similar to: dsync-2.2.7 incorrectly synchronizes subscription status of renamed mailbox

Hi, It seems that dsync-2.2.2 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription status of a deleted mailbox. The situation is as follows. There are two servers: A and B, and a test user test_mdbox. Mailboxes (mdbox) of this user on both servers are synchronized. Specifically on both of them there is a Trash/x mailbox. Replication plugin is disabled. I delete Thrash/x mailbox on A with

Hi, It seems that dsync 2.1.10 does not correctly handle renames of mailbox subtrees. The scenario is as follows. There are two servers, A and B, both running dovecot 2.1.10 and configured to use mdbox. Automatic replication between them is disabled, ie. replication plugin is not active and replicator service has process_min_avail = 0. I perform the following actions: 1. On A: doveadm mailbox

I just successfully upgraded a server from v 2.2.8 to v3.0.7. When I execute smbstatus or swat it correctly shows v 3.0.7. When I browse thru network neighborhood it still shows v 2.2.8. I stopped samba, and removed /usr/local/samba/var/locks/browse.dat & wins.dat. Then restarted samba. It still reports v2.2.8 thru network neighborhood. In viewing browse.dat it shows 2.2.8. Where is this

Hello, I am trying to build dovecot-2.1.15 on Solaris 10 update 10 with Solaris Studio 12.3 and get this error: /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -fast -xipo=2 -I/usr/sfw/include -I/usr/sfw/include -no-undefined -o doveadm doveadm-mail.o doveadm-mail-altmove.o doveadm-mail-expunge.o doveadm-mail-fetch.o doveadm-mail-import.o doveadm-mail-index.o

I searched but was unable to locate a close match for this case. I doubt that Samba was the culprit here, but unus vir nullus vir. Your feedback would be appreciated. Situation: Windows clients, mostly WinXP desktops, got "no logon servers are available" when trying to access shared directories on fileservers. The Windows domain controllers run Win2k3. Member servers range from

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.8.tar.gz.sig + Mail cache lookups work for the mail being saved. This improves performance by avoiding the need to parse the mail multiple times when using some plugins (e.g. mail_log). + Mail cache works for recently cached data also with in-memory indexes. + imapc: Many performance

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.8.tar.gz.sig + Mail cache lookups work for the mail being saved. This improves performance by avoiding the need to parse the mail multiple times when using some plugins (e.g. mail_log). + Mail cache works for recently cached data also with in-memory indexes. + imapc: Many performance

Forgive what may be a newby question, but I'm trying to get a new setup working, and there are many different things confusing me. I'm trying for a gnus + dovecot + mbsync arrangement, with mbsync writing to maildirs, and gnus reading from those dirs with a dovecot invocation. Fairly standard, I think. I have multiple email accounts I'm trying to sync, all of them gmail. My problem

Hello, All: The CRAN checks for the "fda" package includes one error: The error most likely occurred in ... file.copy2 ... Error: unprotect_ptr: pointer not found Execution halted (http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian/fda-00check.html) The help page for "file.copy2" includes "\examples" with everything wrapped in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I wish to use rsync to synchronize a whole fat32 (MSWindows) partition mounted into a linux system. I run rsync from linux. The problem is rsync synchronizes most of the data even if the data hasn't changed since the original image was made. I used the -avz parameters to do the backup and the same for restoration. Also I've tried just -rvz. It

hi, I have an 20G archive of pic files which would have to be mirrored onto another server. It contains large JPEGs, around 10k files, one of the servers is located in Boston, the another is in Budapest, Hungary. I use rsync rsync://remote_box/remotedir localdir/ -zcvr --progress --size-only The issue is that the remote server sends the filelist very slow. Looking into the rsyncd process with

At 07:02 AM 11/4/2004, samba-request@lists.samba.org wrote: >Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:01:17 +0300 >From: ds_shadof@uni-altai.ru >Subject: Re: [Samba] WINS setup / browsing >To: samba@lists.samba.org >Message-ID: <5791722390.20041104140117@uni-altai.ru> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > >Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:15:55 AM, you wrote: >

Dear all, I am using VMWare and I have cloned my emails server. Now I do have two identicals servers, both running the same version of dovecot (2.2.13) and imap. Let's call them: server1.domain.ltd and server2.domain.ltd. I would like to sync both server using dsync. Dovecot is working well except concerning the sync. dsync config server1.domain.ltd # Enable the replication plugin

Hi Mike, Is the value of the 'doveadm_port' if I am choosing: mail_replica = tcp:server1.domain.ltd no ? I might be wrong too ;) Thx Le mardi 24 janvier 2017 ? 11:41:28, vous ?criviez : > Hello, > I might be wrong, but the port which will be used for the replicator > port is the value of 'doveadm_port' which in your case is 4711. > Mike; > On 01/23/2017

Hello, I'm using dovecot 1.0.7 and have a problem with subscription files. The documentation says that this file ("subscriptions" or ".subscriptions" in the root of the maildir, I've tried both) holds the informations about the subscribed folders. I've created such a file with these lines: Trash Sent Drafts INBOX.prova INBOX.prova4 And configured a client

Timo, I use mdbox and probably have similar issue, but in my case only shared mailboxes were affected. May 26 12:35:05 mx10 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(anna.harina at bgoperator.com): Error: Mailbox shared/l.davydjanc at bgoperator.com/russia: Save commit failed: Message has been copied too many times (50045 + 1) May 26 12:35:19 mx10 dovecot: dsync-local(anna.harina at

- This is an automated mail. Please do not reply, but follow the - - instructions below to continue. - You, or somebody specifying this email address, requested a free subscription to mailing list(s) managed by Gay.com UK. If you did not request this service, or you requested it and have since changed your mind, DO NOTHING. You will not be subscribed until you

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote: > Ext3-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 905448 > > We have received a request from 66.88.179.82 for subscription of your > email address, <mhaque@haque.net>, to the ext3-users@redhat.com > mailing list. To confirm the request, please send a message to > ext3-users-request@redhat.com, and either: >

confirm 639289 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 01:27:25 -0800 shorewall-devel-request@shorewall.net wrote: > Shorewall-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 168447 > > We have received a request from dummy-kddi.kddnet.de for subscription > of your email address, <s.veckes@de.kddi.com>, to the > shorewall-devel@shorewall.net mailing list. To confirm the request, > please send a message