similar to: DC Replication / samba4

Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of replication > topology? I think you have to define a topology of the domain, using ADSS: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/canitpro/2015/03/03/step-by-step-setting-up-active-directory-sites-subnets-site-links/ defining links and weight. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

Le 19/11/2018 à 12:33, Julien TEHERY via samba a écrit : > Le 19/11/2018 à 11:14, Marco Gaiarin via samba a écrit : >> Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba >>    In chel di` si favelave... >> >>> Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of >>> replication >>> topology? >> I think you have to define a topology of the domain, using

Hello List, i have a Samba Problem that is related to Sambas ldap behaviour. Problem: The standalone server ( no DC !!) tries to write an attribute to an write only ldap Slave is sent via WAN to the master write ldap. The problem results from the fact that samba never goes back to the "local" slave ldap to the "local" slave ldap so each samba request goes over an

Hello I am actually trying to build a multi sites domain. Each additionnal DC has been setup and I would like to hava a custom replication setup. In other words,  how can i choose replication target on a fresh new DC? I would like to force my sites DCs to replicate from master DCs at our office. Is it possible? Thanks Julien

Hello *, would samba / winbindd try to refresh the machine password in an AD / Kerberos Environment ? Details / Versions pls see below. thx Micha Versions: SLES 11 SP1: -------------------------------- samba-client-3.4.3-1.17.2 samba-winbind-3.2.7-11.6 samba-3.4.3-1.17.2 smb.conf: workgroup = CAD realm = CAD.SITE.NET security = ADS idmap domains = CAD

Hello * Volker, thank you for your fast help / answer :-) !!! different question: is there a (nonzero possibility, that an vendor provided samba ( SLES11 SP1 ) could try to trigger DNS Updates, in spite of the server role cited below: testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba//smb.conf Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER even if no DNS related config is done, and thus /etc/resolv.conf

Le 19/11/2018 à 11:14, Marco Gaiarin via samba a écrit : > Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of replication >> topology? > I think you have to define a topology of the domain, using ADSS: > >

Le 19/11/2018 à 15:00, Julien TEHERY via samba a écrit : > Le 19/11/2018 à 12:33, Julien TEHERY via samba a écrit : >> Le 19/11/2018 à 11:14, Marco Gaiarin via samba a écrit : >>> Mandi! Julien TEHERY via samba >>>    In chel di` si favelave... >>> >>>> Is there a good pratice when adding new remote DCs in terms of >>>> replication

Hello, i've configured a new freeradius server for WLAN authentication. My radius server is a domain member on my samba 4.7.12 ADDC. For my mschap configuration i followd this guide: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Freeradius_against_Active_Directory. The auth works! I can configure ntlm_auth in two differents way? ntlm_auth = "/path/to/ntlm_auth*--allow-mschapv2*

On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:11:36 -0400 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:45 PM, Carlos Bordon via samba wrote: > > Hi! > > > > i have 3 dcs with samba > > > > > > i demote bdc and replace it with dc2 with de same ip > > > > the replicate with dc1 is ok, and the replicate of dc3 with dc1 is > > ok,

Cordialement, Doe Corp <https://www.openevents.fr/> <https://www.facebook.com/OPENevents-172305449504004/> <https://twitter.com/SocOPENevents> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/openevents/> Julien Téhéry Ingénieur Systèmes & Réseaux | OPENevents 15 avenue de l'Europe 86170 Neuville de Poitou phone : +33 5 49 62 26 03 <tel:+33549622603> mail :

just to verify basic facts: Did you cross check vie network sniff, on which SMB protocol versions Server + Win 7 clients agree ? Or did you pin down via registry ? AFAIK only starting with win 8 or win 10 clients you could ask with powershell, which protocol version is in use. Did you also cross check samba logs for a name resolution issue ( windows names, not DNS) if one of your boxes is an

Hello, Anyone? I have hard time to believe this is not possible with chan_pjsip. Anyway, may I ask how people handle the following scenario which I imagine should be quite common: - I have internal extensions talk to each other using g722. so their codec setting (with chan_sip now) is "allow=g722,ulaw" - I have carriers trunks that handle ulaw only (allow=ulaw) - calls between

Hi Denis, Thanks for your advices. I have in mind about your kerberos problem in a large environment but i was thinking about problem occuring at 20 and more DCC's So last night, i modified all my krb5.conf (DC and file server) as you suggest but problem persist. root at dc111:~# samba-tool domain join pr.educationetformation.fr DC -U administrator --realm=PR.EDUCATIONETFORMATION.FR -W PR

Hi. I have following errors in my log file: Mar 22 05:33:11 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:11.518: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:21 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:21.418: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:41 xentest libvirtd: 05:33:41.274: error : failed Xen syscall topology cpuset syntax error Mar 22 05:33:41 xentest libvirtd:

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the

Hi all, I have been trying to find out cpu topology using libvirt. When I do 'virsh capabilites', I find this inside <topology> tag: <topology>       <cells num='1'>         <cell id='0'>           <memory unit='KiB'>3908488</memory>           <cpus num='4'>             <cpu id='0' socket_id='0'

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme

Hello Micha, we are using the sgid bit (chmod g+s <basedir>) in the base directory to inherit the group of this base-directotry to all new directories/files in it. In the smb share using this base directory you still have to set "inherit permissions=yes" which takes care of inheriting the sgid bit to new sub directories. This way all directories/files have the same group. This

Hi! Thanks for answer. But, i allowed all ports in my firewall... I tested, shutdown  my DC1 DC2 dont comunication with DC3 I create user in DC2, dont replication with DC3... I waited more in 20 minutes Why ?? Regards; On 17-05-2018 12:01, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 10:30 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have 2 DC, now add one more DC, but all dcs