similar to: samba4 result 1306 (WERR_REVISION_MISMATCH)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "samba4 result 1306 (WERR_REVISION_MISMATCH)"

2013 Oct 10
0
Samba4 can't join domain - drsuapi.DsBindInfoFallBack object has no attribute
I have a Win2k3 server and am trying to manage a Samba4 box (name:UBUNTUSERVER, running Ubuntu 12.04.3 + Samba 4.0.10) as a backup. All seemed well, but after a problem with replication (result 1306 WERR_REVISION_MISMATCH), I couldn't even demote the samba4 DC. So I deleted from SERVERW2K3, deleted /usr/local/samba and re-compiled everything. Also ran make quicktest, all seems OK. Now, this
2013 Oct 11
2
Samba 4.0.10 - 4.1.0 - master can no longer join existing Win2003 domain?
Hello, ? ?I can NO LONGER join the existing win 2003 domain (functional level win 2003, I also have installed Group Policy Client Side Extensions for Windows Server 2003). I am running on Ubuntu Server 13.04. I have tried Samba 4.0.10, 4.1.0 and also, in desperation, samba-master. I managed to join the domain with samba 4.0.8 (not sure if it was .8 or .9, it was in mid-September), downloaded
2015 Jan 12
0
[Announce] Samba 4.1.15 Available for Download
===================================================================== "I'm not sure what the future holds but I do know that I'm going to be positive and not wake up feeling desperate. As my dad said 'Nic, it is what it is, it's not what it should have been, not what it could have been, it is what it is." Nicole Kidman
2015 Jan 12
0
[Announce] Samba 4.1.15 Available for Download
===================================================================== "I'm not sure what the future holds but I do know that I'm going to be positive and not wake up feeling desperate. As my dad said 'Nic, it is what it is, it's not what it should have been, not what it could have been, it is what it is." Nicole Kidman
2013 Nov 05
2
Unable to join samba4 to AD as a DC
Hello, I'm trying to get samba4 up and running as a DC in a lab environment. I have a freshly installed AD environment (W2012R2 servers, W2008R2 functional level) and I'm trying to join samba4 to it as a domain controller. When I try, I get this: # samba-tool domain join ad.netdirect.ca DC -Uadministrator --realm=AD.NETDIRECT.CA -W AD Finding a writeable DC for domain
2010 Jul 16
1
smb mount as root, access as non-root. Changed behaviour between samba 3.0.x and 3.4.x?
Hi List, I have an appliance ("the client") which mounts a CIFS share from a Samba server - the Samba server usually runs on an Ubuntu system. Within the client, the root user executes a mount command like this: mount.cifs \\UBUNTUSERVER\archive /tmp/Default \ -o noserverino,user='someuser',pass='somepassword',uid='50',gid='7' That uid/gid pair
2009 Nov 18
1
Replacing a file turns off group and world read permissions
I'm running Samba 3.32 on UbuntuServer 9.04 with both Ubuntu and Windows clients as guests. For some common shares I have create mask = 777 and force create mode = 777. This works fine except that when I *replace* a file on this share by certain methods on an Ubuntu client, the permissions get set to 733 (-rwx-wx-wx), so the file is then unreadable (and undelete-able) by a guest. The
2008 Sep 12
4
Megatec_USB on OpenBSD 4.3 - no input interrupt endpoint
Hi! I am trying to get an Atlantis-Land 1501 UPS to work under OpenBSD. The UPS works OK under Linux + megatec_usb driver+nut_2.2.2. What I get under OpenBSD is: root at puffwall:~ # dmesg OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008 deraadt at i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 128KB L2
2008 Sep 12
4
Megatec_USB on OpenBSD 4.3 - no input interrupt endpoint
Hi! I am trying to get an Atlantis-Land 1501 UPS to work under OpenBSD. The UPS works OK under Linux + megatec_usb driver+nut_2.2.2. What I get under OpenBSD is: root at puffwall:~ # dmesg OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008 deraadt at i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 128KB L2
2018 Jan 11
3
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
Hi The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is failing. I have enabled the log level 9. samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --full-sync -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9
2018 Jan 11
4
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
Hi I have tried using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is failing.Please assist to fix samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --sync-forced -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9 idmap: 9
2018 Jan 11
0
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
On 1/11/2018 1:57 PM, Harsh Kukreja wrote: > Hi > > I have tried  using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is > failing.Please assist to fix > > samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na > <http://iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na> iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na > --sync-forced -UAdministrator > INFO: Current debug levels: >   all: 9 >   tdb: 9 >  
2018 Jun 21
2
WERR_BAD_NET_RESP on replication (--full-sync)
Hello, We have a Windows 2008 DC (inview-dc1 and a samba 4.4.16 (inview-dc2) server as a backup DC. The system for the most-part works OK, but occasionally the Samba DC goes wildly out of sync (with respect to group membership), normally after a change to a large group. I have noted previously before the out-of-sync event occurs, this command always fails thus : root at inview-dc2:~#
2018 Jun 22
2
WERR_BAD_NET_RESP on replication (--full-sync)
Thanks Garming. We currently use a standalone bind DNS server. Will the later version of samba work without the integrated DNS backend? Cheers Chris On 21/06/18 23:41, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi, > > Many of these syncing problems were solved in Samba 4.7 (and probably a > few more in 4.8). There were a number of unresolved locking issues that > we uncovered as well as some
2018 Jan 12
1
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
Hi James Thanks for your response. hots -t A iumsvrpdc (use it's fqdn as well) I have verified it with the FQDN which says that the record iumsvrpdc.iumnet.edu.na exists Search for 'iumsvrpdc' objectGUID ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid : it shows 2 records found # record 1 dn: CN=NTDS
2014 Jan 09
0
Samba4/AD Replication Issue
I have a couple of Samba4 AD DCs replicating with Windows Server 2008 DCs. This has been sort of finicky, but I've managed to get it to work (mostly) for several weeks. However, I'm now having an issue where one of my Samba4 DCs will not replicate from any of the other DCs (Windows or Samba) in the domain (Error is WERR_BAD_NET_RESP). Replication output is below. If anyone has ideas of
2018 Jan 11
0
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
On 1/11/2018 10:39 AM, Harsh Kukreja via samba wrote: > Hi > > The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is > failing. I have enabled the log level 9. > > samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na > --full-sync -UAdministrator > INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 9 > tdb: 9 > printdrivers: 9 >
2018 Jun 21
0
WERR_BAD_NET_RESP on replication (--full-sync)
Hi, Many of these syncing problems were solved in Samba 4.7 (and probably a few more in 4.8). There were a number of unresolved locking issues that we uncovered as well as some inconsistencies with Windows replication. I would try join a DC with one of the latest Samba versions and see if your problems persist. Cheers, Garming On 21/06/18 21:35, Chris Lewis via samba wrote: > Hello, >
2018 Jul 02
0
WERR_BAD_NET_RESP on replication (--full-sync)
What does the WERR_BAD_NET_RESP means? I'm currently upgrading our DCs to 4.8.3 and I've noticed that the off-site DC has a sync problem of the CN=Configuration NC. The FSMO DC is still in the 4.5.5, but all other DCs, including the off-site are already on 4.8.3. Trying to sync the off-site DC with one of the updated DCs does not work either. The WERR_BAD_NET_RESP message already
2011 Jun 24
1
How long should resize2fs take?
Hullo! First mail, sorry if this is the wrong place for this kind of question. I realise this is a "piece of string" type question. tl;dr version: I have a resizefs shrinking an ext4 filesystem from ~4TB to ~3TB and it's been running for ~2 days. Is this normal? Strace shows lots of:- lseek(3, 42978250752, SEEK_SET) = 42978250752 read(3,