similar to: Dovecot login slow

Hello, I tryed to eneble TLS connection from postfix to dovecot lmtp. Unfortunely I have problem with certificate, postfix shows, 2015-07-27T12:51:15.025333+02:00 k30 postfix/lmtp[4572]: Untrusted TLS connection established to 192.168.67.30[192.168.67.30]:24: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits) I checked certs by openssl s_client: #openssl s_client -connect

hi, one customer told us, that he has performance problem in his Thunderbird 3.1.9, while open his sent folder, which has round about 4000 mails in it, and 20k in his Inbox. For example TB, tries to sync the sent-folder list (over SSL) from the sent folder for now over 15min. In the log, I can't see any strange things, so for me, Dovecot works ok. Maybe, I should use better cache options?

Running rc24 and with one user in particular they are getting "(auth) killed with signal 11" when trying to pop email. IMAP works. What causes this? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070224/195f61be/attachment-0002.html>

Hi, After upgrading to dovecot 2.1.12, I see a lot of these errors: # 2.1.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.3 (Final) # Filesystem: ext4 with mdbox storage Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (5010 < 8192) Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org):

> On 25/08/2020 14:35 Robert Nowotny <rnowotny at rotek.at> wrote: > > > I get ZLIB Errors after dovecot upgrade from 2.3.10.1 to 2.3.11.3 > > > Aug 21 15:27:34 lxc-imap dovecot: imap(acsida)<63870><jZk...>: Error: Mailbox Sent: UID=40826: read(zlib(/home/vmail/virtualmailboxes/acsida/storage/m.2409)) failed:

Phillip> Users don?t create these folder. The system does based on the Phillip> configuration which is what I have to figure out. Then post your configuration details! And details on how email gets into the system and into Dovecot.

Hello, We need help with an issue that we are running into when we are trying to run Dovecot in Docker container. Also how do we enable debugging for dovecot. Logs doesn't show any info about the issue. Below processes are not running when a Director service is started: dovecot-Dovecot/auth dovecot-Dovecot/ssl-params dovecot-Director/lmtp dovecot-Director/ssl-params

I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 11.10 to 12.04.1 and that upgraded Dovecot to 2.0.19. For some reason I'm getting a lot more (5 times) disconnect in IDLE and inactivity time outs. I'm using only IMAP with two users. Both users access the server from multiple devices, phone, tablet and desktop computer. I had previously set the max_userip_connections to 20 and rarely got the

hi we are using dovecot version 2.2.7 (config file given below) centos 6, qmail, vpopmail, mysql server configuration hex core processor, 16 gb ram 1 X 600 gb 15 k rpm for main drive and 2 X 2000 gb hdd for data (No raid) busy server with around 4000 email ids --- load is around 2 to 10 the issue is that SQUIRRELMAIL webmail users suddenly lose connection while they are working on the webmail.

Hello In my installation the disable_plaintext_auth does not appear to take effect. I can see that the value is correct using doveconf -a but it doesn't change anything. Whenever attempting to log in using IMAP I get this: * BAD [ALERT] Plaintext authentication not allowed without SSL/TLS, but your client did it anyway. If anyone was listening, the password was exposed. ls NO

Dne 07.09.2020 v 12:43 Sami Ketola napsal(a): >> On 7. Sep 2020, at 12.38, Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you

Hi, We have a crash in dovecot 2.2.7 2013-12-11 10:38:44 imap(xxx at example.com): Panic: file buffer.c: line 307 (buffer_set_used_size): assertion failed: (used_size <= buf->alloc) 2013-12-11 10:38:44 imap(xxx at example.com): Error: Raw backtrace: /opt/dovecot- 2.2.7/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x672a2) [0x7f576b9742a2] -> /opt/dovecot- 2.2.7/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x67306)

OK - here's whay I need to make it work for my Linuxconf compatible authentication system. First - a question: Will this work? I can find docs on "virtualfile. auth virtualfile { mechanisms = plain digest-md5 userdb = passwd-file /etc/vmail/passwd.%d passdb = passwd-file /etc/vmail/shadow.%d user = root } Then - since the dmain name selects the passwd file, if there were a

Hello, I have a new director ring I am setting up on centos 7 with dovecot 2.3.1. I haven't been able to replecate this in testing, but as soon as I start pushing production traffic to the new ring I see dozens of these in the logs: Apr 18 00:34:00 d.director.imapd.sonic.net kernel: imap-login[163107]: segfault at 10 ip 00007ff625698dd5sp 00007ffe4b77bb28 error 4 in

How problematic is it to have default_vsz_limit = 0 in dovecot.conf? macOS+MacPorts had this as a requirement even. Gerben > On 6 Jan 2023, at 16:49, Paul Kudla <paul at scom.ca> wrote: > > > i ran into this as well > > here is the full config for mine with replication > > # cat dovecot.conf > # 2.3.14 (cee3cbc0d): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > #

I have tried these in the 10-logging.conf but no luck. There is nothing logged to the file. bash-4.2# ps -ef UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD root 1 0 0 Dec23 ? 00:00:00 /bin/bash /bootstrap.sh root 8 1 0 Dec23 ? 00:00:00 sleep 36000d root 15681 0 0 08:51 pts/1 00:00:00 bash root 16340 0 0 09:19 ? 00:00:00

This would make my life a lot easier in migrating to Dovecot. And it should be really easy to implement. Here's how linuxconf does it: Password files are placed in the /etc/vmail directory as follows: /etc/vmail/passwd.domain1 /etc/vmail/shadow.domain1 /etc/vmail/passwd.domain2 /etc/vmail/shadow.domain2 The password and shadow files are exactly the same format as the /etc/password and

Hello, I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you for the comments as from people around the Dovecot? We are using btrfs RAID-10 (/data, 4.7TB) on a physical Supermicro server with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @

One step further in my quest to create a replacement mail server. I now have my old mail server (2.3.19.1, macOS + MacPorts) and my new (2.3.20, Alpine Linux, Docker, apk package). When I turn on replication it works, but, after a while I see: Jan 06 00:50:31 replicator: Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating 268435496 bytes Jan 06 00:50:32 replicator: Fatal: master:

I'd like a separate feature for setting umask for index and cache files differently from email files. The reason is that I'm putting indexes in a separate location and I need group create rights in directories. Otherwise what happens is that the first user creates the directories, but the second user for the domain that has a different UID gets an error. default_mail_env =