similar to: About booting Xen with UEFI on FastModel

On Mon, 6 May 2013, Chen Baozi wrote: > On Mar 25, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Chen Baozi wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I''m reading Mini-OS''s codes and to estimate the amount of work porting it to > >> ARM (Ian''s GSoC idea this year). >

Hi, I want to try Xen on ARMv8 Simulator. Can you please provide guidance?. I am looking for information about sources, build and procedure to launch Xen on ARMv8 Thanks & Regards Vijay

Hi, I''ve tried several different approaches to debootstrap a working rootfs for with a Cortex A15 model ( FastModels ) and Xen but still face some issues. Some information on my setup. For a Dom0 kernel I''m using the latest version from git://github.com/torvalds/linux.git, I attached my config as it might be of some use for others. I''m using the latest Xen unstable

Since OMAP UART has a few distinct features than common 8250 UART, I re-implemented its driver rather than porting it based on ns16550.c. There are mainly two big differences between the implementations. First, OMAP UART introduces the concept of register access mode, which divides the register map into seperated space. Switching the access mode is then necessary when configuring it. Second, THRE

Hi Ashi, Your first LDR is a pseudoinstruction that is supported by some tools (gas and armasm, at least), but not by LLVM. Roughly speaking, it turns into a PC-relative load from a literal pool. To do what you're trying to achieve you can write your own literal pool in your assembly. You can see some examples of this sort of thing at

Hi all, this small patch series implement guest SMP support for ARM, using the ARM PSCI interface for secondary cpu bringup. Stefano Stabellini (4): xen/arm: basic PSCI support, implement cpu_on xen/arm: support for guest SGI xen/arm: support vcpu_op hypercalls xen: move VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info to common code xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hi, all. The previous post have a typo: problem in ARM assembly: I use LDR to load an external symbol : LDR R7,=DataTable But clang gives error: unexpected token in operand to the '=', Then I change the code to: LDR R7,DataTable The error becomes: unsupported relocation on symbol. How can I get around this in clang? My problem is actually how to load external symbol in

Hi Ian, I am trying to add supporting dumping 32-bit guest on arm32 to see what happened in my dom0 kernel when booting. It seems gvirt_to_maddr() is not workable under arm32. But why has it been implemented both in include/asm-arm/arm{32,64}/page.h? Thanks. Baozi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Hi, Bernie, Thanks for your reply! However, I still have problem by following edk2's code, my test code is attached, what I want to do is build it as a dynamic lib. But I get error from ld: ld: illegal text-relocation to _data_table in table.o from foo in use_table.o for architecture armv7 Do you have any suggestion to solve this? Thanks! //==begin table.c== int data_table[] = {0xff, 0xff};

Hi Julien, Since Ian has merged most my OMAP5 patches, I decide to try to update my working tree to it today. However, it seems it doesn't work as expected. There mainly two kind of problems that I met: 1. It seems that xen no longer maps some of io memory regions described in dts. For example, the memory regions in "ocp" node of omap5.dtsi. 2. commit c88d32f4 seems to be conflict

Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <baozich@gmail.com> --- extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h | 2 +- extras/mini-os/include/x86/arch_spinlock.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h b/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h index 70cf20f..6604e3c 100644 --- a/extras/mini-os/include/spinlock.h +++

Hi, all. Another problem in ARM assembly: I use LDR to load an external symbol : LDR R7,=DataTable But clang gives error: unexpected token in operand to the '=', Then I change the code to: LDR R7,=DataTable The error becomes: unsupported relocation on symbol. How can I get around this in clang? Thanks in advance! On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Ashi <ashi08104 at

Biggest change is to switch the new DTB node to /xen-core-devices instead of /xen at Stefano''s request. I also dropped the few patches title HACK etc which weren''t supposed to be there and fixed up some bits and pieces which folks commented on. George, WRT the freeze I think this is functionality which we cannot ship Xen 4.4 without. The impact is entirely constrained to the

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I'd like to do that instead. It's fastboot doing the unreasonable thing > > > here and deviating from what every other legacy device without exception >

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I'd like to do that instead. It's fastboot doing the unreasonable thing > > > here and deviating from what every other legacy device without exception >

From: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi at gmail.com> - Delete "@request_vqs" and "@free_vqs" comments, since they are no longer in struct virtio_config_ops. - According to the macro below, "@val" should be "@v". Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi at gmail.com> --- include/linux/virtio_config.h | 11 +---------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10

From: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi at gmail.com> - Delete "@request_vqs" and "@free_vqs" comments, since they are no longer in struct virtio_config_ops. - According to the macro below, "@val" should be "@v". Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <chenbaozi at gmail.com> --- include/linux/virtio_config.h | 11 +---------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:34:03PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 02/02/17 11:26, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>> I'd like to do that instead.

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:34:03PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 02/02/17 11:26, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:19:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>> I'd like to do that instead.

Hi, Is there any information available on porting Syslinux to 64bit ARM? Specifically, I have a Cavium ThunderX board (Gigabyte R120-T30) which boots using UEFI - b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5864#ov I'd be very interested in getting this to work, as currently the only option for booting on this platform is Grub 2 or EFI Stub. If anyone can point me in the right