Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "dns query not giving back all registers"
2014 Dec 29
2
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
And some more information about this strange effect apparently no-one
has seen before.
I now added the missing zone:
samba-tool dns zonecreate verdandi 10.16.172.in-addr.arpa -U Administrator
and it claims that the zone is okay, but the next one is missing:
Dec 29 10:31:12 verdandi named[2601]: Loading 'ad.microsult.de' using
driver dlopen
Dec 29 10:31:12 verdandi named[2601]:
2016 Dec 12
2
DNS dlz_bind9 error - samba 4.5.2
Hi,
I just did a new provision of my samba domain and now
the formerly working bind 9.10 + dlz setup does no
longer work.
When trying to start bind9 it quits with the following
error:
named[5818]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=mydomain,DC=de
named[5818]: samba_dlz: starting configure
named[5818]: dns_rdata_fromtext: buffer-0x7f9bc9231ec0:1: near 'srv2..':
empty label
named[5818]: Failed
2014 Dec 22
2
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
I just upgraded bind9 on my backup DC to 9.9.5-7-Debian and restarting
the service failed:
Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: starting BIND 9.9.5-7-Debian -u
bind -4
Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: built with '--prefix=/usr'
'--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info'
'--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var'
2019 Mar 08
2
ipconfig /registerdns & PTR Records
Hello $LIST,
i setup a new clean domain to examine the feature of updating/creating PTR records. When i call ipconfig /registerdns on the client i get this entry in the windows eventlog (sorry german)
Fehler beim Registrieren der Hostressourceneinträge (A oder AAAA) für den Netzwerkadapter
mit den folgenden Einstellungen:
Adaptername: {2A467E48-624B-4CCF-9B7D-9BA5629D8117}
2018 Oct 31
3
FW: Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
Hai,
I've checked out the log you send and i re-read the complete thread.
Based on thats done and what i did see in you logs now, looks like a * (wildcard) entry is giving the problem.
But i am not sure of that, the wildcard bugs should be fixed, when i look in bugzilla. (#10435 #12952 )
I've forwarded the mail to Rowland also before we go throw things at you again. ;-)
2015 Jan 28
1
[SOLVED] samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Last month I struggled with a severe DLZ issue and today I could solve
it. Credits for the important idea go to Peter Serbe, thanks!
I checked the DNS contents using RSAT. There was nothing wrong with SOA
nor NS entries, but the reverse zones were actually forward zones with
proper names in the in-addr.arpa. domain. I built proper reverse zones
and deleted the forward-reverse zones and Bind
2014 Jan 02
1
Strange problem with ddns AAAA delete
I am trying to setup dynamic updates with bind_dlz backend, but for some
reason if any windows client or linux with nsupdate tries to remove AAAA
record, server just 'cancelling transaction', while A and PTR records
(both on reverse ipv4 and ipv6) working fine.
If i'am remove AAAA record manually via samba-tool or windows mmc then
AAAA record can be updated, but after that it again
2017 Dec 04
3
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 12.07 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha
scritto:
> Is the DHCP server updating the records for you ?
Yes, but for now the problem is not dhcp (see follow)
> If so, you need to stop the windows clients trying to update their
> own records, they don't own them.
I have the problem when join to domani via samba on another server, or
when I run
2018 Jul 30
2
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
Hello,
I hope that someone can perhaps assist me or just guide me in the right
direction.
I've been following all the steps for setting up and migrating my Samba
Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_BIND_DNS_Server
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End
But this doesn't seem to work for me, I can get bind started up 100% when I
remove
2014 Dec 29
5
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Dear Roland,
and here we have one reasons / prove regarding Debian and current Samba BIND DLZ issues :
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/bind9/bind9_9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u3_changelog
MSG >> " * disable dlz until we get a patch to make it build again"
Well Debian Maintainers seems seeking missing the dlz patches that RHEL & SLES maintainers created
2016 Sep 26
2
named ( bind 9.9.4 ) fails to start
Hi,
I removed a couple of dead DC's from my domain using this command:
samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=<dc name>
I then restarted named on the remaining server, but it failed to start
with the following errors in messages:
named[30255]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone 'x.x.x.in-addr.arpa'
named[30255]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone
2013 Sep 12
2
samba4+bind9.9 will not start: samba_dlz: dns_rdata_fromtext: buffer-0x7f1c0cbcd680:1: near 'hostmaster.domain.de': not a valid number
Hello,
running on Debian jessie 64bit samba 4.0.8 and bind 9.9 but with the
description from https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind I run
into the following problem:
# named -u bind -g 2>&1 |tee named.log
12-Sep-2013 15:43:07.287 starting BIND 9.9.3-rpz2+rl.13214.22-P2-Debian-1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4 -u bind -g
12-Sep-2013 15:43:07.287 built with '--prefix=/usr'
2016 May 23
2
samba4 AD - winbind Could not write result
Hello,
I have two samba 4.2.7-SerNet-Debian-8.wheezy AD servers. since few days
now I have some winbind errorsthat block the server...
It seems that they appears more and more frequently... ( about one time
per day )
I have about 200 clients pc with windows 10, seven and XP. Last month
I've migrated about 30 pc from seven to 10. Is there a relationship?
In the following logs, you can see
2017 Dec 04
2
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 11.29 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha
scritto:
> Try changing the 'options' of named.conf to this:
Thanks Rowland
Integrated your suggested changes and restart samba and named
Now my named.conf is this[1], but none is change:
[ root at server-addc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names --fail-immediately
update failed: REFUSED
dic 04
2018 Oct 15
1
bind9 and samba 4.9.1
Hello,
I have the following problem with my bind9 together with samba 4.9
SerNet. If I start the bind9 I got the following error-message:
---------------
Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen
Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: started for DN
DC=zfd,DC=forumzfd,DC=de
Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: starting configure
Oct 15
2018 Aug 21
1
Samba 4.8.4 + BIND 9.9.4 - possibility of nonsecure DNS updates
> There doesn't seem anything wrong there, the only comment I would make,
> is '/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf' pointing to the correct version
> of named ?
Yes
cat /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf
dlz "AD DNS Zone" {
# For BIND 9.8.x
# database "dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so";
# For BIND 9.9.x
database "dlopen
2018 Nov 01
5
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
Hai,
> >
> > have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below.
> >;; ANSWER SECTION:
> ><domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New
> >rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade
....
> >
> > Led me to believe this is your problem. However, you say it works on
> > one DC, but not with multiple
2017 Nov 30
2
Samba AD /dns /dhcp
Hello there. I hope I'm in the right place for some Samba AD advice.
I recently added two extra ADs to a setup I inherited.
Originally there was a single Samba AD with BIND9_DLS config. DHCP was
separate.
Subsequently I installed Samba on two Raspberry Pis to act as backup
servers.
Basically, I followd this set of instructions:
2018 Oct 31
2
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
Hello Rowland,
I have already checked and the DN's are in AD, see attached.
SOA:
<domain>.corp. 3600 IN SOA psad102zadprh.<domain>.corp. . 9766
3600 600 86400 3600
See below NS, but the 1st NS (zatprdc001) doesn't exsit, and I cannot find
it anywhere.
NS:
<domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS zatprdc001.<domain>.corp.
<domain>.corp. 3600
2016 Sep 27
2
named ( bind 9.9.4 ) fails to start
Hi Rowland thanks for your response.
I'm running samba 4.5.0rc1 on CentOS 7.2
I've dumped the DNS records, and it doesn't appear to have any SRV or NS
records.
Also the SOA record is pointing at the wrong server dc03 instead of dc01.
I'm pretty sure it can be fixed, but I don't know how or what to do
On 27 September 2016 at 07:59, Rowland Penny via samba <
samba at