similar to: Samba4 in FreeBSD cannot upgrade dns

[2799/3801] Compiling source3/locking/locking.c [2800/3801] Compiling source3/locking/brlock.c ../source3/locking/brlock.c: In function 'brl_get_locks_readonly_parser': ../source3/locking/brlock.c:2071: error: expected expression before 'struct' ../source3/locking/brlock.c:2071: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast ../source3/locking/brlock.c: In function

Hello all listies. I've got samba4.0.6 running on FreeBSD 9.1. Joined W2K12 domain as member server. running getent group I noticed it takes a long time to resolve groups. The result is correct, but it is inordinately long. With 3.6.13 on FreeBSD 9.1 the return is nearly instantaneous. smb4.conf looks like this. [global] workgroup = TMS3 security = ADS realm = TMS3.COM encrypt

Hi Stefan, Thank you very much for pointing me to the wordspace package. It does the job a bit faster than my C code but is 100 times more convenient. By the way, since the tcrossprod function in the Matrix package is so fast, the Euclidean distance can be computed very fast: euc_dist <- function(m) {mtm <- Matrix::tcrossprod(m); sq <- rowSums(m*m);? sqrt(outer(sq,sq,"+") -

Hello, I have a problem with asterisk when dial out to a SIP provider. Asterisk send a INVITE with no credentials, the provider reply with a 401 Unauthorized. However, Asterisk DOES NOT resend the invite again with credentials. But it hangs there (maybe waiting for a ok) It is this a bug in asterisk or the provider is supposed to send something else rather than a 401 as answer for a INVITE ?

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin

./configure --bundled-libraries && make ............ [3638/3880] Linking default/source4/lib/policy/py-policy.so [3639/3880] Linking default/source4/auth/ntlm/libauth4.so [3640/3880] Linking default/source4/ntvfs/libntvfs.so default/source4/ntvfs/sysdep/inotify_1.o: In function `inotify_setup': inotify.c:(.text+0x503): undefined reference to `inotify_init'

What are the plans for the CentOS repos with respect to authentication and https everywhere? At the moment it is a trivial exercise to perform a MTM attack during a yum update over http. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited

Hi. I had generate a SSL cetificate. I performed following actions: mkdir /opt/LocalCA cd /opt/LocalCA mkdir certs mkdir private chmod 700 private echo '01' > serial touch index.txt cd /opt/LocalCA PATH=/opt/openssl/bin:$PATH export PATH OPENSSL_CONF=/opt/LocalCA/LocalCA.cnf export OPENSSL_CONF openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa -out cacert.pem -outform PEM -days

Hello I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC. I want use BIND for dns system. To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind. It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record. If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message: This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones. If I remove the DC the dns-names

I have a dc configured to use the samba internal dns service. The version of samba I am using is 4.10.15 packaged for FreeBSD. Its build options state this: BIND911 : off BIND916 : off , , , GSSAPI_BUILTIN : on GSSAPI_MIT : off LDAP : on . . . NSUPDATE : off My smb4.conf file contains this: [global] bind interfaces only = Yes dns forwarder =

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

On 05/04/16 20:23, Rowland penny wrote: (I understand this might be specific to FreeBSD, but I asked on its mailing list and got no answer...) >> Then why is it an option *in alternative* to BIND? > > What do you mean '*in alternative*' ?? I mean when I build Samba port, I can choose NSUPDATE *or* BIND99 *or* BIN910 (where "or" means "exclusive or",

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:38:35 +0100 Jonathan Hunter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, the code from samba_dnsupdate : > nsupdate_cmd = lp.get('nsupdate command') > [....] > cmd = nsupdate_cmd[:] > cmd.append(tmpfile) > ret = subprocess.call(cmd, shell=False, env=env) > > And > $ sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool

Dear list, one more problem. I've setup my host running a samba addc controller. Samba version is samba-4.11.6-r2. I've joined two win10 clients to my domain. One client has a static ip, the other one was configured to ask my dhcpd-daemon for an ip. Following the book from stefan kania, I modified my dhcpd.conf to execute some scripts I've found on ArchWiki to add my

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

Hi everyone my sssd log shows the nsupdate command failing, how do i test ddns separately from sssd to see if the problem is in sssd or samba. shadrock /etc/sssd/sssd.conf ------------------------------------------------- (Fri Aug 1 12:18:30 2014) [sssd[be[tissisat.co.uk]]] [be_nsupdate_timer_schedule] (0x0200): Timer already scheduled (Fri Aug 1 12:18:30 2014) [sssd[be[tissisat.co.uk]]]

hey, first, i user bind 9.8.1 as my DNS backend Well, I have a domain controller, dc1.example.com, running correctly and with the following configurations... == smb.conf == [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE realm = EXAMPLE.COM netbios name = DC1 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes server services = -dns