similar to: SSL with startssl.com certificates

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Bartosz wrote: > Dear All, > > Could you please recommend me a UPS with 100% support of the ondelay parameter and NUT compatibility? > > 850 or 1000 VA > > I have the EATON 5E850iUSBDIN UPS and it does not support this parameter so I would like to buy another UPS that for sure will support it. > > Thank you, > Bart Can you tell

I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains nothing of value. # zpool status pool: storage state: ONLINE status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'.

I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot SASL wiki entry yesterday. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL The entry: submission inet n - - - - smtpd was incorrect. It should be: submission inet n - n - - smtpd By specifying n for chroot, it ensures that DNS lookups can occur. Otherwise, if you are using reject_unknown_recipient_domain the following error will

Hello, I had an idea last week: why shut everything off (in my basement) when the power goes off (and run time goes below X minutes)? My idea: shutdown the big stuff first (two servers) leaving the little stuff (switches, wireless, gateway) running for a while longer. I might get another 30 minutes of internet that way. Let me watch a bit more streaming?. I?m convinced that idea is achievable

I received this message today, and remembered, you can't do that... $ doveadm pw -s SHA512-CRYPT Enter new password: doveadm(dan): Fatal: open(/dev/tty) failed: No such file or directory </pre> It seems if you have no tty, you can't create a password. Surely there is a better way to do this? Looking at the code, it's trying to open the tty and turn off echo. For the

This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. Any ideas? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

Interesting. Something similar came up in late May. Look for "[Nut-upsuser] Synthesize low batt (LB) fron SNMP UPS which does not support this?? Is there an archive of this list? I an?t find it. I?d been trying to figure out how to do that itself, but then found some code in drivers/dstate.c that looked like it would work, but someone else replied that they?d tried it and it didn?t work. But

With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar tests (ping -c 100). re0: <RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1 I have seen a thread on current mentioning similar problems:

One thing that I think NUT misses is the client side being able to decide to shutdown by itself based on time (this can be done), battery charge (ex if bellow 10%), and estimated runtime left (if available and considered reliable/calibrated). Without having to sort on the LB state from the server. Sent from my iPhone with ? iTypos > On Jul 16, 2023, at 4:34 PM, Willcox David via Nut-upsuser

Hi folks, I've been working on getting my WiFi network running with IPsec. I'm at the point where all traffic on the wifi subnet is encrypted (i.e. ESP). Then I tried to add AH to the equation. I failed. This picture describes the network setup: http://beta.freebsddiary.org/images/ipsec-wireless.gif Here's what I'm trying and failing with. With these rules, I get no

Greg Bailey wrote: >> I'm really just asking if I cannot just use what I take to be >> the standard openssl certificate and key in /etc/pki/tls/ >> Do I really have to create up a special cert for dovecot? > There's not really a "standard" SSL certificate. Perhaps you're > referring to a "default" certificate used by the webserver? No. I

Hello, I wondered how folks monitored slaves. In my case, I am using Nagios and the check_ups plugin. It seems to work fine but being new to nut, I'm seeking confirmation that this is a sane approach. The goal: confirm the slaves have contact with the master. The environment: * FreeBSD 12.1 * nut-2.7.4 installed from package Background: I am replacing an APC 2200 UPS (still in use) with

On 9 Jul 2004 at 13:11, Daniel Brown wrote: > On the other hand, I've run across a sysadmin who always enables his > toor accounts -- and changes its shell to bash. As a result, not only > is there an alternate root account (good in case 'root' trampled on by > accident or purpose), but you can get root bash as a login shell while > leaving the real root to its normal

Laurent Taieb via Nut-upsuser wrote on 3/9/23 9:25 AM: > > Hi NUT Users, > > One of my APC UPS is having battery issue and apparently we cannot > change battery in that UPS. (not super green?) > > I have purchased an EATON UPS and added the ref in ups.conf > > When restarting the driver, I got this error > > >0.030612[D2] Checking device 2 of 10 (0463/FFFF)

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Roger Price wrote: > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, Dan Langille wrote: > > > I wondered how folks monitored slaves. > > A NUT solution is to use a "heartbeat" generated in each slave and monitored in > say the master or elsewhere. I did find this earlier today: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2017-April/010590.html Is

The port is determined with port=nnn setting. You can't return per-protocol port like that, you need to look at the protocol requested by user and return port based on that, or you can omit port to default into "standard port". not using ssl/starttls is default. > On 17 September 2018 at 16:35 Alexander Chekalin <alexander.chekalin at gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Hello, I stumbled across a 5-year-old post on the dovecot list about changing the dovecot hierarchy separator to enable shared mailboxes (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-January/056201.html <http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-January/056201.html>). At the moment I?m stuck in a pretty similar situation. Migrated from courier to dovecot 2 years ago and preserved the

hi I want to use ECC(ellyptic curve cryptography) for SSL-connections but somehow dovecot doesn't like my ECC-certificates :( I tried to test using following scenario: machine: debian 6 (x64) dovecot 2.0.15-0~auto+21 ((f6a2c0e8bc03) from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian openssl 1.0.0e-2 from testing (as the default 0.9.8o-4squeeze3 needs also the parameter -cipher ECCdraft for testing)

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 21:35, Jean-Daniel <jddupas at xooloo.com> wrote: > > Just a wild guess as I didn?t try to configure Mail on Catalina yet, but it looks like your server only supports ?DHE-RSA?? ciphers. > I think that modern systems prefers using ECDHE key exchange and would not be surprise if iOS requires it. > Well I got the OpenSSL parts working now, but newer

I'm planning to deploy a personal dovecot IMAP server (i.e. I am the only user) in a FreeBSD jail. At present, I have IMAP deployed on the same host as one of my mail servers, which is running Postfix. I do like Postfix, but it seems to be a bit overkill for this particular situation. All my incoming MX are provided by Google. They handle the incoming mail and forward to my private MX,