similar to: BIND9_DLZ and Reverse Lookups

Hello rowland, > > hang on a bit, the Debian link is for bind 9.8.x and the dlz reference > is for 9.8.1.dfsg-1. > I don?t recomend to use Bind 9.8.1 / 9.8.2 anymore - most distro use it but the shuold move due DLZ compile & bind bugs. and 9.8 soon goes on end of Life see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01211/81/BIND-9.8.8-Release-Notes.html > Rowland > This just

Hi everybody, According to my ddns denied problem with bind dlz zone i tried the internal dns server from samba4. The forward lookup zone is still working correctly and do ddns updates for my win7 Client. But when i create the reverse zone with the windows remote admin tools and restart samba4 the ddns isn't working for the reverse zone. No ip adresses will be added. How can i configure

It seems like the BIND 9.8 that ships with CentOS 6.x (and probably RHEL 6.x) is not built with --with-dlopen option. Platform: CentOS 6.5 BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.23.rc1.el6_5.1 Error seen: RuntimeError: kinit for HOSTNAME$EXAMPLE.COM failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm) Background: Trying to setup Samba 4 using an existing install of BIND 9.8 as the DNS backend. However,

On 4/5/20 7:14 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/04/2020 17:47, Arne Zachlod via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm currently in the process of updating our Samba environment from >> 4.3 to 4.11. Looks like I did something wrong. Some pointers would be >> much appreciated. >> >> Since I wanted to migrate from Ubuntu to Debian anyway, I

Dear Roland, and here we have one reasons / prove regarding Debian and current Samba BIND DLZ issues : http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/bind9/bind9_9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u3_changelog MSG >> " * disable dlz until we get a patch to make it build again" Well Debian Maintainers seems seeking missing the dlz patches that RHEL & SLES maintainers created

I'm not an expert in idmap (at all in fact :p) but I thought idmap stuffs were here to replace RFC2307 UID/GID declared into AD/LDAP objects. In others words, if you configure correctly idmap into smb.conf I expect you don't need any more declaring UID/GID for machine accounts. Anyway here my machines get access to their GPO: I tested one computer's GPO this morning, the one giving

> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try > to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start. > > Let's just recap > > You have run 'samba_upgradedns' > You have altered smb.conf > You have configured 'named.conf' correctly > The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this

Hello , review bind9 options ... >> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: starting BIND 9.9.5-7-Debian -u >> bind -4 >> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: built with '--prefix=/usr' >> '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' >> '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--enable-threads'

Last month I struggled with a severe DLZ issue and today I could solve it. Credits for the important idea go to Peter Serbe, thanks! I checked the DNS contents using RSAT. There was nothing wrong with SOA nor NS entries, but the reverse zones were actually forward zones with proper names in the in-addr.arpa. domain. I built proper reverse zones and deleted the forward-reverse zones and Bind

Set auth-nxdomain yes; And stop/start bind9 Other source : https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2015/09/10/a-description-of-the-dns-dynamic-update-message-format/ /snap The DNS Client and Server services support the use of dynamic updates, as described in Request for Comments (RFC) 2136, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System." The DNS Server service allows dynamic

To see which DC is used by Windows client: open a MSDOS console, type "set", look for LOGONSERVER=\\<your_dc> <your_dc> is the DC used to connect on. If issue comes from one DC I would have on sysvol synchronisation between DC, ACL on all sysvol, DNS entries (but I don't think that's a DNS issue if you have only GPO issue). 2016-03-29 14:51 GMT+02:00 Sébastien Le

Dear Rowland , Just keep in mind that the Debian RPI maintated by rasperry.org PI fellows and _not_ mainly by the Mainsteam debian pkg maintainers, and ways behind the main distro - allmost. > > Even though there is no mention of dlopen, samba_dlz works. > yes/no ->> its not displaying the DLZ file open <<- and that happen even on my now +1J old samba4.0 RPI samba4 ad.

Hi I have s4 with bind9 working fine. I see that it sets up a forward zone without using zone files (is that the dlz bit?) Is it possible to get it to produce a reverse zone? Thanks, Steve pp lcb

Dear Samba experts, Since a couple of days I am trying to fix my domain. I have each two ADDCs on raspis on two sites. One is running on Raspian and works fine. The other three are on Gentoo and something is broken there. When I point the name resolution in resolv.conf to the Raspian machine the dynamic updates are just working fine: # horus /srv/samba/demoshare # samba_dnsupdate --verbose

Hello, I'm seeing a huge performance regression with Samba 4.7.3 DLZ and BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.4.  If I remove DLZ external DNS requests are a few ms.  If it is enabled then internal and external DNS requests are a 1-3 seconds or timeout.  Downgrading BIND had no effect. I reverted just the DLZ modules back to 4.7.0 and performance is back to normal: # cp

Hello, I download krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm<http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm>from http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/. In Cenos 6.5, I use following instructions: rpm -i krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm rpmbuild -ba /home/mockbuild/rpmbuild/SPECS/krb5.spec The RPMs that has been

It is part of the Sernet packages and is currently on 1.3.4 /usr/lib64/samba/libldb.so.1.3.4 We started using sernet-samba-ad from v4 using the internal dns and updated as versions were released. We have now recently updated from 4.8.2 to 4.8.3 and still using internal dns. Our DNS is working as it should, it's only been since recently that we have to migrate to bind9. On Mon, Jul 30, 2018

Hi all I've given up on the idea that I can make a script to import our <domain>-zone into samba internal dns with samba-tool as it gets really messy with subdomains. Instead I'm now trying to get samba4 to let bind handle the <domain>-zone as well als dynamic updates and such. The problem is that once I've started named and samba4 after provisioning, I try to test

W dniu wto, 16.10.2018 o godzinie 18∶25 +0100, użytkownik Rowland Penny via samba napisał: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:47:30 +0200 > "Zuzanna K. Filutowska via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I have a setup with samba acting as active directory domain > > controller, DNS updates are done via bind DLZ. I have

Hello, on my Samba AD with BIND DLZ backend it looks like Reverse Updates did not work. dig winclient.example.com resolve an IP dig -x IP does not resolve the hostname In the bind log I see client 192.168.30.148#57598: update 'example.com/IN' denied my named.conf // This is the primary configuration file for the BIND DNS server named. // // Please read