peer definition :   Video

Hello Using Asterisk 12.8.2. I now have the "via ICE" messages in the RTP debug (see below). If you look in the SIP debug (see below), you also now see the "ice-ufrag" and "ice-pwd" in the 200 OK SIP-message from Asterisk to the webRTC client. But still no audio ! None at all ! In both directions. You can see in the SIP debug that the IP-address in de

Hello I'm trying for several days now to get ICE support for my Asterisk 11.23 on CentOS 6. My call setup : sipml5_webRTC (nat) --> public Asterisk on 178.18.90.230 --> softphone Zoiper (problem : no audio) Reverse does not work either. (problem : failed get local SDP) I followed this guide : https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/WebRTC+tutorial+using+SIPML5

Greetings, I've noticed a problem that might originate from my Asterisk configuration, could use a hand in sorting it out. Problem is a 488 response from Asterisk whenever it gets RTP/SAVPF profile in the SDP. My current setup has Asterisk Kamailio realtime integration, and Kamailio uses dispatcher to route calls for Asterisk to handle. Now I have only one Asterisk, on the same machine as

Dear All, I use sipml5 to register two users from browser and the two clients are successfully connected. But when I made a call from one of the users, the other user doen'st have call notification and for a while the calling process ended. I check the /var/log/asterisk/messages got the following log: [Dec 17 14:54:11] WARNING[11471][C-00000000] chan_sip.c: Received SAVPF profle in audio

Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain

facing problem with originating webrtc calls 1-when iam doing call from webrtc iget ice working <--- SIP read from WS:91.196.158.205:1466 ---> INVITE sip:0669197533 at 77.91.132.9 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/WS 7cvtd9ihs2e8.invalid;branch=z9hG4bK8749315 Max-Forwards: 69 To: <sip:0669197533 at 77.91.132.9> From: "Anton" <sip:1065 at 77.91.132.9>;tag=5i21qaop43 Call-ID:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.63 Severity: normal Tags: patch spamassassin is now reporting Unix domain sockets in the rport field. I'm not exactly sure what changed to cause this to happen; it started after an upgrade whose only remotely relevant package was razor. I think the following pattern in ignore.d.server/spamd will work ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

I'm using v11.11 I tried setting: force_avp=yes in a SIP peer in sip.conf and it seems to be ignored. The WebRTC client sends an INVITE with "RTP/SAVPF" and Asterisk is still sending back 183 and 200 responses with the UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF string Are there some limitations with this option or does it depend on any other settings? Is there any debugging I can enable to

with wireshark i need decrypt traffic every call which is time consuming. get debug from pjnat through asterisk is not possible because of technical reasons or nobody did it? in my case its strange that ice candidates are the same good call v=0 o=- 3669976329745317845 2 IN IP4 127.0.0.1 s=- t=0 0 a=msid-semantic: WMS EoNIdKcMZvWBLULGqGPJTDe12ujjFEemeapo m=audio 52421 RTP/SAVPF 8 0 101 c=IN

-- Luca Pradovera luca.pradovera at gmail.com Hello, sorry, I managed to lose the reply amidst the traffic. What we have here is our application server APP with leg A in AsyncAGI in an Adhearsion application, which after some magic dials leg B on the office PBX through a configured peer. Leg B then decides that user C knows more about the subject, and initiates a blind transfer to C?s phone

Hi, I spent the past week experimenting with webrtc + asterisk 11.9.0-rc1 + opus/vb8 codec patch. This is interesting technology and I try to find out how to connect all the moving parts. Firefox: Neither sipml5 or jssip works with calls to asterisk, audio/video doesn't matter. WARNING[977][C-00000005] chan_sip.c: Rejecting secure audio stream without encryption details: audio 35684

Asterisk is on public IP (as described in the first email) i have 10 years experience in voip, 4 years webrtc in production. i know about ICE/STUN/DTLS-SRTP. yes, not every detail but the basic mechanism but i confess. i dont understand WHY Asterisk SOMETIMES switches destination IP in RTP. this is not only about ICE. its about RTP engine too which is Asterisk specific and Asterisk DEBUG is

I am having trouble getting Google Chrome to accept a WebRTC call coming from Asterisk, even though Firefox can (now) accept the same call without issue. My setup is as follows: Server: CentOS 7 x86_64 (Elastix 4 RC) with IP: 10.1.0.4 192.168.5.146 asterisk-11.21.0 patched to work around https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25659 openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.2.x86_64 [root at elx4 ~]#

I've just done a test with a WebRTC client connecting to the repro proxy with the SIP messages relayed over TCP to Asterisk Asterisk successfully answers the call using SAVPF, SRTP and ICE. The client is greeted by the demo This was tested in the Asterisk 11 environment described in my earlier email about SRTP build issues on the asterisk-users list. This is quite useful because it proves

Hi, I am using chrome version 36 and opera with asterisk 11.9.0 and cent os I am getting the below error if i do call on sipml5 from blink 1. Failed to set remote offer sdp: Called with SDP without DTLS fingerprint. tsk_utils.js?svn=224:128 1. tsk_utils_log_errortsk_utils.js?svn=224:128 2. tmedia_session_jsep01.onSetRemoteDescriptionError