similar to: Blowfish crypt in rails app

Hello everybody, First a big thanks for tinc-vpn I am still using it next to wireguard and openvpn. I am having a setup where the tinc debian appliance is at 100% cpu load doing about 7.5MB/s. Compression = 9 PMTU = 1400 PMTUDiscovery = yes Cipher = aes-128-cbc How can I pick a cipher that is the fasted for my CPU and don't create a CPU bottleneck at 100%. Kind regards, Jelle de Jong

Hello all, Hoping someone can help me out here. I''ve burned almost a week trying to figure out how to decrypt an image file that has been encrypted using Blowfish CBC. I found some code on the net and have modified as follows: require ''openssl'' require ''digest/sha1'' ivArr = [0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0A, 0x0D, 0x0F, 0x0A, 0x0C, 0x0E ]

Hi folks, I'm playing with this version of OpenSSL: openssl-SNAP-20100804 On x86 using clang I can build it and run all tests successfully. On x86-64 using clang r110287 I get the error message below during "make test". Not sure if anyone has time to look into this but I'm probably not the right person to start debugging it... Thanks, John Regehr

I'm setting up a new server and am planning on using blowfish crypt. This page from the wiki http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes says the password will begin with $2a$, however mine are starting $2b$. Is this wrong on the wiki or am I doing something wrong? Just want to catch this before it becomes a problem. Thanks, Edgar

This was posted not too long ago on sci.crypt... Enjoy... I think the most relevant information is near the top, but it''s all quite good... :-) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- There is no intrinsic difference between algorithm and data, the same information can be viewed as data in one context and as algorithm in another. Why then do so many people claim that encryption algorithms

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:04:52PM -0500, Stephen Checkoway wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > > > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? > > > Take a look at

The blowfish crypt(3) mechanism supports the use of a "cost value" for password encryption. The cost value is encoded into the encrypted password that is stored in master.passwd. On OpenBSD, this cost value can be set in login.conf. FreeBSD does not currently support the cost value. The cost value is the base-2 logarithm of the number of rounds of encryption to use so

I?m using the Dovecot Enterprise Edition on Centos 6.5, but Blowfish password hashes don?t seem to work. What can I do to enable Blowfish hashes for passwords? Maybe I don?t have my installation configured properly? Note that I really want to use the existing Blowfish hashes in my MySQL database for Dovecot Authentication. The hashes are generated by PHP crypt() that has Blowfish support

> I would love to know why your ubuntu 14.04 system doesn't support sha512-crypt. I just tried SHA512-CRYPT and it is supported on Ubuntu 14.04. I think I was thinking about DBMail instead of Dovecot. I could really use support for BLF-CRYPT since my current password hashes generated by PHP are using Blowfish encryption. Maybe, Dovecot could just add support for BLF-CRYPT by using the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1341 Summary: Support multiple blowfish key lengths Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? Take a look at llvm/lib/Target/X86InstrSystem.td perhaps. -- Stephen Checkoway

I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC on X86 could consider looking into adding support for the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? If anyone is up for it there are details within these two bug reports.. http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8556 http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10266 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

(I subscribed to a daily digest for this list and can?t figure out how to reply to a reply.) Anyway, Aki Tuomi replied to my feature request saying: > We support in latest 2.2 release > > MD5 MD5-CRYPT SHA SHA1 SHA256 SHA512 SMD5 SSHA SSHA256 SSHA512 PLAIN > CLEAR CLEARTEXT PLAIN-TRUNC CRAM-MD5 SCRAM-SHA-1 HMAC-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 > PLAIN-MD4 PLAIN-MD5 LDAP-MD5 LANMAN NTLM OTP SKEY

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=946 Summary: scp slow file transfers, even with -1 -c blowfish Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Cygwin on NT/2k Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

>> Maybe, Dovecot could just add support for BLF-CRYPT by using the open source implementation of Blowfish hashing found in https://github.com/php/php-src/tree/master/ext/standard <https://github.com/php/php-src/tree/master/ext/standard>. The implementation looks like a single function to generate the hash. I?m not much of a programmer, but it would seem to me that these .c/.h files

Hello, does dovecot support bcrypt $2y$ version? (BLF-CRYPT - Blowfish crypt) doveadm pw -s BLF-CRYPT generates a {BLF-CRYPT}$2a$05$....... password. Does this mean that dovecote will not authenticate against a $2y$10$....... password? Thanks in advance, -Graham-

Hello everybody, Thank you Fufu Fang for your quick reply: With tinc version 1.0.35 and the bellow options at 100% CPu load i get about 10 MB/s... PMTU = 1400 PMTUDiscovery = yes #Cipher = none Cipher = chacha20-poly1305 Digest = blake2b512 Tried Cipher = none as well and also got 10MB/s with 100% CPU on one thread the other three available threads are idle. With inc_1.1~pre17-1.1_amd64.deb

Hi, I get "Unknown scheme: BLF-CRYPT" messages if I try to use Blowfish-encrypted passwords, even though it is supposed to be supported. I'm on 2.1.7, Debian Squeeze backports. Do you have any information whether Blowfish is supported with Debian Squeeze crypt(), or is there any other knobs I can turn on to make this algorithm available? Thanks, Kristof

> Changing your php app will probably be the easiest solution. Since I?m using Docker, the easiest solution for me is to find a linux distro that can run Dovecot well and supports BLF-CRYPT as well. What Linux distros support BLF-CRYPT and are well tested and secure? > On Jun 5, 2016, at 8:54 PM, Edgar Pettijohn <edgar at pettijohn-web.com> wrote: > > On 16-06-05 20:36:35, KT

How to encrypt and decrypt the url using blowfish in ruby? ex: url= http://localhost:3000?username=vam&paswd=1234&street=hyd&contact=999999999&company=raymarine&city=hyd&state=UP&country=ZP&zip_code=543211 please help its very urgent. Thanks in advance - Vam -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to