similar to: debian wheezy, sernet samba 4.1.3 join Windows 2008R2 AD as DC. Success ( basic Howto included )

So I had dhcp, radvd and bind working together nicely and now I threw in a wrench of setting up an AD DC I want to change my dhcp server setting to put client's into the new AD Domain but am a little hesitant as it is all working so nicely with DDNS I'm starting to think all I need to do is edit just my dhcpd.conf and change occurrences of DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to

I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about not being able to write to bind in its zone. [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am

https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD helped me find that I needed to add options { [...] tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; [...] }; That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote: >

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 27/05/16 17:11, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD >> helped me find that I needed to add >> >> options { >> [...] >> tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; >>

After years of delays and side trips, I really am going to dive in and build my own Samba server. And I have a few questions. All of my servers will be ARM. The main hardware will be Cubieboards (2 and truck). They will be running Centos-7 once the development is finished. For now I am using Fedora 22 arm. My backup file server will be a pogoplug (armv5) with Redsleeve 7.1. My current

I am soo lost trying to get Samba AD 4.7.5 as a Kerberos source for NFSv4. The NFS server is the Samba AD server running Ubuntu Server 16.0.4.3 and the client is Linux Mint 18.3 This export WORKS and mounts on client ########## /etc/exports ########## /mnt/fileshare         *(rw,no_subtree_check,async) ############################ This export DOES NOT ########## /etc/exports ##########

So happy for BadLock bug it finally pushed Ubuntu to upgrade samba :-) So many things work better * I can now sudo without having to newgrp first * I can now run id and get a list of all groups I am in * I can now run getent group and get a list of the domain groups but I now have two unexpected groups running the following I get id | sed 's/,/\n/g' | sort > id_without.txt id $USER

On 08/28/2015 08:55 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/08/15 13:15, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> In the shower this morning, I realized that samba's dlz is through >> its ldap interface, probably through dhcp. :) >> >> All of that work researching how to set up a dlz database for >> naught. This is NOT documented in either: >> >>

Il 05/02/16 14:41, Helmut Hullen ha scritto: >> is: if a client is upgraded to Windows 10, will it still work with >> that old Samba version? > > May be - Samba 3.6 does the job. Hi, you mean that 3.2 will not talk to Windows 10, no way? Unfortunately the latest Samba version for Debian Lenny is 3.2.15 AFAIK. -- 01

thanks for the reply. On 08/23/2015 01:26 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 23/08/15 17:10, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> After years of delays and side trips, I really am going to dive in >> and build my own Samba server. And I have a few questions. >> >> All of my servers will be ARM. The main hardware will be Cubieboards >> (2 and truck). They will be running

Hai? ? Im running:?debian wheezy, sernet samba 4.1.3 , DC, in windows 2008 AD domain. ? Im reading the wiki and i stumbled on this. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind? semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone.jnl the strange thing is, and this is

Hello, I have the following problem with my bind9 together with samba 4.9 SerNet. If I start the bind9 I got the following error-message: --------------- Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=zfd,DC=forumzfd,DC=de Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: starting configure Oct 15

I think I see some heavy weather ahead of me: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/dn303411.aspx specifically w.r.t. Server 2012 r2 (with which I will have to soon(ish) wrestle): > Features Removed or Deprecated in Windows Server 2012 R2 >... > RSAT: Identity management for Unix/NIS > > The Server for Network Information Service (NIS) Tools option of > Remote Server

I think I know then. Are those groups from a local samba database? I might have deleted it in the past and when the upgrade took place it may have replaced it. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 26/04/16 18:44, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > >> So happy for BadLock bug it finally pushed Ubuntu to upgrade samba :-) >> >> So many

Am 10.07.19 um 20:38 schrieb miguel medalha via samba: > >> How could I achieve that when my client from the LAN makes a request >> to xmpp.domain.tld, SAMBA4 direct that request to pfSense and respond >> with the IP assigned to it? > > In the smb.conf file of your DCs you insert the line: > > dns forwarder = [IP address of your pfSense machine] there is no

On 10/07/2019 21:02, miguel medalha via samba wrote: > >> there is no reason why an authoritative nameserver would forward a >> request to his own domain no matter if it's samba, named or somethign >> else >> >> any authoritative nameserver is supposed to know *every* record within >> his own zones and you can't have half of them somewhere lese

Thanks Luc, First, can I just use the small /etc/krb5.conf suggested in Samba AD docs or do I need something more substantial on the server & client for Kerberos NFS to work? [libdefaults]         default_realm = SUBDOMAIN.DOMAIN.COM         dns_lookup_realm = false         dns_lookup_kdc = true I understand a /etc/krb5.keytab file has to be created on both server & client. Most

Would prefer to continue to use my NSD/Unbound installs for most DNS (if not all) services. NSD is the authoritative server for the domain, and Unbound is the cache/resolver that the clients connect to. I'd like to not disturb this setup but I'll need the SRV records so that AD works. If the SRV records are fixed I suppose I could host them using NSD, then Samba wouldn't have to be

Hai Elias, 聽 Sorry for the late reply. I do preffer the list, and i understand why you mailt my directly, but best is to keep this on the list. The more eye that see this, the more chance you have on a reply. I must say, i personaly dont use any trust relations ships. that was long ago when i used that, so im bit rusty here. 聽 Now, i see you are using my 4.8.2 packages. so you on debian. *( or

(@Rowland) > Whilst it is quite correct to say that the REALM isn't the same as a > DNS domain, there is a correlation between them. The REALM must be the > DNS domain in uppercase, so this: > > SAMBA_PRINCIPAL=dehydrated-service at YOUR.DOMAIN No, you can have your.primayDNSdomain.tld and have REALM = SOMEREALM.TLD Its not obligated to have REALM the same as the DnsDomain.