similar to: Installing OpenOffice401 on CentOS6

I have installed OOo 2.3 on CentOS-5. Everything seems to work but I had to locate the item reproduced below. Since this is a vital modification I reproduce it here so that it gets a wider audience. FYI: OOo 2.3.0 and SELinux: "no suitable windowing system found, exiting." OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.3.0 is incompatible with the SELinux technology activated by default in Fedora 7, Fedora

1.. Is it even possible? Every example I've seen has bridged eth* rather wlan*. 2.. If it helps here are my scripts: $ more /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0 ESSID="snip" MODE=Managed KEY_MGMT=WPA-PSK TYPE=Wireless BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes PEERDNS=yes PEERROUTES=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME=wlan0 UUID=2b508481-ec01-4311-8903-af7aaeb9879d ONBOOT=yes

Has anyone managed to get the x2go server working on CentOS 6.7? I started testing x2go from EPEL under 6.6, and it worked well. Then I didn't use it in 6 months plus, eventually upgraded the machine to 6.7, and it's no longer working. Both Windows and Linux clients error out with "Connection failed. 0: Event not found." A Linux client run with the debug option reports:

Hey guys, I've got another C7 problem I was hoping to solve. I installed appdynamics-php-agent-4.0.5.0-1.x86_64 on a C7.1 host. It's failing to communicate with it's controller on another host. And this is the interesting part. Whether or not I have SELinux enabled, I have apache reporting SELinux problems. [root at web1:~] #getenforce Permissive May 10 20:47:56 web1 python[25735]:

On 6/6/17, 12:38 PM, "Daniel Walsh" <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: >I am asking if you run it again, does it change. If the boolean is set >the audit2why should say that the AVC is allowed. Well, if I just run audit2why again, it always tells me the same thing. However, I have now discovered that if I unset allow_ypbind, and then reset it to 1, audit2why then says

It says what it is my original post; that?s the output from audit2allow ?w (which is audit2why): Was caused by: The boolean allow_ypbind was set incorrectly. Description: Allow system to run with NIS Allow access by executing: # setsebool -P allow_ypbind 1 --- Mike VanHorn Senior Computer Systems Administrator College of Engineering and Computer Science Wright State University 265 Russ

Hi Leon, I don't have access to a CentOS 6.10 system handy, but it looks like a policy issue. If I take you're ausearch output and pipe it to audit2allow on my CentOS 7.6 system, I get the following: #============= httpd_t ============== #!!!! This avc is allowed in the current policy allow httpd_t httpd_sys_script_t:process signull; Noting that on my 7.6 system with selinux enforcing

On 06/06/2017 09:41 AM, Vanhorn, Mike wrote: > It says what it is my original post; that?s the output from audit2allow ?w (which is audit2why): > > Was caused by: > The boolean allow_ypbind was set incorrectly. > Description: > Allow system to run with NIS > > Allow access by executing: > # setsebool -P allow_ypbind 1 > > --- > Mike VanHorn > Senior

On 06/06/2017 01:19 PM, Vanhorn, Mike wrote: > On 6/6/17, 12:38 PM, "Daniel Walsh" <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > >> I am asking if you run it again, does it change. If the boolean is set >> the audit2why should say that the AVC is allowed. > Well, if I just run audit2why again, it always tells me the same thing. However, I have now discovered that if I unset

Hi all, I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in syslog: Mar 12 22:11:31 db1 kernel: [6058125.959624] type=1400 audit(1457820691.824:3029129): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=801 comm="haproxy" dest=7778 scontext=system_u:system_r:haproxy_t:s0

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:36:25AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:23:38AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > And last but not least: I got used to some way of interaction with computer, > > > and that way is most productive for me after very long use. I don't want to > > > blend in iPad generation, I want to stay

for more information : https://www.mankier.com/8/haproxy_selinux On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Am 12.03.2016 um 23:18 schrieb Tim Dunphy: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be >> working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in

Following the most recent kernel updates I restarted our outgoing SMTP MTA which was recently reconfigured to DKIM sign messages using OpenDKIM. This morning I discovered that Postfix had stopped on that server. Whether it is related to the Postfix issue or not is yet to be determined but, in the process of getting things restarted I ran across this error with Open DKIM: # service opendkim

Am 12.03.2016 um 23:18 schrieb Tim Dunphy: > Hi all, > > I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be > working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in > syslog: > > > Mar 12 22:11:31 db1 kernel: [6058125.959624] type=1400 > audit(1457820691.824:3029129): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=801 >

> type=AVC msg=audit(1482944350.289:339): avc: denied { read } for pid=2141 comm="httpd" name="family" dev="sda3" ino=262199 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_user_content_t:s0 tclass=dir permissive=0 I ran into the same problem, I think. I ran "audit2why" and passed in the AVC. It suggested a pair of booleans

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:39:03AM +0200, johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be wrote: > > > Am 02.09.2015 um 21:10 schrieb Johan Vermeulen: > > > > Op 2-sep.-2015 20:59 schreef Wes James <comptekki at me.com>: > >> > >> I yum updated yesterday and it updated chrome from 44.x to 45.x. > >> > >> It runs but it has errors going to web pages

I have a page where I document getting the increasingly popular AR5007EG Atheros wireless card working. (This is the card used in the Asus EEE PC). The current article covers several distributions, but would be modified to just cover CentOS. It does, however, involve getting third party software, as the rpmforge repos don't have the necessary drivers. (Apparently, it's a bit of a

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:49:57AM -0500, Jason Warr wrote: > > > On 6/24/2015 3:11 PM, Chuck Campbell wrote: > >Is there an easy to follow "howto" for normal LVM administration > >tasks. I get tired of googling every-time I have to do something I > >don't remember how to do regarding LVM, so I usually just don't > >bother with it at all. I

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 09:12:30AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2018?05?18? 22:33, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:17:05PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?05?18? 19:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:01:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On 2018?05?16? 22:33, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > >

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:25:49PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I for one am looking for decent replacement for firefox for at least 5 > years (no, do not suggest chrome, or google anything, please), still > without success. The bizarre with Firefox started shortly after a guy I > know (as undergraduate student in our Department) became production > director of Mozilla