similar to: Undeletable DNS Records

Hi there, need some helb please: I build a setup with two samba4 AD servers. Unfortunately there is a cadaver and doubled servername in the site-config and I am not able to delete it: root at sambak26:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(objectGUID=cf7d8ac1-b0ae-4e72-9129-ed480ee38006)' --cross-ncs -d0 # record 1 dn: CN=NTDS

Hi there, we are using Version 4.1.3-SerNet-Debian-7.wheezy deployed as AD with internal DNS. Perodically we found this message in samba.log (with debug dns:7): [2014/01/15 12:01:46.818770, 5] ../source4/dns_server/dns_utils.c:63(werr_to_dns_err) No mapping exists for WERR_TIMEOUT In the same time no local DNS entries are not resolvable: Host: ZAHNADMIN Alias: ZAHNADMIN Address:

Hi there, I build a samba 4.0.11 on a Debian Wheezy from source, joined a existing AD (samba works with internal dns) and have this smb.conf: ======= # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DOMAIN realm = DOMAIN.local netbios name = SAMBA1 server role = active directory domain controller allow dns updates = nonsecure dns recursive queries = yes

Hi there! Here it is a setup with an Windows 2003 SBS and two Samba 4.1.2. Everything is working fine, but I found differences in LDAP and need to know if this is relevant for replication samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://sbssrv2003 ldap://samba4.1.2 [...] Comparing: 'CN=Builtin,DC=SAMBADOMAIN,DC=local' [ldap://gaia] 'CN=Builtin,DC=SAMBADOMAIN,DC=local' [ldap://samba1] Attributes

Hi there, I tried to build samba 4.0.9 on a Debian Wheezy 7.1 x86 fresh install and got this error: [2717/3935] Compiling source3/smbd/scavenger.c ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c: In function ?scavenger_timer?: ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c:482:3: error: format ?%lu? expects argument of type ?long unsigned int?, but argument 3 has type ?uint64_t? [-Werror=format] ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c:490:3:

Hi there, I joined a samba 4.1.2 to a Windows 2003 SBS and have some replication error. After debugging I found this: Server ldap/ADSRVS9 at DOMAIN.LOCAL is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (ldap/ADSRVS9 at DOMAIN.LOCAL) unknown when I try to check with samba-tool drs kcc -U administrator adsrvs9 -d10 "samba-tool drs showrepl" show that

Hi there, I am struggling with samba4 and the internal dns and kerberos. It seems that DNS is the problem. When I aske for kerberos dns entrys on my workstation, I get this (11.22.33.202 is the samba4 server): root at lit2:~# dig _kerberos._udp.DOMAIN.LOCAL @11.22.33.202 ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> _kerberos._udp.DOMAIN.LOCAL @11.22.33.202 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got

Hi, I am running Samba 4.1.0 with Bind 9.8.4 and I am struggling with an "empty" DNS entry. I used Microsofts DNS MMC to add an A record to one of my zones, later deleted this entry because I wanted to move the record to another zone. After I moved it backed the A record (and the PTR) was invisible in the MMC. nslookup still works for the IP and hostname from the PDC and other hosts

Question 2a) I am also working with arules package and I have the following problem let suppose the matrix b like: b<-matrix(c(1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1),nrow=6) rownames(b)=c("T1", "T2", "T3", "T4", "T5", "T6") colnames(b)=c("It1", "It2", "It3", "It4") bt<-as(b,

Hi all, I want to find all the called functions in each function, thus I iterate the calledFunctions of each CallGraphNode in CallGraph as follow: for (CallGraph::iterator it = CG->begin(); it != CG->end(); ++it) { CallGraphNode* node = it->second; for (CallGraphNode::iterator it2 = node->begin(); it2 != node->end(); ++it2) { Function* calledFunc =

Dear Ashutosh, Thank you, I can handle some indirect callSites by getFunction() of InvokInst and CallInst. However, when I am handling C++ programs, I found the calls of member functions are converted to some strange indirect calls. For example: table->truncate(sysTransaction); // from mysql are translated to the next complex llvm IR: _ZN8Database20getSystemTransactionEv.exit: ;

So, I won't know the called function statically, Right? -------------------------------------------- Qiuping Yi Institute Of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > Typically for C++ virtual function you will see an indirect callSite > (unless not de-virtualized). > > > > Regards, >

Dear list, It has been a true adventure setting up a samba4 ad with a bind9 backend. >From what I can see, everything is more or less working: --> samba itself: root at bubba3-one:/etc/sssd# smbclient //localhost/netlogon -UAdministrator -c 'ls' Enter Administrator's password: Domain=[EARTH] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.4-SerNet-Debian-7.wheezy] .

I've been using dovecot for a year or two now, and really like it. I have a fairly simple setup, but I think it's time to get a little more advanced. I keep an "archive" of all my email, both sent and received. Every once in a while I get confused, and accidentally delete something from my archive. I also worry that I'll misconfigure a mail client some day and

Hello, as we all know from the big webmail-services like hotmail.com, yahoo.com, web.de and so on, several folders exist and nobody can remove them for a good reason, because some services rely on them: Trash, Junk, Sent. Can can't remove Trash, because every deleted message is just moved here. You can't remove Junk, because all messages recognized as spam is moved here. And you

Dear all, We would like to setup, if possible, for example: We have 4 example groups, we various users in those groups: Directors director1,director2 Support manager1,support1,support2,support3 Enquiries manager2,enquiry1,enquiry2,enquiry3 Accounts manager3, accounts1,account2 Shared Mailboxes: Support: Support, user1, user2, user3 Accounts: Directors, Support So basically, we want 2

I have an odd problem that involves clients deleting files they should not be able to delete, and claiming success, but then the files "come back" again. Here's the setup: I have a filesystem that contains a file "foobar.txt" owned by user "test", group "test". Permissions on this file are 644, permissions on the enclosing directory are 777. I share

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:02:45 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:27:38 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > How are you searching and what with ? > > I used the ADUC tool and LDAPAdmin. > > > > > Have you tried ldbedit ? > > > > ldbedit -e

On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 14:02 +0200, Henry Jensen via samba wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:27:38 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > How are you searching and what with ? > > I used the ADUC tool and LDAPAdmin. > > > > > Have you tried ldbedit ? > > > > ldbedit -e <your favourite editor> -H

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:01:19 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 13:12:42 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:02:45 +0200 > > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, the objects in question are