similar to: New Wiki HowTo: Restoring deleted AD objects

Hi, I'm using Samba 3.2.5 on Debian Lenny, and I need to set the password for a certain user to expire on a specific date (not "now", it's a date in the future). When I was on Debian Etch I could use this: pdbedit -r -u user --time-format=%d-%m-%Y --pwd-must-change-time=<date> But it seems this option for pdbedit is not available anymore in the Samba version included

Hello, on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:13:19 -0800 Eric Woltermann posted: > for some weeks now I am trying to set up Samba4 (alpha9) with an OpenLDAP 2.4.17 backend as an AD PDC for my XP/7 clients. It was working for some time with Samba's integrated LDAP facility, however I could not figure out how to use this database e.g. to authenticate my IMAP users against (bind-dn, port etc.). OpenLDAP

Hi . I upgraded my samba4 servers from 4.1.17 to 4.2.1 . After upgrading , the samba4 servers becomed very slow and these error logs occured : [2015/04/27 08:09:08.279400, 1] ../source4/rpc_server/backupkey/dcesrv_backupke y.c:1423(bkrp_do_retrieve_server_wrap_key) Unable to fetch value for secret BCKUPKEY_34847c15-efd9-4430-ba82-bf7d3160e9e1 , are we an undetected RODC? [2015/04/27

That's great thanks, One thing tho I did a "ls /etc/dovecot" and I don't see a dovecot-ldap.conf Do I need to create that file or install it via yum? Thanks again for your help, very much appreciated Rob Sent from my Windows Phone -----Original Message----- From: "Daniel Tr?der" <troeder at univention.de> Sent: ?26/?06/?2015 07:20 To: "dovecot at

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am Montag, den 01.04.2019, 19:36 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > > On 1 April 2019 19:29 Nico St?ckigt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.or > > g> wrote: > > > > ? > > Hi, > > > > are there any known issues with dovecot/director (2.2.13) when > > receiving e-an mail with multiple receivers? In the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, are there any known issues with dovecot/director (2.2.13) when receiving e-an mail with multiple receivers? In the given scenario the e-mail contains 3 recipients and is redirected by the director to 3 different mail servers (ox/dovecot @ UCS/univention). In this process the first 2 e-mails are just fine but the third e-mail is truncated

Dear list, Does anybody know how to lower the tombstone lifetime in samba 4.5 or later? There used to be a wiki entry, but this has been deleted as it is probably not adequate anymore: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Restoring_deleted_AD_objects#Changing_the_defaults_for_msDS-deletedObjectLifetime_and_tombstoneLifetime I used to change the attribute tombstoneLifetime in CN=Directory

Sorry for top posting, don't mean to, looks like my outlook mobile client does it by default Ok great thanks Daniel for this, also do you know if I have to change/edit the config files for postfix/openldap as well or just for dovecot Thank you Rob Sent from my Windows Phone -----Original Message----- From: "Daniel Tr?der" <troeder at univention.de> Sent: ?26/?06/?2015

Hi Daniel, Hmm - I'm happy to use different 'user names' to log into Dovecot... as long as each of these logins can still subscribe to the same universe of folders I have available at present. I can envision using steve_mobile and steve_desktop as logins, as long as these still provide access to the same mailboxes as I have in steve's Maildir folder. I'm guessing that

hi, i have multi controllers domain with samba 4 and i want implement a backup method for restore ldap objects deleted accidentaly I saw this page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Restoring_deleted_AD_objects but samba have a bug in multi controllers enviroment. So, how can i do a backup for ldap tree? something like slapcat command? What recomendations can you tell me? What is the diference

[As a separate thread, I am going to do post mortem of how I got here - and what not to do. I have a locked computer logged in as this user - need to unlock and access unsaved content.] I either need to resore the user or create a new user of the same name and sid. I am using Version 4.8.2 - commit e64d0d03351ce8fbc1f929fa86dcfd8d56183f35 . Names have been changed to protect the guilty. #

==================================================================== "Harmony makes small things grow, lack of it makes great things decay." Sallust ==================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is is the latest stable release of Samba 4.0. Major enhancements in Samba 4.0.3 include: o

==================================================================== "Harmony makes small things grow, lack of it makes great things decay." Sallust ==================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is is the latest stable release of Samba 4.0. Major enhancements in Samba 4.0.3 include: o

Hi, this is a question regarding the behavior of the --update option for the recursive replication of directories. rsync 3.0.7-2 shows the following behavior on a Debian squeeze system (ext4): After running the following commands the adjusted ownership of the subdirectory /tmp/dst/sub below the target directory is overwritten and its newer modification time is reset to that of the older

Good evening team, I have read lots of topics and posts explaining why you *shouldn't* manually change a user's SID on the databases, and I agree with the "phylosophical" reasons behind it, let's say. Now, what happens if besides all the warnings you still do it?? What else might break, considering that we are careful enough to not enter a duplicate, or obvious errors? I

I have a samba dc which i recently upgraded to 4.6.4. I was looking at updating the functional level as it currently returns: Forest function level: (Windows) 2000 Domain function level: (Windows) 2000 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2000 There is only a single DC (this host). According to the documentation 2000 isn’t even supported anymore:

Dear all, My , samba-tool domain level show shows me it is W2003: [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 Can I raise without issues to W 2008 R2? Or should I stay with 2003? Greetings

Hi guys, I've been trying to work out how to set a GPO that allows certain Groups (Domain Users) a password expiry of 60 days and another group (Domain admins) an expiry of 30 days, but when looking through the Group Policy Manager I don't see how to achieve this. After looking around online I stumbled across the domain Functionality Level which if I understand means that I have to

HI!! I have one question, in samba 4.8.2 , --forest-level and --domain-level is worked 2012/2012 R2 ? samba-tool domain level --help --forest-level=FOREST_LEVEL                         The forest function level (2003 | 2008 | 2008_R2 |                         2012 | 2012_R2)   --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL                         The domain function level (2003 | 2008 | 2008_R2 |

Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise - mainstream support end-date: 1/13/2015 - extended support end-date: 1/14/2020 samba -V Version 4.6.0rc2 samba-tool domain level show ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=facility,DC=local' Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a DC: