similar to: PJSIP - Using multiple AOR contacts when dialing through an endpoint

Hello, I have installed the latest version 12 that has been released (12.1.0.rc3). I have setup default dtmf mode (rfc47..) but when I am calling to a endpoint that doesn't support it (no telephony event in the rtpmap) the asterisk responds OK in the signalling but DTMF is not working. Is it a known issue? Below you can see the output of the asterisk monitor. <--- Received SIP request

Dear List It's probably been more than a year now I switched from chan_sip to pjsip. pjsip works much cleaner than chan_sip. But! I have come across a Problem I was not able to solve with Asterisk Dialplan Logic. With pjsip an endpoint can have multiple AOR, so you need to expand them with ${PJSIP_DIAL_CONTACTS()} to be able to Dial() all of them simultaneously. But there are also

Thanks for responding, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:45 PM, George Joseph <george.joseph at fairview5.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio G?mez Soto < > antonio.gomez.soto at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. >> Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact.

Hi all, (sending this again from the correct address) I'm running Asterisk 13.8.0 (I need to check if that happens with 13.9.1 too when I have the time to build it) with PJSIP realtime config. I've defined several aors in the table ps_aors, like this (real url replaced by myurl): *CLI> pjsip show aor pbx-node-1 Aor: <Aor..............................................>

Hi, Yes, we're implementing the dialplan in realtime too. Here the contents of sorcery.conf: [res_pjsip] endpoint=realtime,ps_endpoints aor=realtime,ps_aors contact=realtime,ps_contacts [res_pjsip_endpoint_identifier_ip] identify=realtime,ps_endpoint_id_ips Cheers, Francisco. From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf

Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: > > So basically, the 'contact' in the AOR is just an ip address (or > 'dynamic', in which case it accepts > incoming registrations). A contact is a SIP term, it's a way of getting to something. (IP address+port) > So what happens if one endpoint has multiple AOR's which are registered > from different ip addresses. > And

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio G?mez Soto < antonio.gomez.soto at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. > Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. > > I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings > on a phone. > There's some info on the wiki here...

Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: <snip> > > I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a > one-to-one relationship. > > So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but > an aor > can exist without an auth, why was the auth object created in the first > place, > instead of extending the aor object with username/password/etc

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: > > <snip> > > >> I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a >> one-to-one relationship. >> >> So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but >> an aor >> can exist without an auth, why

Joshua, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: [..snip..] > Also I notice, an AOR does seem do be directly correlated with an auth >> record, so why are >> they separate in the configuration, why not unify the aor and the auth >> objects? >> > > They aren't at all. Auth = Authentication. Used to authenticate

Hello, I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings on a phone. Suppose I have a phone with two line buttons, for two extension numbers. Now, I think that means two 'endpoints' in pjsip right? But what exactly is the difference between

I don't know why you have issues using different names. I have multiple AORs assigned to a single endpoint and it works fine. I have to admit that my AORs do contain the endpoint name, though. For example, for endpoint "myswitch" I have two AORs, "myswitch_1" and "myswitch_2", and I assign them to the endpoint with aors=myswitch_1,myswitch_2. When you say that

I just finished installing Asterisk 13 on our test server and I can now use PJSIP to register phones and make and receive calls. The only problem I am having is that when I register multiple phones to a single account only one of them rings. The AOR for the account has maxcontacts at 3. If I do a pjsip show endpoints I can see two "Contact" entries which I take to mean that

Dan Cropp wrote: > I am running asterisk 13.1.0 > > In pjsip.conf, the endpoint section has an aors and an auth field. > > I can name the auth field anything I want. The key is to set the > auth=field accordingly. > > However, when I try this with the aors field, it never works. It seems I > have to name the aors=field to match the name of the endpoint section. > >

Le sam. 18 juil. 2020 à 08:02, Andrew Yager <andrew at rwts.com.au> a écrit : > Hi, > > I realise this is an old question, but I’m struggling to get my head > around it. > > The ERD suggests that endpoints can link to multiple AoRs > > In what situation would you actually use this? Given that mapping of > inbound calls is primary done to the endpoint, > In my

I just realized that you are asking about dynamic AORs, not static Contacts in an AOR. That may be the difference. I have never actually tried giving a dynamic AOR a different name. And you wouldn't want more than one dynamic AOR, you'd just use an AOR that allowed more than 1 contact. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:59 PM Trey Hilyard <kctrey at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know

Hi, I realise this is an old question, but I’m struggling to get my head around it. The ERD suggests that endpoints can link to multiple AoRs In what situation would you actually use this? Given that mapping of inbound calls is primary done to the endpoint, it looks to me like most of the scenarios where this might be beneficial are actually not possible? One example I had envisaged was being

I am running asterisk 13.1.0 In pjsip.conf, the endpoint section has an aors and an auth field. I can name the auth field anything I want. The key is to set the auth=field accordingly. However, when I try this with the aors field, it never works. It seems I have to name the aors=field to match the name of the endpoint section. Is this correct? Would there ever be a need for multiple aors to

Has anyone successfully used Mysql realtime PJSIP with Asterisk 13.11? I have tried 13.11, 13.11.1 and 13.11.2 but I always get the following error now: Sep 12 14:42:35] WARNING[24498]: res_config_mysql.c:1162 require_mysql: Realtime table general at ps_contacts: column 'qualify_timeout' cannot be type 'int(10)' (need char) [Sep 12 14:42:35] WARNING[24498]:

I have an endpoint with multiple phones registered as aor contacts. When I attempt to originate a call it will only ring one of the phones. Is it possible to ring multiple phones as a single endpoint. First phone to answer wins the call and all others terminated? Again, using AMI. Dan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: