similar to: New SAMBA 4.x appliance available for testing and feedback

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:03:58PM +0300, Pavel Butsykin wrote: > On 27.04.2017 18:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > >On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:55:10PM +0300, Pavel Butsykin wrote: > >>The flag determines the behavior of working with the appliance, and specifically > >>the choice to use the build supermin appliance or the fixed appliance. If the >

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:55:10PM +0300, Pavel Butsykin wrote: > The flag determines the behavior of working with the appliance, and specifically > the choice to use the build supermin appliance or the fixed appliance. If the > flag is false then the libguestfs will only use the fixed appliance, otherwise > the build supermin appliance. > > This patch is aimed at solving the

Vielen Dank f?r Ihr Interesse an Hapag-Lloyd Express. Wir werden Ihre Nachricht gerne so bald als m?glich beantworten. Bitte beachten Sie unsere ?ffnungszeiten montags-freitags 09.00 - 18.00 Uhr. Gerne k?nnen Sie auch in unserem HLX-Servicecenter anrufen. Sollten Sie R?ckfragen zu einer bestehenden Buchung haben, geben Sie bitte Ihre Buchungsnummer an. von/from Austria 0820 500 742

Incase anyone is interested this issue was caused by turning on brick multiplexing. Switching it off made the problem go away... *Gary Lloyd* ________________________________________________ I.T. Systems:Keele University Finance & IT Directorate Keele:Staffs:IC1 Building:ST5 5NB:UK +44 1782 733063 <%2B44%201782%20733073> ________________________________________________ On 31 May 2017

On 03/15/2016 21:34, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I was looking at Clear Containers last week. > [...] > > This is all very good analysis. Thanks, looks like I raised the question at a good time :) > > The issues that I had in brief were: > > (1) We could run kvmtool, perhaps by adding a new backend, but it > seems a better idea to add the required features to qemu.

> On Tue Feb 11 06:01:10 UTC 2014, Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi all! > > We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. > Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern > questions which we're fumbling with. > > So if you know anyone who is using it in production? If, so, how? In > particular, would you be happy with

On 20/02/14 14:53 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >Adam Litke <alitke at redhat.com> writes: >>> On Tue Feb 11 06:01:10 UTC 2014, Rusty Russell wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. >>> Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern >>> questions which

I have been trying to write a function for the following problem: Suppose I have three vectors a,b,c of different lengths: e.g. a=c(a1,a2,a3,...) where a[i] form the basis of our function variables: if we define a table for example: and define the fn(x) <-function{..sum(argument)..} where x<-c(a,b,c) so that we can maximise fn(x) as:

On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 13:51:20 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > tests/disks/test-add-disks.c | 9 +++++++++ > utils/max-disks/max-disks.pl | 1 + > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/disks/test-add-disks.c b/tests/disks/test-add-disks.c > index a7365d1d1..f3eb87bb4 100644 > --- a/tests/disks/test-add-disks.c > +++

Dear samba and samba-technical lists, The Samba Team is working towards getting a Version 4.0 released. In oder to ease testing of the Active Directory features of Samba4, even for people who don't want to download and compile the source code, SerNet (http://www.sernet.de/) has created a software appliance based on current Samba master snapshots. The major purpose of this is to make it very

--- tests/disks/test-add-disks.c | 9 +++++++++ utils/max-disks/max-disks.pl | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/disks/test-add-disks.c b/tests/disks/test-add-disks.c index a7365d1d1..f3eb87bb4 100644 --- a/tests/disks/test-add-disks.c +++ b/tests/disks/test-add-disks.c @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[]) guestfs_h *g; char *tmpdir; ssize_t n = -1; /*

Frank, Thanks for the reply so what I did in the interim was unistalled Hmisc and chron and used version 3.0-2 of Hmisc which doesn't have the dependency on chron, and reinstalled its version 1.1.4 However I still heave the issue, when I try to run the quantile command on the given dataset. Thanks, ~Lloyd Gilroy, Lloyd (GTI) wrote: > I currently have an instance of R running on

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:49:19AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > No. And it's exactly what I mean. The ballooned memory is still > > > processed during live migration without skipping. The live migration code is > > in migration/ram.c. > > > > So if guest acknowledged VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST, we can > > teach qemu to skip these pages. >

Adam Litke <alitke at redhat.com> writes: >> On Tue Feb 11 06:01:10 UTC 2014, Rusty Russell wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. >> Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern >> questions which we're fumbling with. >> >> So if you know anyone who is

Adam Litke <alitke at redhat.com> writes: >> On Tue Feb 11 06:01:10 UTC 2014, Rusty Russell wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We're debating the design of the balloon for the OASIS spec. >> Noone likes the current one, but there are fundamental usage pattern >> questions which we're fumbling with. >> >> So if you know anyone who is

Currently the tests fail on x86 with recent kernels: FAIL: test-255-disks.sh This confused me for a while because our other test program (utils/max-disks/max-disks.pl) reports that it should be possible to add 255 disks. Well it turns out that the default amount of appliance memory is sufficient if you're just adding disks, but if you try to add _and_ partition those disks there's

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 03:27:54PM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:40:06PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:49:19AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > > > > No. And it's exactly what I mean. The ballooned memory is still > > > > > > processed during live migration without skipping. The

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 03:27:54PM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:40:06PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:49:19AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > > > > No. And it's exactly what I mean. The ballooned memory is still > > > > > > processed during live migration without skipping. The

Please remove my post [Samba] HELP!!!! Access denied. Source file may be in use Goldston, Lloyd (SAIC) lloyd.goldston <mailto:samba%40lists.samba.org?Subject=%5BSamba%5D%20HELP%21%21%21%21%20Acc ess%20denied.%20Source%20file%20may%20be%20in%20use&In-Reply-To=> at us.army.mil Wed Jul 23 19:33:08 GMT 2003 I listed too much detail in my contact field and would appreciate it if you

OK. Different mailing lists are set up differently. This list is unusual because your answers only go to the person who replied to you. So if you want the other people on the listserv to see your answer, you should make sure that Speex-dev at xiph.org<mailto:Speex-dev at xiph.org> is added to the TO: field of your outgoing message. Hopefully someone else will also attempt to answer your